The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-21-2009, 10:01 AM   #1
ZombieWeinerDog
Registered User
 
ZombieWeinerDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sparta, MI
Posts: 446
Stupid Question about burnouts

i have a 3 speed manual rear wheel drive. it has disks in the front and drums in the back. will revving it up, dumping the clutch, and holding down the break damage the rear brake? i have enough power to do it, but i am worried about damaging the rear brake drums.
__________________
1972 longbed- 454
1967 shortbed- 355
ZombieWeinerDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 10:12 AM   #2
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,852
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

Yeah,why wouldn`t it?Are the brakes all you`re concerned about?
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 10:15 AM   #3
1970 CST Short Wide
Senior Moment
 
1970 CST Short Wide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pittsburg Ca
Posts: 4,168
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

Think about it. You’re trying to stop your wheels by holding down the brake but they continue to spin because you’re pouring the coals to it. You'll be replacing brake shoes more often at the least not to mention the strain you’re putting on the rest of the brake parts.
__________________
1970 CST LS 1 6 speed Ford 9 inch Detroit Tru Track, Dakota Didgital, Vintage Air, QA1 Coil Overs Front & Rear Lots of FUN
2013 GMC PU, Oldest Son
71 GMC LWB. QA1 Suspension, Angry SB. Youngest Son
2019 GMC Diesil Dually. Youngest Son
2017 Toyota SUV Daughters car
2018 Traverse , Wife’s Ride
Pittsburg Ca
94565
1970 CST Short Wide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 10:16 AM   #4
ZombieWeinerDog
Registered User
 
ZombieWeinerDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sparta, MI
Posts: 446
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

thats what i thought
__________________
1972 longbed- 454
1967 shortbed- 355
ZombieWeinerDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 10:20 AM   #5
bigguy69
dazed and confused
 
bigguy69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: marion nc
Posts: 1,649
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

you could buy a line loc to lock the front brakes and it will do better burnouts
__________________
members met: redbaron69, billsbowtie,nc67
bigguy69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 10:26 AM   #6
ZombieWeinerDog
Registered User
 
ZombieWeinerDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sparta, MI
Posts: 446
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigguy69 View Post
you could buy a line loc to lock the front brakes and it will do better burnouts
i read about that, how much are they?
__________________
1972 longbed- 454
1967 shortbed- 355
ZombieWeinerDog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 10:35 AM   #7
Skirkpat
Registered User
 
Skirkpat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: K.C. Missouri
Posts: 1,024
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

Why not buy a P.O.S. truck to tear up, and keep your nicer one for driving like you care about it? or you could just pull it up to a brick wall if you like spinning a tire, it is easier on the brakes?
Skirkpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 10:58 AM   #8
Skirkpat
Registered User
 
Skirkpat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: K.C. Missouri
Posts: 1,024
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skirkpat View Post
Why not buy a P.O.S. truck to tear up, and keep your nicer one for driving like you care about it? or you could just pull it up to a brick wall if you like spinning a tire, it is easier on the brakes?
My God, I have tuned into my father.....I think I see a nose hair...LOL
Skirkpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 11:41 AM   #9
GASWAGON
AMERICAN IRON ADDICT
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 299
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

The other thing to consider is the rear end. If it's a open rear, your just spinning the right rear and gear oil isn't traveling to the axle bearings or side gears. After a period of time damage can occur. A posi is better as both axles are spinning and the carrier is operating the same as driving down the road. I would second the line loc idea and keep the other info in the back of your mind. Breaking stuff is just part of the fun!!
GASWAGON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 01:00 PM   #10
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,852
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skirkpat View Post
My God, I have tuned into my father.....I think I see a nose hair...LOL
I see a couple ear hairs where they don`t belong,too.

Heck,why not mount a couple bleach jugs upside down in the bed in front of the tires (tire?) with a release cable so you can make a puddle to smoke out bigtime?
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~

Last edited by special-K; 04-21-2009 at 01:01 PM.
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2009, 08:36 AM   #11
mesa
Registered User
 
mesa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Twin Falls, Idaho
Posts: 33
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Skirkpat View Post
My God, I have tuned into my father.....I think I see a nose hair...LOL


That's funny!
__________________
1970 C10 LWB 292 inline.
1969 C10 LWB 250 inline.



Pants on the floor....
mesa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 10:36 AM   #12
stealthy '69
'69 Chevy SWB
 
stealthy '69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Surprise, Az
Posts: 1,065
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigguy69 View Post
you could buy a line loc to lock the front brakes and it will do better burnouts
Damn you beat me to it.
stealthy '69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 09:35 PM   #13
westofb
I really hate wet sanding!
 
westofb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brookfield, MO
Posts: 601
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigguy69 View Post
you could buy a line loc to lock the front brakes and it will do better burnouts
or just crimp the rear brake line off, leaving front brakes only, cheap and easy, only tool need is a pair of vice grips...lol.

