|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
06-05-2002, 05:29 PM
|
#1 |
|
Before and After
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Leduc, Alberta CANADA
Posts: 632
|
can I use blocks to lower the rear of my 72?
Would I be able to use blocks to lower the rear of my coil spring 3/4 ton 3 or 4 inches?
__________________
Not Grandpa's C-20 anymore... 383 Stroker 425HP, 485Ft/Lbs Lowered 3.5" Front / 5" Rear 66,000 miles. Alberta, CANADA |
|
|
|
06-05-2002, 06:02 PM
|
#2 |
|
Gasser
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Thomasville,NC USA
Posts: 456
|
2 inches is the most you want to go with blocks. Any more, the trailing arms will be WAY low.
__________________
:thud 70 sstep tubbed, Muncie, double hump, snowflake, |
|
|
|
|
06-05-2002, 06:17 PM
|
#3 |
|
Before and After
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Leduc, Alberta CANADA
Posts: 632
|
I'm not sure I understand that. If I use blocks, wouldn't my trailing arms be in the same place, and my axle raised? I am concerned about the axle hitting on the frame. as well as the angle of the driveshaft.
__________________
Not Grandpa's C-20 anymore... 383 Stroker 425HP, 485Ft/Lbs Lowered 3.5" Front / 5" Rear 66,000 miles. Alberta, CANADA |
|
|
|
|
06-05-2002, 06:26 PM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Des Moines, IA.
Posts: 188
|
raising the axle will make the arms closer to the ground
__________________
67 short 2wd. FOR SALE 69 long box w/72 grill 69 Camaro 327 4-speed Des Moines, Iowa |
|
|
|
|
06-05-2002, 06:31 PM
|
#5 |
|
Before and After
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Leduc, Alberta CANADA
Posts: 632
|
Ahhh,
Lower to the ground, in comparison to lower from the frame. Gotcha. Thanks it makes sense now.
__________________
Not Grandpa's C-20 anymore... 383 Stroker 425HP, 485Ft/Lbs Lowered 3.5" Front / 5" Rear 66,000 miles. Alberta, CANADA |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
