The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-20-2004, 03:37 PM   #1
Yellow Cheyenne
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eastern Kansas
Posts: 488
Replacing rod/main bearings without pulling motor

Is it possible to replace the rod and main bearings in a 96 Vortec motor without pulling the motor? I have a 96 4x4 suburban that if I remove the front differential I have pretty good access to removing the oil pan. I don't think that replacing the rod bearings will be too difficult, but don't know how hard (or if even possible) it would be to replace the main bearings without at least pulling the transmission back to allow dropping the crank out. Can the block half of the bearing be "rolled" in without dropping the crank? I just bought this thing and it was getting antifreeze in the oil. Replaced the intake manifold gaskets and that problem is fixed. It runs good and carries decent oil pressure, but I have heard that antifreeze in the oil is hard on bearings and thought if I could replace the bearings without too much hassle, that it might be good insurance against future bearing failure.

TIA,

Randy

(I posted in 88-98 board but know this one gets more readership)
__________________
'72 Cheyenne. AC, PS, PB, Rear slider window, tilt. Light yellow (grapefruit yellow according to new sales literature from '72)
'56 Chevy short step V-8 (My dad bought it new!!)
'70 Olds 442 convertible
'70 Olds Rallye 350
Yellow Cheyenne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2004, 03:51 PM   #2
oldsub86
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 695
Wouldn't it just be easier to pull the motor out? Certainly more likely to do a good job of it if you have it out where you can get at everything and check clearances and use the torque wrench without stuff in the way. If you don't really dismantle it you should be able to pull the engine and fix it and drop it back in pretty quickly.
__________________
1968 Chevy - 292 with a powerglide
oldsub86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2004, 04:25 PM   #3
cdowns
Senior Member
 
cdowns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: daytonabeach
Posts: 22,956
to replace the bearings the crank should be pulled out and measured/machined for proper clearance it's not a job easily done with the engine in the car/truck
__________________
71c-10 350/2004r/4:11 lowered3/4 longbed/dead by hurricane

MEANING OF DEATH::::: SOMEBODY ELSE GETS YOUR STUFF

DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU THINK

TAKE MY ADVISE;I DON'T USE IT ANYWAY
cdowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2004, 04:25 PM   #4
beautimus
Registered User
 
beautimus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: woodstock, alabama, usa
Posts: 938
just my 2 cents, but it seems to me that the good oil presure is a pretty reliable indicator of bearing condition. personally i would let the motor cool off over night and start the engine when its cold, if it doesn't rattle, and has good oil pressure that comes up pretty quickly, i would just drive it.
in other words, i think you fixed the problem , before any real damage was done.
tony
__________________
i survived cancer and kidney stones, but my kids are killing me.
beautimus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2004, 05:20 PM   #5
stllookn
Saving 1 truck at a time!
 
stllookn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 6,465
I've tried to replace the mains and rods without pulling the engine and it is a real hassle. The oil dripping on your head and the mess is a real pain. Getting the mains out is nearly impossible without pulling the engine and crank...let alone getting them torqued from under there. I agree with Tony, if you still have good oil pressure you probably don't have a problem at all! Change the oil again and go for it!
__________________
'68 C20 Longhorn 50th Anniversary 400/TH400
'68 C20 Longhorn 50th Anniversary 468/TH400w/buckets
'72 C20 Halfhorn (Longhorn w/o cab and front clip)
'69 Flxible Cruiser (look up ugly in the dictionary)
stllookn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2004, 05:29 PM   #6
72C203503ONTHETREE
Registered User
 
72C203503ONTHETREE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Grant, Alabama
Posts: 504
I replaced the rod bearings in my 76 4x4 but could have done the mains also. Its not that bad to do, theres special tools that you can use but a flat flexiple tool made out of plastic or even soft metal will work. I have replaced main bearings without removing the engine in a 82 Landcruiser FJ60 with a six cylinder. The bearings werent really bad but I had the pan off for something else and did all the bearings while I had it off for good insurance. The way to take car of the oil dripping problem is to let the engine sit over night with the drain plug out and then spray carb or brake cleaner up into the engine, it stops 99% of the oil drippings plus cleans out the engine.
__________________
72 Chevy C20, SOLD (Dang it.)

09 Challanger RT six speed in all black.

74 Datsun 710 wagon, all 1.8 liters of screaming Datsun power.

73 C10 long bed, 350/350 combo, nice shape.
72C203503ONTHETREE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2004, 05:38 PM   #7
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,690
Just chainge your oil sooner than you are suposed to for the next few times...like maybe every 1000 miles for the next 3000. This will help get rid of the coolant that you don't see on your dip stick.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2004, 06:45 PM   #8
Yellow Cheyenne
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eastern Kansas
Posts: 488
I've put about 500 miles on it and changed the oil 3 times during that time. I too thought I would just call it good and go on until a couple of days ago. A friend had bought a 99 burb that ran good until recently. It developed a rod knock so the engine was disassembled to find the crank had significant wear on one rod and all other bearing surfaces were marginal at best. He had driven it about 20,000 miles in the last year. When it was disassembled, the intake manifold showed signs that the intake manifold gaskets had been changed. The theory is that it had also gotten antifreeze in the oil and that the intake gasket was the only repair done to it. I bought mine knowing it had the problem, but don't have any idea how long it was run like that. Judging by the general upkeep on the rest of the vehicle, I am afraid it was run like that for more than just a few miles. If it were just me driving it, I wouldn't worry about it too much, but this is now my wife's main transportation and she occasionally goes on 300 mile trips with it, hauling our to kids so I don't want it to strand them somewhere. Was just wondering if it was possible to do bearings from underneath and spend 4-5 hours as opposed to pulling the motor and using a weekend to replace the bearings.

Randy
__________________
'72 Cheyenne. AC, PS, PB, Rear slider window, tilt. Light yellow (grapefruit yellow according to new sales literature from '72)
'56 Chevy short step V-8 (My dad bought it new!!)
'70 Olds 442 convertible
'70 Olds Rallye 350
Yellow Cheyenne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2004, 07:47 PM   #9
walker
Registered User
 
walker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: north of Phx AZ about 30 miles
Posts: 698
Maybe you should pull the pan, check one or two rod and main bearings with plastigauge and see. If you have loose bearings then I would pull the motor and do a crank job.
If I were going to keep it for a long time I would consider a valve job while it was apart for the bearings. Oh, and a performance cam too...
__________________
Andy,Phx AZ
'67 C-10 (Ahhh, done at last. Well there is that disk front end I want to put in and...)
"23 C-Cab-sold
'48 Ford 8N tractor(still working)
'67 Scout(Now on the road)
'70 MG B.-sold
walker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-21-2004, 12:29 AM   #10
jimfulco
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Shreveport LA
Posts: 3,170
A friend of mine replaced the crank bearings on his '93 4x4 Suburban with the engine in a couple of years ago, no problem. I don't think he messed with the transmission at all.
jimfulco is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com