With the peg leg rear, do not think you really need to apply brakes at all to get the rear tire (1) to spin.
westofb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 10:35 AM   #14
stealthy '69
'69 Chevy SWB
 
stealthy '69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Surprise, Az
Posts: 1,065
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

Or one way to solve the stress on the rear brakes and still enjoy the good times would be a roll control kit(AKA line lock). Plus that would eliminate the hard dump on the clutch to. Since you would only have to control 2 pedals instead of 3. You can just easy it out till it starts to engage, and ta da. SMOKE (hopefully from the tires and not the clutch) Jegs sell a complete kit that's easy to install and use. A friend of mine has this kit on his 600hp LS1 camaro and It hold it very nicely.
http://www.jegs.com/p/JEGS/805233/10002/-1
stealthy '69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 02:38 PM   #15
tim21391
Registered User
 
tim21391's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Salina, Kansas
Posts: 1,998
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

i did that in the snow in my eclipse and burnt my clutch so i wouldnt try it
__________________
1972 C-10...402/400..flowmaster 40 series
1967 Mustang 347 stroker/C-4
1966 Mustang 289/3-speed
2013 Mustang V6/6speed w/300 ponies
I may be 23, but i sure do knows 67-72s are sexy!
Its not MPG its smiles per gallon!
build started 11/25/08
build thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=2993796
tim21391 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 04:04 PM   #16
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

this isn't as detrimental as everyone makes it sound. It is no worse for the brakes than in an automatic doing a burn out.
You'll do more damage to your tires than anything else.
Your described method is all wrong though.
Left foot on clutch to the floor.
Right heal on brake, toe on throttle. Bring the rpms up to about 1500 - 2000, and bring the clutch pedal up. Don't just pop the clutch, that's when parts fly, but bring it up fairly quick. Then move your left foot to the brake while staying in the throttle.
You don't want to mash the brake pedal, you just want to keep enough pressure to keep the truck in place.
Same on the throttle, you don't want to floor it, just keep the RPMs up around 2500 - 3500 once the tires start spinning.

This is all pointless unless you are warming up slicks at the starting line.
If on street tires, you aren't helping much at all. just a quick 10 foot burn out is all you need to knock the gravel out of the tread. (go around the bleach box if on street tires) You will be AMAZED at how quick you'll kill street tires.

Seems no one knows how to do this anymore. When I was in highschool, you weren't considered a car guy untill you could manage this... even in a 4 cylinder S-10, doing this in a stick shift made you OK in car circles.

Last edited by Longhorn Man; 04-21-2009 at 04:06 PM.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 07:36 PM   #17
69halfton
Registered User
 
69halfton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: King City, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 974
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

longhornman beat me to it.

..what he said, plus dumping the clutch then slamming on the brakes is not only hard on stuff, but it also looks really stupid

ive done a fair number of brake stands in my truck, and the drums dont seem to be wearing too fast, the whole thing that kills brakes is heat, if you dont stand for too long, the brakes wont get too hot, thus saving your brakes (for what its worth).

also, letting the truck just roll forward slowly, helps to keep a very minimal amount of rear brake pressure on, saving brakes, and its easier on your tires.

__________________
- Jason

If you can turn, Youre not going fast enough.

Favorite caption:

first car to 200 mph in the 1/4 mile, no parachute, drum brakes all the way around..
..back when men were men.

Last edited by 69halfton; 04-21-2009 at 07:36 PM.
69halfton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 08:19 PM   #18
oldblue1968chevy
Grandpa in the rustmobile...
 
oldblue1968chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Spokane WA/Viola TN
Posts: 11,422
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

i just did this today...lol

how longhorn man said it..made some nice black marks in front of the house and gf telling me to stop and hoped id get a ticket lol
__________________
John

Goose-1968 C10 355,9.32-1CR, Vortec Heads ,262 voodoo, 3.73:1 3OTT (HS ride/beater/farm truck)
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=317684

Grams 53-1953 Chevrolet Belair
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1#post4327784

1969 Chevy C10 Shortbed 4.5/6?" Frame off resto
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=548136

1999 Toyota Tacoma 4x4
oldblue1968chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 08:28 PM   #19
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

it takes a few times to get it right, but once you do, you'll amaze your friends.
I did it a few weeks ago for the first time in 15 years or so.... and it all came back to me instantly.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 08:52 PM   #20
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,852
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

Itdefinately puts alot of stress on everything from the clutch on through the drivetrain.The brakes would be the least of my concern.They won`t break,just wear faster.That`s why I asked if he was only concerned about his brakes.To me it`s awfully lame to have to put that much effort into doing a burnout,especially in a light in the rear pickup.If you ain`t got the juice you got nothing to show off.It`s like cutting real hard pulling out,finding a patch of loose stones,or a wet spot to make a one legger spin.I`m always impressed,but not in a positive way.It`s called tryin`too hard,IMO.What`s cool is a ride turning both tires effortlessly.
I don`t think it`s the stray hairs on my nose.I elt the same when I was young.
But,as always,that`s me and if that`s what rocks your boat...
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~

Last edited by special-K; 04-21-2009 at 08:54 PM.
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 09:21 PM   #21
Skirkpat
Registered User
 
Skirkpat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: K.C. Missouri
Posts: 1,024
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

