|
01-26-2009, 08:18 PM | #1 |
People know me
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Hermiston, oregon
Posts: 840
|
exhaust sizing
I have a fairly beefed up 400 flat tops, balanced, cam, aluminum intake and carb, I am taking my truck in for exhaust next week and I was originally gonna go with 2.5" duals with H pipe off of stock ramhorns and into 2-1/4 flowmasters.
I already have the flowmasters, But I put 2.5" duals into 3" flowmasters with an H pipe on my blazer. It sounds sweet, but i lost alot of bottom end on it, It is a 350 with and rv cam. What are you guys running on your rigs? I will not do a single pipe I want the look of duals for sure
__________________
1972 k/5 blazer CST 4X4 Crate 350, th350/205, dana44with trac-loc/14 bolt with detroit locker, 4 wheel discs 4.56s, 8" suspension lift using 73-87springs, 1" zerorate custom front crossmember, HAD CV drivelines and driveshaft e-brake, full cage, PRP seats, Full autometer gauges, 38x14.5x16 Toyo M/Ts, 16x10 Polished aluminum rockcrusher wheels 1967 longbox 4x4, Strong 400/400/208, 44/12bolt 4.10s, 6" lift, 35" Toyo M/Ts on corvette rally wheels |
01-26-2009, 10:01 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sherwood Oregon
Posts: 1,908
|
Re: exhaust sizing
Roll the 2.5, especially if your motor is a little beefed up. I will probably be hacking off all my brand new 2.5 X pipe and replacing it with 3 inch for the new motor
|
01-26-2009, 10:34 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Westminster, Maryland
Posts: 411
|
Re: exhaust sizing
i run 3" dual with moroso auger type mufflers, no crossover at the moment, probably do an H pipe, i like it, i run homemade silencers on the street, take em out with 1 bolt at the track
|
01-26-2009, 11:07 PM | #4 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Burnet Texas
Posts: 121
|
Re: exhaust sizing
I have dual 2.5 into flow masters with no h pipe. 3" is an overkill in my opionion, but then again I have never really got any measurable results from exhaust other than sound. Just my.02
|
01-26-2009, 11:38 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sherwood Oregon
Posts: 1,908
|
Re: exhaust sizing
It's been tested many times that if your motor makes like 500 HP or more 3 inch pipe is better
|
01-26-2009, 11:52 PM | #6 |
People know me
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Hermiston, oregon
Posts: 840
|
Re: exhaust sizing
Ok I already own the 2-1/4 flowmasters that i will be using on this truck.
I have 2.5" duals with H pipe and 3" flowmasters(picked them up for $80 In boxes) so thats what i used on my blazer. It had dual exhaust on it before i had it redone and it was small, I just noticed I lost alot of lowend by upsizing. Just curious what everyone else was running and there results
__________________
1972 k/5 blazer CST 4X4 Crate 350, th350/205, dana44with trac-loc/14 bolt with detroit locker, 4 wheel discs 4.56s, 8" suspension lift using 73-87springs, 1" zerorate custom front crossmember, HAD CV drivelines and driveshaft e-brake, full cage, PRP seats, Full autometer gauges, 38x14.5x16 Toyo M/Ts, 16x10 Polished aluminum rockcrusher wheels 1967 longbox 4x4, Strong 400/400/208, 44/12bolt 4.10s, 6" lift, 35" Toyo M/Ts on corvette rally wheels |
01-27-2009, 12:00 AM | #7 |
Eat My Rust
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cypress, Texas
Posts: 3,362
|
Re: exhaust sizing
Headers and bigger pipes create less back pressure which open up top end power while sacrificing low end torque. Even as much as tossing a glass pack in place of the suffocating "muffler" on my Firebird opened up it's top end a good bit... but it never had any noticable drop in the low end.
I'll have a drive soon enough to see how my truck goes with 2-1/4 pipes |
01-28-2009, 01:21 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sykesville MD
Posts: 357
|
Re: exhaust sizing
with stock ram horns i would bet that it wont matter 2.25 versus 2.5, if you really want to let her breathe better, you need a set of headers. ever hear the phrase "a chain is as good as its weakest link" i think exhausts are the same way, it doesnt matter if you have 2.5 feeding into your 2.25 mufflers, because the flow will get restricted and slowed down at the 2.25. i would probably just get 2.25 from the manifolds into the 2.25 mufflers, even so, your not getting the full benefit of the bigger diameter pipe because the manifolds are restricting it right from the start. dont get me wrong, the 2.25 with manifolds will help over stock. LuckyHen... is right, 3" on a 400HP engine lets say, will probably loose back-pressure, which helps get the exhaust out of the engine, so it would most likely hurt you if you run 3"
__________________
'55 3100 2nd series short-bed stepside '70 Corvette coupe stingray '71 Chevelle 2-dr coupe SS clone '71 C10 long-bed fleetside '83 long-haired brunette wife |
01-28-2009, 02:42 PM | #9 | |
Sierra Grande Club
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: New Mexico USA
Posts: 2,433
|
Re: exhaust sizing
Quote:
s/t
__________________
1971 GMC Sierra Grande, 1/2 ton short wide, original 4 bolt 010 020 block & heads. (matching #'s). 383 stroker, SMI q jet 750 cfm, Lunati Voodoo 60102 cam, Scorpion roller rockers, Spin Tech pro street mufflers with X pipe. |
|
01-28-2009, 02:50 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Sykesville MD
Posts: 357
|
Re: exhaust sizing
that is a neat chart, seems to make sense to me, thanks S/T
__________________
'55 3100 2nd series short-bed stepside '70 Corvette coupe stingray '71 Chevelle 2-dr coupe SS clone '71 C10 long-bed fleetside '83 long-haired brunette wife |
Bookmarks |
|
|