Thermostats - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

chevy55 · 08-24-2004, 08:04 PM

Im sure its been posted before here but I can't seem to find it, so maybe somebody can help.

Is it better to run a 195 degree thermostat or a 160 degree thermostat in a small block?
Which one will be more beneficial to keeping an engine running cooler?

thanks

cdowns · 08-24-2004, 08:32 PM

thermostats dont have refrigeration systems built into them they dont cool engines they're designed to raise the temp of an engine

Longhorn Man · 08-24-2004, 08:38 PM

They are designed to both warm up the engine, and control the cooling.
Most engines on dynos like cooler T-stats...they make more power that way. If you look at the computer chips for the late model cars, they normally say to use a 160 T-stat. Cooler temps can help reduce detonation, and in doing that, you can run more timing, and even more compression...albeit, minimal increase. If you have a cooling system on it's last let, a 160 T-stat will get you by and you can loosen the rad cap, no thread of boiling over. (I went from Tx to Ohio and back like this with zero problems) Another added benifit is less vapor lock, which seems to be a problem on these old rigs.

A hotter T-stat helps with lowering emissions, and assists in evaporating the traces of water in your oil which is always present.

If you remove the T-stat all together, you will end up overheating the engine, and have unpredictable coolant temps.

I normally run a 160 in the hotter months, and then a 195 in the winter...it is amazing the difference that makes when you kick on the defroster.

08-24-2004, 08:04 PM	#1
chevy55 Registered User Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Mesa, AZ Posts: 105	Thermostats Im sure its been posted before here but I can't seem to find it, so maybe somebody can help. Is it better to run a 195 degree thermostat or a 160 degree thermostat in a small block? Which one will be more beneficial to keeping an engine running cooler? thanks __________________ 1955 Chevy Shortbed Stepside 2nd Series. http://community.webshots.com/user/chevy55truck

08-24-2004, 08:32 PM	#2
cdowns Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: daytonabeach Posts: 22,956	thermostats dont have refrigeration systems built into them they dont cool engines they're designed to raise the temp of an engine __________________ 71c-10 350/2004r/4:11 lowered3/4 longbed/dead by hurricane MEANING OF DEATH::::: SOMEBODY ELSE GETS YOUR STUFF DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU THINK TAKE MY ADVISE;I DON'T USE IT ANYWAY

08-24-2004, 08:38 PM	#3
Longhorn Man its all about the +6 inches Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Hilliard Ohio Posts: 2,693	They are designed to both warm up the engine, and control the cooling. Most engines on dynos like cooler T-stats...they make more power that way. If you look at the computer chips for the late model cars, they normally say to use a 160 T-stat. Cooler temps can help reduce detonation, and in doing that, you can run more timing, and even more compression...albeit, minimal increase. If you have a cooling system on it's last let, a 160 T-stat will get you by and you can loosen the rad cap, no thread of boiling over. (I went from Tx to Ohio and back like this with zero problems) Another added benifit is less vapor lock, which seems to be a problem on these old rigs. A hotter T-stat helps with lowering emissions, and assists in evaporating the traces of water in your oil which is always present. If you remove the T-stat all together, you will end up overheating the engine, and have unpredictable coolant temps. I normally run a 160 in the hotter months, and then a 195 in the winter...it is amazing the difference that makes when you kick on the defroster.



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.