The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-30-2004, 10:36 AM   #1
stingray72
Red Headed Step Child
 
stingray72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,216
For those with 20" wheels

This is somewhat crossposted but I think it will get more views here.

I've decided on wheels for my Jimmy. 20x8 Eagle 211's but I'm not sure what backspacing I need.

I've got a 72 Jimmy with an Early Classic 4/6 drop. I'm sure someone around here as the same setup with the drop and 20" wheels. Just wondering what backspacing you're using. I don't want to rub

Thanks
__________________
"Dinner, the perfect break between work and drunk"

-Homer Simpson
stingray72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2004, 10:54 AM   #2
67ChevyRedneck
Hittin E-Z Street on Mud Tires
 
67ChevyRedneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 23,090
I'm not sure on the backspacing, but I do know that if you're going to run a rim that large you definately need to upgrade your brakes and install larger rotars or you're gonna have a heck of a time stopping!! It would be a good idea to upgrade the rear to a larger drum or even disks! If you already have, great! Just lettin ya know! To help you with the backspacing you need to figure out where you want the rim to sit within the wheelwells. Use the width of the rim to determine this. I would use a piece of cardboard or something. Then using the face of your rotor or drum, where the wheel bolts up, measure from the face to the backside of the cardboard. viola! It also helps to know the height of the tires your using so they don't scrub the wheelwells too....
67ChevyRedneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2004, 11:23 AM   #3
mocwon
Keep On Truckin'
 
mocwon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Buda, Texas
Posts: 1,354
Interesting choice, that's exactly what I bought. The engine is not in the truck which is why it sets up so high. I have 2-1/2" drop spindles but I'm probably going to have to lower it even more for the look I want.

I could only find them with 4-1/2" back spacing on the 8X20 version. $1,700 for the set including Goodyear V rated tires, mounting, balancing, lug nuts and tax.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Just Passin' Thru
Some projects are like herding cats; others are like putting out fires; this one was like herding cats on fire.....
mocwon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2004, 04:54 PM   #4
Smokin72on20s
Ebay Junky
 
Smokin72on20s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: CO
Posts: 893
i dont have any pics, but i have 20x8s on my 72 with a 4/6 drop and 5" backspace. They are sucked under a little so i am getting some 1" adapters to push them out a little. I'm running 275/45 tires with room to spare, probably the biggest i would go with tires though.
__________________
1972 CHEVY C-10 SWB 2WD - Possible Typhoon 4.3 turbo drivetrain..
1983 Chevy c10 swb 2wd - possible 350tbi supercharged...
Smokin72on20s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2004, 08:08 PM   #5
Deuce
Registered User
 
Deuce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Calgary, Alberta,Canada
Posts: 1,595
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smokin72on20s
i dont have any pics, but i have 20x8s on my 72 with a 4/6 drop and 5" backspace. They are sucked under a little so i am getting some 1" adapters to push them out a little. I'm running 275/45 tires with room to spare, probably the biggest i would go with tires though.
So 4" backspacing would be ideal??
__________________
I know what your thinking.......I have ESPN.

Sometimes it's easier to do things the hard way.

Fesler Built 1968 Chevy C10....Must resist the urge to mess with it!!
Deuce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2004, 09:19 PM   #6
lolife99
67-72 parts collector,…
 
lolife99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,692
back spacing

I'm running 17x8 and 17x9.5 Eagle 212's. The 8's have a 5inch b.s. and the 9.5's have a 4.5 inch b.s. I think the same backspaces would apply to 20's also. If you are going to squeeze a 20x10 on the back,... it will need a 5 inch b.s. (And it will be TIGHT!) Also,... I have ECE's 4.5/6 drop on my '71 2wd blazer.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Keith

Convert to disc brakes.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823
lolife99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2004, 09:45 PM   #7
lazygaurd
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Saskatoon Saskatchewan
Posts: 492
wheel size diameter

Why would you need to run larger brakes in order to compensate for 20" wheels. You are not really changing the overall diameter, you are simply running a smaller side wall tire. The overall height isn't going to be much different than running a 295-50-15. You see 4x4's running 33's or 35's all the time which are way bigger and they use stock brakes! Just my opinion but I can't see any need for changing brakes!
lazygaurd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2004, 09:52 PM   #8
Smokin72on20s
Ebay Junky
 
