The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-01-2009, 06:12 PM   #1
Prostreet 72
Prostreet 72
 
Prostreet 72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Goodrich, Michigan
Posts: 278
LS1 or traditional SBC

I need advise. I have a line on a 6.0L LS1 engine. The price is right. I would make the switch to a carb if I go this way. Can anyone tell me what I need to get with the engine to make it work for me. I will be using a TH350 trans.

Also, can anyone tell me the pros and cons of making the switch? I can build a bullet proof big inch big block, but these new fangled things are just that, new fangled things to me.

Chris

P.S.

This is going in the "Green Monster" build.
__________________
Prostreet 72

"Green Monster" 1972 Fleetside Build
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...1&goto=newpost



http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=319041
Prostreet 72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 07:09 PM   #2
texanidiot25
Eat My Rust
 
texanidiot25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cypress, Texas
Posts: 3,362
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

The LS motors are a pretty simple motor to deal with once you decide to go with a carb and get rid off all the sensors need to run the fuel injection.

I'd go with a Carb'd LS1. Just about 400 hp right out of the box and the odd-ball carb'd late model motor.
texanidiot25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 07:37 PM   #3
americanmusc1e
Senior Member
 
americanmusc1e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,079
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

5.7L LS1 or 6.0L LS2 or LQ4

which one are you talking about
i'm thinking about doing a LQ4 swap into my truck, the motor and tranny together go for about $1500

an LS1 or LS2 and tranny will cost you around $5000 easy

the reason i am going with an LS series is they take more HP on factory cast bottom ends although speed parts are more expensive for them

genIII smallblock (LQ series iron truck motors) cast bottom ends can handle about 700HP on stock bottom end without too much trouble

genI smallblocks (350 etc..)will take about 500HP on a stock cast bottom end
__________________
-- Josh

Instagram: @americanmusc1e

OLD SKOOL-- 1970 C10. 454/Th400/3.07 posi Build Thread
FARM TRUCK----1949 Chevrolet 3800 Power Wagon Hauler Build Thread

1999 4wd OBS Tahoe - daily.

DM me if you can't see photos i posted
americanmusc1e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 09:04 PM   #4
Kid
Senior Member
 
Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kansas
Posts: 702
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

I'm not sure for your reasoning for eliminating the fuel injection/ computer control of the motor, but I will provide my personal experience & opinion. After putting a 5.3 with injection in my truck, i'll never go back to a carbed motor. Runs like a champ & I averaged just over 20MPG overall on the 08 "Power Tour".
Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 10:44 PM   #5
americanmusc1e
Senior Member
 
americanmusc1e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,079
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kid View Post
I'm not sure for your reasoning for eliminating the fuel injection/ computer control of the motor, but I will provide my personal experience & opinion. After putting a 5.3 with injection in my truck, i'll never go back to a carbed motor. Runs like a champ & I averaged just over 20MPG overall on the 08 "Power Tour".
any advice for someone like me wanting to do a LQ4 swap into my '70, what harness did you use???
__________________
-- Josh

Instagram: @americanmusc1e

OLD SKOOL-- 1970 C10. 454/Th400/3.07 posi Build Thread
FARM TRUCK----1949 Chevrolet 3800 Power Wagon Hauler Build Thread

1999 4wd OBS Tahoe - daily.

DM me if you can't see photos i posted
americanmusc1e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 10:59 PM   #6
LEEVON
Registered User
 
LEEVON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ozark, MO
Posts: 4,887
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

Prostreet, the 6.0 is a great engine whether you stay FI or go carb. It's your choice, don't let anybody tell you different. FI offers great performance, tunability, driveability, and mpg. It's not that difficult, you just need somebody to do your tuning. Carb conversion is simple and effective.

For the carb conversion you will need:

MSD 6010 ignition controller and harness (people don't like the Edelbrock version because it's timing is not programmable and it has too much).

GMPP or Edelbrock (performer or victor jr) LSx intake for carb

6-7 psi / 110gph fuel pump and regulator

Flexplate adapter/spacer for TH350

Exhaust manifolds - S&P, Doug Thorley headers or 98 f-body stockers. I am going to use '04 GTO manifolds.

