![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,690
|
Fire wall differances....
I just noticed something interesting, maybe someone can tell me why it's like this.
I have 3 cabs all together. 1 GMC 1/2 ton '69. (mounted) 1 Chevy 1 ton '70. (mounted) 1 Chevy 3/4 ton '70 (not mounted) While I have no pics of the 3/4 ton cab on hand showing this, I just looked at it yesterday, and it is just like the one ton, but the GMC is differant. The clutch hole on the firewall on the one ton and the 3/4 ton, are both like this one, where it is exiting above the bend that starts the floor. But the GMC has it like this... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,690
|
Maybe some one can tell me by looking at there fleet...
is it becouse the year? is it becouse GMC vrs Chevy? is it 1/2 ton verses 3/4 ton and one ton???? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Texan in Iowa
Posts: 2,523
|
Interesting...I wish I had a pic of the '72 GMC 3/4 cab. I think it was on the angle section (lower hole, second pic). Does that mean it's a GMC thinng? I would doubt it, since Chevys and GMCs were made on the same lines. But maybe it mattered what line they came off of?
![]() I'm curious to see an explanation of this.
__________________
Ben '68 Chevy C10 Custom LWB 327/TH400 2nd owner '16 GMC Sierra 1500 SLE Dblcab 4wd 5.3 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,991
|
Its not like that on any of the 3 cabs I have here, 2 of them 1/2 tons, 1 of them 3/4 ton, none of them GMC's
That just looks wierd, I don't think I have seen any like that before. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,690
|
Interesting...
I started thinking about how the 1/2 ton is the only one with oddball cab mounts out of the whole C/10 - C/30 (including the K trucks). But then i thought that the 1/2 ton would have it up high, like my other 2 since the 1/2 ton sits lower onto the frame... still making no sence. This GMC has a few oddities about it. No one has confirmed that a 2 wheel drive 305 V-6 with a TH400 should have a high hump ...but it does. Also, in that hump, some of you will remember, it has some sort of hole down at the bottom of the hump...again...factory. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Victoria, BC, Canada
Posts: 2,409
|
I can either perplex you more or make things simpler, depends on how you look at it. I went out and had a look for myself, like a few others I'll bet. I have a 1970 GMC 1/2 ton, clutch hole is like the first pic you posted, above the bend and its a large oval.
So the hole below the bend is not unique to 1/2 tons, but still could be a difference in year and/or Chevy/GMC.
__________________
1970 GMC 1500 Custom Original 350/TH350 Victoria, BC, Canada You can wish in one hand and crap in the other. See which one gets filled first. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
My other Love
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Castlegar B.C. Canada
Posts: 4,085
|
My renter had a 1 ton 69 GMC cab with the clutch hole like in your second picture, weird never really thought much about till this post
__________________
![]() Castlegar B.C.The great white North (Canada Eh!) Hooter_5@hotmail.com First generation Monte Carlo club pictures of my life |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Big Bar, California
Posts: 136
|
67 GMC "lower hole"
I too had a GMC with the lower hole........I thought it was because it was a V6. Sounds like it is a GMC thing. Mine was a '67.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Texan in Iowa
Posts: 2,523
|
Hey Andy, don't all TH400s have high humps? My '67 C20 327/TH400 does.
__________________
Ben '68 Chevy C10 Custom LWB 327/TH400 2nd owner '16 GMC Sierra 1500 SLE Dblcab 4wd 5.3 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Recovering 67-72 Addict
![]() Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: North Bend, WA
Posts: 1,788
|
My GMC is like first pic...
__________________
68 Short Fleet 4x4; 427; BTO Level 3 700R4; NP205; Dana 60 front and rear; 4" lift with 35's; Disc brakes; AGR variable ratio steering; factory bucket seats; factory tach and tilt. "Friends call me cruzer cuz I like fast cars and fast women" |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |
Bloo
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Barren County Kentucky
Posts: 6,283
|
my 70 cab, and both 71s have it like the longhorn.. id have to check on the 72, never payed attention to it
__________________
ASE Master Certified-GM Trained-Mechanic 1968 Chevy C30 157" WB Wrecker 1969 Chevy CST/10 SWB 1971 Chevy Custom/10 (first truck) 350, NV3500 5 speed 1971 Chevy K20 Custom Camper 4x4 350 TBI, SM465/NP205 1974 Chevy Custom Deluxe/10 1979 Chevy Custom Deluxe K10 farm truck beater 1989 Chevy K2500 Quote:
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,690
|
Not all TH400 trucks had the high hump, the one ton longhorn has a low hump and came with the TH400.
It is said that only 4X4's and big block trucks...but I think the V-6 trucks did too regerdles of tranny...just no one is able to confirm it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
My other Love
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Castlegar B.C. Canada
Posts: 4,085
|
My 69 chev has orignal th 400 with low hump
__________________
![]() Castlegar B.C.The great white North (Canada Eh!) Hooter_5@hotmail.com First generation Monte Carlo club pictures of my life |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: New Carlisle, Ohio,USA
Posts: 1,404
|
My 70 GMC 3/4 ton, looks like the first pic.
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() LIFE AIN'T EASY WHEN YER FAT AND GREASY! GMC= Got More Class! ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,690
|
Interesting...at a glance, I see no trend here. Anyone else before I tally up the facts here?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,991
|
Put me down for a low hump 400 and regular holes on 3/4ton and 1/2 ton Chevs
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,690
|
lol gee-emm...which you calling a regular hole...the first pic or the second one?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 451
|
I see a bit of a trend here. It could be a 69 GMC thing, or it could be a V6 thing. I am not home right now (in hotel room, on laptop), so I can't check my 67 GMC
__________________
72 C10 Cheyenne Super Full trim Factory tach dash A/C dash Factory tilt 350 / 350 power train - with Edelbrock components. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 3,991
|
Define Normal,
Im not the one with the freak truck here :P Last edited by Gee_Emm; 08-27-2002 at 12:07 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,690
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|