Smokin72on20s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: CO
Posts: 893
deuce- from what i see 4" backspace would be ideal, it just depends on if you like the sucked in look or semi-flush look, i personally dont like the sucked in look.
__________________
1972 CHEVY C-10 SWB 2WD - Possible Typhoon 4.3 turbo drivetrain..
1983 Chevy c10 swb 2wd - possible 350tbi supercharged...
Smokin72on20s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2004, 09:57 PM   #9
71swb4x4
Senior Member
 
71swb4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brookings, SD
Posts: 10,497
From what I have heard you want bigger brakes to compensate for the extra weight. You are only eliminating a little bit of rubber compared to the amount of metal that you are adding with the larger wheel. That is why most people recommend the larger brakes.
__________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't good for anything, but you can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs.
71swb4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2004, 10:20 PM   #10
68w/sbc406
Got Light Emitting Diode?
 
68w/sbc406's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Newberg, OR
Posts: 2,485
a set of TSL boggers weigh more than an aluminum rim
__________________
1968 1/2 ton 2wd lwb 6 lug disc and bags up front. Next c notch and rear bags

'02 Chevy Silverado LT ext cab short bed 2WD 5/7 drop on 22's(the family car)

1993 Cherokee work ride/weekend wheeler
68w/sbc406 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2004, 10:23 PM   #11
71swb4x4
Senior Member
 
71swb4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brookings, SD
Posts: 10,497
I doubt he is going to put TSL boggers on a Blazer with a 4/6 drop :p
__________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't good for anything, but you can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs.
71swb4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2004, 10:27 PM   #12
68w/sbc406
Got Light Emitting Diode?
 
68w/sbc406's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Newberg, OR
Posts: 2,485
but guys dont upgrade there brakes on 4x4s when they do that. can you imagine how much fender you would have to sawzal out to fit some boggers on a 4/6 dropped truck
__________________
1968 1/2 ton 2wd lwb 6 lug disc and bags up front. Next c notch and rear bags

'02 Chevy Silverado LT ext cab short bed 2WD 5/7 drop on 22's(the family car)

1993 Cherokee work ride/weekend wheeler
68w/sbc406 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2004, 10:35 PM   #13
cali_surfer
Registered User
 
cali_surfer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Chico, CA
Posts: 1,136
Hey mocwon, what color is that? looks gorgeous!!
__________________
My engine is stock... trust me ;o)
cali_surfer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2004, 10:37 PM   #14
Smokin72on20s
Ebay Junky
 
Smokin72on20s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: CO
Posts: 893
just get aluminum wheels, stay away from the big heavy 20s. i have 20 inch rotary forged aluminum centerlines and the wheels only wiegh 21lbs a piece.
__________________
1972 CHEVY C-10 SWB 2WD - Possible Typhoon 4.3 turbo drivetrain..
1983 Chevy c10 swb 2wd - possible 350tbi supercharged...
Smokin72on20s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2004, 11:11 PM   #15
brad2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: edmond, ok
Posts: 1,058
20x8 with 4.5 bs on front and 245/40/20's. Rear is a 20x10 with 5 bs and a 295/40/20. Five inch bs on the rear still didn't fit well.
Attached Images
 
__________________
74 swb
71 2wd Jimmy
82 2wd Blazer
brad2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2004, 11:12 PM   #16
68w/sbc406
Got Light Emitting Diode?
 
68w/sbc406's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Newberg, OR
Posts: 2,485
got a side pic???
__________________
1968 1/2 ton 2wd lwb 6 lug disc and bags up front. Next c notch and rear bags

'02 Chevy Silverado LT ext cab short bed 2WD 5/7 drop on 22's(the family car)

1993 Cherokee work ride/weekend wheeler
68w/sbc406 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2004, 11:15 PM   #17
brad2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: edmond, ok
Posts: 1,058
That may be the only pic I took with that setup. Here it is with a 18x8 4.5 bs and a 245/45/18 on the front.
Attached Images
 