Check out the "conversions & hybrids" section on ls1tech.com.
__________________
'20 Silverado Trail Boss ~ '17 Tahoe ~ '79 K15 Sierra Grande ~ '76 Blazer 2wd ~ '71 Cheyenne swb ~ '55 Pontiac Safari ~'50 3100 bagged ~ '80 Wife ~ Late model kids

Last edited by LEEVON; 03-01-2009 at 11:01 PM.
LEEVON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 11:09 PM   #7
71BB_LWB
Thread Killer!
 
71BB_LWB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chandler, Arizona
Posts: 235
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

Quote:
Originally Posted by americanmusc1e View Post
any advice for someone like me wanting to do a LQ4 swap into my '70, what harness did you use???
I know you asked americanmuscle but I will answer also. I used the factory harness, found all info I needed on LS1tech.com. You can buy a ready to go harness for $700+ or have a factory reworked by a pro for $450 (making it plug and play), or do it yourself like I did for cheap.
I bought HPTuners to do all my own tuning but there are lots of guys that can do it all for you.
Good luck either way!
__________________
71 Cheyenne SWB LS1 and auto.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=256470
_____________________________________
If it's worth doing, it's worth doing twice...
_____________________________________
Don't Mistake Honesty for Negativity...
71BB_LWB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-03-2009, 07:01 PM   #8
Kid
Senior Member
 
Kid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Kansas
Posts: 702
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

Quote:
Originally Posted by americanmusc1e View Post
any advice for someone like me wanting to do a LQ4 swap into my '70, what harness did you use???
I used a custom harness built by "Speartech" & am very happy with it. Top notch quality wire /terminals/protective wrap. John uses "hi-temp" wire loom & asbestos wrap where needed.
Kid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 09:08 PM   #9
SactoJim
Registered User
 
SactoJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,970
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

If you go carb, you will also need a way to run the ignition....edelbrock and MSD have solutions.

Not too sure how the TH350 works....seems I read somewhere you may need a flexplate adapter or.....?

Sure someone will pipe in on this.
__________________
72 Cheyenne SWB Fleet
Nut & bolt frame off in progress...99.9999%
- supercharged 383
- 4 wheel discs
- relocated fuel tank
-

My Build Thread
SactoJim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 10:41 PM   #10
71BB_LWB
Thread Killer!
 
71BB_LWB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Chandler, Arizona
Posts: 235
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

Not sure why you would want to get rid of the FI, but they are great motors, I only have a couple of miles on mine and I will never do a carb again, I love it.
__________________
71 Cheyenne SWB LS1 and auto.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=256470
_____________________________________
If it's worth doing, it's worth doing twice...
_____________________________________
Don't Mistake Honesty for Negativity...
71BB_LWB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 11:13 PM   #11
boostat4500
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 346
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

If your going to switch to a carb, why bother with the 6.0L? I'm going to assume you all ready have a SBC in the truck? Why not just spend the money on improving it instead. Plus, it will cost you more to switch to a carb than just leaving it injected, even if you have to buy a harness and PCM seperately. Don't be scared of these motors. Once you get down to the basics, a motors a motor, whether from 2009 or 1960.
My .02
I can get you PCM pinouts if you decide to go that route and modify a stock harness, cheapest and pretty easy. Just let me know.
__________________
1971 Suburban 4x4, LQ4 6.0L, 4L80E, etc.

Last edited by boostat4500; 03-01-2009 at 11:16 PM.
boostat4500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 11:26 PM   #12
texanidiot25
Eat My Rust
 
texanidiot25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cypress, Texas
Posts: 3,362
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

Quote:
Originally Posted by boostat4500 View Post
If your going to switch to a carb, why bother with the 6.0L? I'm going to assume you all ready have a SBC in the truck?
Because everything between the intake and out put shaft is better than an old school SBC. Even with a carb.
texanidiot25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-01-2009, 11:59 PM   #13
Chevymann1968
Registered User
 
Chevymann1968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Houma LA
Posts: 193
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

Well i was torn with the same thing then i read an article in a performance magazine and read about the motownLS it is an old school block adapted to run ls heads the best of both worlds!!!! But if you go with the 6.0 liter go with the lQ9 not the LQ4!!! The LQ9 has aluminum heads !!! This is the same motor i have in my Silverado SS The best time was a 14.3 at 94 mph So in know that ,that truck would run even better cause it isnt near the weight of my SS!!! Good luck with the choice!!!

