Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
03-25-2009, 03:15 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Santa Rosa, Ca
Posts: 586
|
Summit heads what are thes comparable to?
Im thinking about buying these heads for use with an 87 TPI fuel injection set up. But before I do I want some opinions. I did some research already and found that these heads are actually made by Brodix IK's. But the question is how well do they perform?
Um running a gen I 350 with flat top pistons. http://store.summitracing.com/partde...5&autoview=sku
__________________
My build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=456220 Best 1/4 mile time 12.1 @ 111 w/traction issues 1969 GMC SWB 1964 chevy II Nova ht Last edited by tranz am; 03-25-2009 at 03:17 PM. |
03-25-2009, 03:37 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Brighton, TN
Posts: 1,267
|
Re: Summit heads what are thes comparable to?
They would work good for a TPI setup. I'm going with the 210cc ones from jegs. Little bit pricier but their for a built 383. Or at least will be anyway.
__________________
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together. |
03-25-2009, 03:51 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Santa Rosa, Ca
Posts: 586
|
Re: Summit heads what are thes comparable to?
Im thinking on stroking mine too actually.
210cc intake runners, man those are a lot bigger then these summit ones. How much were your heads? I bet they arnt for 87+ intakes are they?
__________________
My build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=456220 Best 1/4 mile time 12.1 @ 111 w/traction issues 1969 GMC SWB 1964 chevy II Nova ht Last edited by tranz am; 03-25-2009 at 03:54 PM. |
03-25-2009, 04:39 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Brighton, TN
Posts: 1,267
|
Re: Summit heads what are thes comparable to?
Heres a link. I havent ordered them yet but they are the ones im going with. Their the 215cc ones. I was mistaken. They are the best for the money that i have found. I already have all my block work done. I started with a 99 model vortec and added 6" h-beam rods and a forged crank. I havent ordered my pistons yet cause im toying with the idea of running dual turbo's. If i do ill be running about 8.5-1 pistons if not ill be running about 10.5-1 pistons and a bottle. Everyone i have talked to said you cant hardly build an engine that the 215cc runners will not handle.
http://www.jegs.com/i/JEGS/555/51423/10002/-1
__________________
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together. |
03-25-2009, 05:11 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Santa Rosa, Ca
Posts: 586
|
Re: Summit heads what are thes comparable to?
looks great but I wonder if it would hinder low rpm power being so large? will the TPI manifold even bolt up to it? You said vortech heads. do they still retain the off set center bolt holes for the intake?
__________________
My build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=456220 Best 1/4 mile time 12.1 @ 111 w/traction issues 1969 GMC SWB 1964 chevy II Nova ht |
03-25-2009, 05:39 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Brighton, TN
Posts: 1,267
|
Re: Summit heads what are thes comparable to?
Vortec is just the block. Its the same as a standard block other than it has a one piece rear main and its a factory roller motor. These heads will fit a TPI manifold if you drill out the center 4 holes to match the standard head configuration. But to be honest if you looking into building horsepower your gonna be dissapointed with TPI. You want to go up a couple years and use an lt1 style injection if your looking to build horsepower. TPI is great for an everyday driver but not for a horsepower application.
__________________
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together. Last edited by monte0185; 03-25-2009 at 05:39 PM. |
03-26-2009, 11:45 AM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sunny, Florida, some might call it South Alabama
Posts: 834
|
Re: Summit heads what are thes comparable to?
Just to clarify. Or maybe I'm confused and someone call straighten me out. Vortec isn't the block it's the heads. A vortec motor (L31) is a factory roller block with the vortec heads on the motor. And like Monte said, they are some of the best heads that chevy made. And if you want real HP, check out the fast burn. They are an aluminum setup of the vortec heads with more cam clearance. And edelbrock does make a vortec substitute head that is aluminum and I'm thinking of picking a set up for my truck so i can run a larger cam, but the problem that I'm running into is the TPI won't support my cam is what I'm being told. Even with the upgraded rails and runners.
__________________
Just sold my C10...sad day... Looking for a 1972 Blazer to hopefully fill the hole in my heart. |
03-26-2009, 12:50 PM | #8 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Santa Rosa, Ca
Posts: 586
|
Re: Summit heads what are thes comparable to?
there is a book out there called the "chevy tpi fuel injection swappers guide" that goes into great detail about custom aftermarket tpi stuff to get higher hp and or flow out of a tpi system. A reburned chip should solve the problem.
here is a set of large intake runners for example Quote:
__________________
My build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=456220 Best 1/4 mile time 12.1 @ 111 w/traction issues 1969 GMC SWB 1964 chevy II Nova ht Last edited by tranz am; 03-26-2009 at 03:32 PM. |
|
03-26-2009, 01:57 PM | #9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Brighton, TN
Posts: 1,267
|
Re: Summit heads what are thes comparable to?