__________________
74 swb
71 2wd Jimmy
82 2wd Blazer

Last edited by brad2; 11-30-2004 at 11:17 PM.
brad2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-30-2004, 11:19 PM   #18
mocwon
Keep On Truckin'
 
mocwon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Buda, Texas
Posts: 1,354
4" back spacing was what I was wanting but they were not available at any of the Eagle Alloy warehouses so I settled for 4-1/2". Running 275 x 45 tires. I'm with Smokin72on20s on the spacers.

cali_surfer: Thanks. Its the same color code as on '03 Hummer; '04 Avalanche and '05 Corvette.
__________________
Just Passin' Thru
Some projects are like herding cats; others are like putting out fires; this one was like herding cats on fire.....
mocwon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2004, 02:31 PM   #19
67ChevyRedneck
Hittin E-Z Street on Mud Tires
 
67ChevyRedneck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Greenville, SC
Posts: 23,090
71swb4x4 is right, you need the bigger breaks to compensate for the larger rim. Its not the weight of the rim, but the rolling friciton and inertia of it. The larger diameter rim creates more inertia and resists stopping more than a 15." you don't have to upgrade brakes. its just safer if you do. and stock brakes with 32" tires on a 4x4....brave! I've seen this conversion on TRUCKS! and several other magazines....they all said the same thing about running rims larger than 16"
67ChevyRedneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2004, 04:53 PM   #20
MrShelley
Too Many Clubs Club
 
MrShelley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kilgore, Texas
Posts: 443
This is the first time I've ever heard of getting larger brakes just because you have larger wheels. It seems to me that the added weight of a larger wheel would be offset by the thinner (and therefore lighter) sidewall carcass of a lower profile tire. A larger diameter, wider width wheel and tire combination might weight more, but I seriously doubt that it would be enough to warrant changing brakes to compensate for it.

on another note...
brad2, the 20x10 wheel, 295/40-20 tire combination is what I want to use on the back of my truck. Exactly what about the 5" backspacing wasn't right? Too much? Not enough? I'd like your input so I'll know what to order when I get my wheels.

Edit: Actually, after looking at the specs, I'll probably go with a 295/45/20 in the rear. It has a .4" narrower section width than a 295/40/20 so that should give me a little bit more room. I'd still like input from brad2 though on what backspacing he would recommend for a 20x10.
__________________
How I installed my air bags...

Last edited by MrShelley; 12-01-2004 at 04:59 PM.
MrShelley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2004, 05:04 PM   #21
slogo
Registered User
 
slogo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Morristown,TN
Posts: 482
I've got 18x8-4.5 front 20x10-5.5 rear fits great
slogo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2004, 07:22 PM   #22
FirstGen
Just Don't Stop!
 
FirstGen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,239
Brad2 - I'm also interested in your input on the 20x10's BS.
Thanks.
__________________
1968 C10 build in process
TT LSA/6L90e/9"
FirstGen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2004, 07:43 PM   #23
724wdcopper
graphic designer
 
724wdcopper's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Spokane, Washington
Posts: 841
no to hijack, but with my 18" 31" overall, i notice absolutely 0 difference in stopping when i switch to my winter 15" aluminum slots with 31" overall height. the difference in weight is maybe a pound or two. my brakes are stock, but i do want to upgrade, just to look cool

i dont think anyone other than a test facility could measure any difference in stopping by changing only rim size, not overall diameter. but hey, maybe i'm stupid and dont know what i am talking about.
724wdcopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004, 12:29 AM   #24
brad2
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: edmond, ok
Posts: 1,058
5 inches was just not enough backspacing with the 295/40/20. Slogo is probably correct with the 5.5. Also the Jimmy was bagged so if you are not needing to really tuck the tire it would be fine. I had an adjustable panhard bar but it still shifted to much. Maybe if I had the longer ECE panhard bar it would have been better. Had I been running a narrower tire it would have also been better. There you go......not a very definative answer. It was almost three years ago with that setup or I would probably able be able to give a little better answer.
__________________
74 swb
71 2wd Jimmy
82 2wd Blazer
brad2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2004, 02:21 AM   #25
bagged74
its just $$$$$
 
bagged74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: OK
Posts: 2,078
I had 20x8 with 4.5bs on the front of my jimmy, and 20x9.5 with 5.5bs 245/40 front 275/35 rear tires. It was a 74, so different bodystyle, but i think the backspacing requirement are about the same
Attached Images
 
bagged74 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com