Ernest B.
__________________
1968 GMC
Rebuilding Stage

2001 Camaro SS SOLD
Chevymann1968 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 12:14 AM   #14
boostat4500
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 346
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

Actually, other than the very earliest LQ4's they both have aluminum heads. The difference between the LQ4 and LQ9 is the pistons. The LQ9 has flat tops and about a half point higher compression. Heads are identical.
And I agree that the motor is still better than a gen 1 even with a carb. I just don't understand dickin' with the swap if your not going to keep it's biggest advantage, the EFI.
__________________
1971 Suburban 4x4, LQ4 6.0L, 4L80E, etc.

Last edited by boostat4500; 03-02-2009 at 12:14 AM.
boostat4500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 12:35 AM   #15
Chevymann1968
Registered User
 
Chevymann1968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Houma LA
Posts: 193
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

Agreed!!!! Good call on the LQ9 and LQ4 I thought that the heads were different!!!!! Learn something new everyday!!!
__________________
1968 GMC
Rebuilding Stage

2001 Camaro SS SOLD
Chevymann1968 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 01:08 AM   #16
heavy71chevy
Registered User
 
heavy71chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: antreville, south carolina
Posts: 873
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

Im planning on going the LS route with a carb...alot of people dont like the efi garbage IMHO so please dont flame me...For me its alot easier to adjust my holley double pumper with a screwdriver then cranking up my laptop to adjust anything.And the tested the carb vs efi on the LS familt of engines not to long ago...They held almost identicle numbers for power but it had more low end grunt to it with the carb and put out a good more torque with the gmpp manifold and a 750 holley atop the block
__________________
"Dixie Destroyer"
71 C10 LWB Fleet
Future Blown Prostreet Monster
heavy71chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 01:18 AM   #17
Gray Ghost
Senior Member
 
Gray Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Terrell, TX
Posts: 1,967
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

That's the point...with EFI you don't have to adjust a thing once the initial tune is done. That said I ain't here to talk anyone out of a carb. It took me the last ten years to come around to even thinking about a new gen motor. Now that I am here though, I'll NEVER pay to rebuild another gen 1 motor and I can't wait to ditch carbs forever.

With me it's all about getting 325-350horses WITHOUT stopping at every other gas station. Not toi mention starying effortlessly EVERY morning regardless of the temps outside.

Go with the LS motor, even if you insist on a carb. I doubt very seriously you'll be disappointed.
__________________
Kelly
'05 GMC Sierra SLE Z71
Bone stock except for new bed rail caps.

Last edited by Gray Ghost; 03-02-2009 at 01:19 AM.
Gray Ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 01:57 AM   #18
heavy71chevy
Registered User
 
heavy71chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: antreville, south carolina
Posts: 873
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

x2 gray..The way to swap the cam in the LS is pretty trick aswell and real easy
__________________
"Dixie Destroyer"
71 C10 LWB Fleet
Future Blown Prostreet Monster
heavy71chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 02:13 PM   #19
Ackattack
Senior Member
 
Ackattack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Valley Center KS
Posts: 3,525
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

Gen III engines are great, and I've never had a problem with them. I've had 6 of them.

I think the big advantage of them is the fuel injection. You get all that power without hurting the wallet (gas $$$). In my corvette I have gotten 33mpg!!! And it ran a 12.18!!!

Plus, tuning with a laptop, you don't get your hands dirty
Ackattack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 04:52 PM   #20
Elephanthead
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Carmel, IN
Posts: 187
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

Yeah, another vote for the fuel injection, also thumbs up on the motown ls1 old school block. If I was crapping out cash, I would build one of those.
Elephanthead is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 05:19 PM   #21
lowbucktruck
Registered User
 
lowbucktruck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sacramento, California
Posts: 62
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

If you want to drop an LS Gen III motor into your old truck, why not upgrade the transmission too? Why keep the old 3-speed Turbo 350 when you can get a newer auto tranny 4L60E or 4L80E that has overdrive and is designed to work with your LS engine. Makes more sense.
__________________
"Two rules get you through life: If it's stuck and it's not supposed to be, WD-40 it. If it's not stuck and it's supposed to be, duct tape it."
lowbucktruck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 05:45 PM   #22
Prostreet 72
Prostreet 72
 
Prostreet 72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Goodrich, Michigan
Posts: 278
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

