The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board > The 1973 - 1991 Blazers, Jimmys, and Suburbans Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-18-2004, 02:07 PM   #1
raskolnikov
Registered User
 
raskolnikov's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: cape cod, ma
Posts: 4
Talking municipal package

hello all,
I am new to this board; I hope that I'm posting this query in the appropriate area...
Recently, while looking at Suburbans on Ebay, I came across a very nice 1985 K-20 that was being sold in Harrisburg, PA. The seller had acquired the vehicle from the local fire department. It was a beutiful vehicle, but unfortunately it was snatched up immediately.
Long story short, it was advertised as having the 'municipal package,' i.e. 10 spring rear leafs, the Scottsdale trim, and most curiously, a 'factory high horsepower' 350 ci purportedly putting out 325 hp stock.
Was the seller just blowing smoke? Was there such a thing as the municipal pakege in 1985 for which the high hp 350 was available? The corresponding VIN # listed the engine as the 'M' style 350, i.e. the heavy-duty with fewer emissions equipment.
I have this 'M' engine in my '86 Suburban; however, I wasn't aware of the fact of an alternate high hp LT9 engine in 85-86. Can someone enlighten me on this subject? I am a little wary, because a potential purchaser could've purchased the 454 if he needed more oomph; I can't imagine that a hopped up factory 350 would offer substantially better performance and economy. Secondly, I didn't think municipalities were so interested in offering hopped up powerhouses for employees; it seems thast the HD 350 would've been sufficient for most needs. Lastly, if the info was correct from the seller, the 'municipal package' Suburban in 1985-6 would've been more powerful than the, albeit emissions starved, GM Corvette LT1 engines of the '80's...
Just smells fishy, but I'm nonetheless curious...
I'd appreciate it if anyone could offer enlightenment...
Thank you, and its nice to be a member of this very informative post...
__________________
1986 c-20 suburban
eaton posi
Two-tone, pin-striped and proud
raskolnikov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2004, 11:53 PM   #2
jimfulco
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Shreveport LA
Posts: 3,170
I smell BS. Maybe it was 325lb-ft, but I seriously doubt 325hp.
jimfulco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 02:40 AM   #3
k5mike
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 54
k5mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-20-2004, 09:40 AM   #4
Blue Beard
Registered User
 
Blue Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Washington State
Posts: 8,831
Welcome to the board from SW Washington State...

Check the vin at americanclassic.com
__________________
1970 Chev CST
2003 Harley Fatboy
1975 Chevrolet Step Van
1956 Chev Bel Air
1977 Blazer 2WD For Sale $3000.00
1978 Blazer 2WD For Sale $7000.00
1978 Silverado
2005 Monte Carlo
Blue Beard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2004, 07:27 PM   #5
784X4GUY
Did someone say MUD?
 
784X4GUY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Pullman,WA
Posts: 1,089
Hello and welcome from Phoenix AZ...Later Mike
__________________
Im in the market guys...so keep ya eyes peeled
--------------------

Mini trucks are for guys who cant get it up!
784X4GUY is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:02 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com