Quote:
__________________
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together. |
|
03-26-2009, 01:14 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sunny, Florida, some might call it South Alabama
Posts: 834
|
Re: Summit heads what are thes comparable to?
The vortec and the LT1's are very similar, but the LT1's water flow is the opposite of the vortec. And if you use the vortec heads you have to get a converter plate (edelbrock) sells it. And I have been told that the vortec heads actually open the higher RPM's up since the reason the original TPI's fall off is due to the restrictive heads.
__________________
Just sold my C10...sad day... Looking for a 1972 Blazer to hopefully fill the hole in my heart. |
03-26-2009, 02:01 PM | #11 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Brighton, TN
Posts: 1,267
|
Re: Summit heads what are thes comparable to?
Quote:
__________________
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together. |
|
03-26-2009, 02:04 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Santa Rosa, Ca
Posts: 586
|
Re: Summit heads what are thes comparable to?
so let me get this right. you can bolt on an Ls1 head onto a gen I block?
__________________
My build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=456220 Best 1/4 mile time 12.1 @ 111 w/traction issues 1969 GMC SWB 1964 chevy II Nova ht |
03-26-2009, 02:30 PM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Brighton, TN
Posts: 1,267
|
Re: Summit heads what are thes comparable to?
Nope sorry if i didnt specify. The LS1 style is the new 4.8, 5.3, 5.7, and 6.0 These are a completely different critter than any of the previous engines GM came up with. Something you might want to do is look up the history of the Chevy Small block. There are several different generations and it might give you some clarification on which is which and what is compatible. I could try to explain them all but theres not enough room on this site!! LMAO. sorry theres just that many variations.
__________________
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together. |
03-26-2009, 03:13 PM | #14 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Santa Rosa, Ca
Posts: 586
|
Re: Summit heads what are thes comparable to?
yea thats what I thought, just checking. So your talking about the LT1 stuff then Im guessing. now Im really confused with all the miss printing. Lets Clarify this
So what years are the vortec heads made? So what was the difference between the Lt1 and Vortec? what years was the LT1 made? So I have to use a Vortec style intake manifold with the heads unless I use an adapter plate? Quote:
__________________
My build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=456220 Best 1/4 mile time 12.1 @ 111 w/traction issues 1969 GMC SWB 1964 chevy II Nova ht Last edited by tranz am; 03-26-2009 at 03:25 PM. |
|
03-26-2009, 06:25 PM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sunny, Florida, some might call it South Alabama
Posts: 834
|
Re: Summit heads what are thes comparable to?
TPI was 85-91
LT1 was 92-96 I believe LS1 was 96-present L31 is a truck motor, first debuted in 1996. They made 305 and 350. The heads installed on a 305 don't flow as well as the 350 heads
__________________
Just sold my C10...sad day... Looking for a 1972 Blazer to hopefully fill the hole in my heart. |
03-26-2009, 10:03 PM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Brighton, TN
Posts: 1,267
|
Re: Summit heads what are thes comparable to?
Thanks!! I figured i was wrong on the dates.
__________________
A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Duct tape is like the force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the world together. |
03-26-2009, 11:35 PM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tejas
Posts: 691
|
Re: Summit heads what are thes comparable to?
The lt1 also ran to '97 in f-bodies and maybe began in '91 vettes
__________________
'72 cheyenne super step, '05 long bed gmc |
03-12-2015, 11:50 PM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Sonora ca
Posts: 1
|
Re: Summit heads what are thes comparable to?
Keep it simple
|
03-13-2015, 10:21 AM | #19 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chandler AZ
Posts: 1,149
|
Re: Summit heads what are thes comparable to?
There was also an LT4 engine that produced a bit more horses than the LT1 from the factory. It was only 96-97 in Vettes with manual transmissions in 96. 97s may have been available with an auto. Basically the LT4 was the same as LT1 with better heads, intake and camshaft.
My LT4 has bigger cam, extrude honed heads and manifold, roller rockers, 6" rods and stroked to 3.875. It has no problem hitting the 6800 RPM rev limiter right now. It pulls HARD from 1500-6300. Plus they are purdy.
__________________
1970 Longhorn, Front Disc, 350/4 bolt, 882 heads, HEI, Edelbrock, 700R4, HO-52/4.11. 1996 Corvette, Collector Roadster, LT4, 396, 450RWHP, 6sp, 4.11/Dana44/posi 5 point roll bar And let us not grow weary of doing good, for in due season we will reap, if we do not give up. Gal 6:9 |
Bookmarks |
|
|