Quote:
Originally Posted by lowbucktruck View Post
If you want to drop an LS Gen III motor into your old truck, why not upgrade the transmission too? Why keep the old 3-speed Turbo 350 when you can get a newer auto tranny 4L60E or 4L80E that has overdrive and is designed to work with your LS engine. Makes more sense.
I hear you guys loud and clear, but here is the deal. I have 2 kids under the age of 3, two classic trucks, a house payment, daycare payments, street driven car payments etc. I would love to have the truck roll out with a LSX engine with a 6 speed manual trans in it, but I have to take baby steps with this truck. When I built the Prostreet truck, it was just my wife and I. Now a I have a couple more responsibilitys to take care of first before the truck. So that is the reason I need to go with the 350 trans. I have it on the floor of the garage. Later I would love to trade up to one of the later transmissions. But first I have to start with this one.

I will probably go with the carb over the fuel injection because I like carbs. I like how they look on these engines, and how they run on them. My trucks are not driven everyday. In fact, the black truck has not been wet, via a hose or rain drop in three years. So fuel economy is not my primary goal. I would just like to step up to something new. Learn something new for the future.From what I have been told by some builders, the stock LS1 with a carb swap will make 375-390hp out of the box. To take my tired old 350 andrebuild it to the same hp, I will spend more than I am on this new engine. Right now I can't expose my engine source, but after it is on my garage floor, I'll give you all his name and phone number.

This engine is coming with a spun bearing. Thus the low price. I still can't believe it myself. There are many, many more where this one is coming from. I will let you in in the source later.

I appreciate all of the help and guidance with my LS1 swap. You guys are the experts, having been there already. I may not go in the exact direction you went in, but still the same require your help with my swap.


Thanks a ton!

Chris
__________________
Prostreet 72

"Green Monster" 1972 Fleetside Build
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...1&goto=newpost



http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=319041
Prostreet 72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 06:08 PM   #23
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prostreet 72 View Post
I hear you guys loud and clear, but here is the deal. I have 2 kids under the age of 3, two classic trucks, a house payment, daycare payments, street driven car payments etc. I would love to have the truck roll out with a LSX engine with a 6 speed manual trans in it, but I have to take baby steps with this truck. When I built the Prostreet truck, it was just my wife and I. Now a I have a couple more responsibilitys to take care of first before the truck. So that is the reason I need to go with the 350 trans. I have it on the floor of the garage. Later I would love to trade up to one of the later transmissions. But first I have to start with this one.

I will probably go with the carb over the fuel injection because I like carbs. I like how they look on these engines, and how they run on them. My trucks are not driven everyday. In fact, the black truck has not been wet, via a hose or rain drop in three years. So fuel economy is not my primary goal. I would just like to step up to something new. Learn something new for the future.From what I have been told by some builders, the stock LS1 with a carb swap will make 375-390hp out of the box. To take my tired old 350 andrebuild it to the same hp, I will spend more than I am on this new engine. Right now I can't expose my engine source, but after it is on my garage floor, I'll give you all his name and phone number.

This engine is coming with a spun bearing. Thus the low price. I still can't believe it myself. There are many, many more where this one is coming from. I will let you in in the source later.

I appreciate all of the help and guidance with my LS1 swap. You guys are the experts, having been there already. I may not go in the exact direction you went in, but still the same require your help with my swap.


Thanks a ton!

Chris

I was posted while you were. I totally understand the kids and bills thing. If you go with the LS1 now you can always upgrade to OD and EFI later. If you getting a great deal, I say go for it. Most people who have them around here are way too proud of them.
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!

Last edited by 67_C-30; 03-02-2009 at 06:09 PM.
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 06:11 PM   #24
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

When you get your engine, please put in line for the PM list of your source. I'd love to buy one that just needed a crank or something. I wanna tear into to one anyway!
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!

Last edited by 67_C-30; 03-02-2009 at 06:12 PM.
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-02-2009, 08:16 PM   #25
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,023
Re: LS1 or traditional SBC

Quote:
Originally Posted by Prostreet 72 View Post
I.......From what I have been told by some builders, the stock LS1 with a carb swap will make 375-390hp out of the box. To take my tired old 350 andrebuild it to the same hp, I will spend more than I am on this new engine.....
Yeah, that's true. But if you keep the efi and do a cam/heads swap you can run 500/hp with the a/c on.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com