Quote:
Originally Posted by special-K View Post
Itdefinately puts alot of stress on everything from the clutch on through the drivetrain.The brakes would be the least of my concern.They won`t break,just wear faster.That`s why I asked if he was only concerned about his brakes.To me it`s awfully lame to have to put that much effort into doing a burnout,especially in a light in the rear pickup.If you ain`t got the juice you got nothing to show off.It`s like cutting real hard pulling out,finding a patch of loose stones,or a wet spot to make a one legger spin.I`m always impressed,but not in a positive way.It`s called tryin`too hard,IMO.What`s cool is a ride turning both tires effortlessly.
I don`t think it`s the stray hairs on my nose.I elt the same when I was young.
But,as always,that`s me and if that`s what rocks your boat...
I agree...the last car I had with the heart to spin them was a 2003 Cobra Convertible...I guess with an Eaton Blower you only look for the brakes at the end of the burnout
Skirkpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-21-2009, 09:06 PM   #22
texanidiot25
Eat My Rust
 
texanidiot25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cypress, Texas
Posts: 3,362
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

Honestly, once you brake the tire(s) loose, there is less load on the drive train then there is when your accelerating.

When the tires loose traction, there is a ton less friction between the road and tire, hense why skidding and spinning tires is not the fastest way to stop and start. Once you initiate the burn out, you have less load on the drivetrain than you would accelerating with full traction. Also why car's tend to break parts on a launch, not the burn out.

This is why you can hit third gear at say, 25mph instead of 70mph, or what have you. With the lack of traction, thus less resistance to the drivetrain, everything can spin faster, easier, and thus, burn rubber.

The most stressful part is breaking traction, but if you get good, this takes nothing.


The Fastest thing to wear is tires. The next is brakes. Watch your RPMs and don't get too excited, letting them climb too high.

And I loved the posi burnouts my truck used to pull when I 1st started driving it. Nothing like holding a 4500 lbs truck at a 20 degree angle for 100 feet.... Sadly I can't ever get it to do a posi one much That, and don't care to tear up the new tires much.

Last edited by texanidiot25; 04-21-2009 at 09:09 PM.
texanidiot25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2009, 12:26 AM   #23
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,852
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

Quote:
Originally Posted by texanidiot25 View Post
Honestly, once you brake the tire(s) loose, there is less load on the drive train then there is when your accelerating.

When the tires loose traction, there is a ton less friction between the road and tire, hense why skidding and spinning tires is not the fastest way to stop and start. Once you initiate the burn out, you have less load on the drivetrain than you would accelerating with full traction. Also why car's tend to break parts on a launch, not the burn out.

This is why you can hit third gear at say, 25mph instead of 70mph, or what have you. With the lack of traction, thus less resistance to the drivetrain, everything can spin faster, easier, and thus, burn rubber.

The most stressful part is breaking traction, but if you get good, this takes nothing.

YouTube - CST10 Burnouts

The Fastest thing to wear is tires. The next is brakes. Watch your RPMs and don't get too excited, letting them climb too high.

And I loved the posi burnouts my truck used to pull when I 1st started driving it. Nothing like holding a 4500 lbs truck at a 20 degree angle for 100 feet.... Sadly I can't ever get it to do a posi one much That, and don't care to tear up the new tires much.
The problem is not once the wheels are spinning,obvious and agreed.The problem is before that when the motor/trans is trying to turn what you are holding back.Envision twisting when one end wants to go one speed and the other end is resisting.That is stress.That is where it is like accelerating...up a steep hill with a load of bricks.
The other stress is in the form of shock when dumping the clutch and all at once a motor turning 3,000 rpm connects to the tires,not only sitting still with a good part of a ton sitting on them,but being held by brakes.The splines,yokes,shafts,u-joints,gears,studs all take sress they are not intended to take.The biggest problem isn`t wear,it`s breakage.
There`s less stress if you had 500 hp and just hit it.All the stress is in that single moment when still becomes motion.The more hp the less resistance at the road.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~

Last edited by special-K; 04-22-2009 at 12:30 AM.
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2009, 01:02 AM   #24
Hoffman65burb
Registered User
 
Hoffman65burb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 448
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

In my 89 sierra, we disconnected the rear brakes, plugged the brake lines, roasted off some tires we found in the back of our school's shop, great fun. There is this kid in my class, his parents bought him an 98 or so ranger, 6 cyl 5 speed 4x4, beutiful truck. he dumps the clutch all the time, brake stands everywhere, redlines every damn shift. Some times puts it in 4 high and trys to spin all 4 tires. So far he has blown his transfer case, both cv shafts, blew up his rear end going down the highway, clutch and flext plate just in peices, and had to replace his door since he hit a pole trying to drift it in 4 high. This is just an example of one of those kids that take what he has for granted. Hate to see that truck go to waste
__________________
1978 GMC Jimmy
454bbc
Turbo400
NP205
3.73 gears
4inch lift
33's
Hoffman65burb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-22-2009, 01:25 AM   #25
highperf4x4
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 4,709
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts

pppffffttt. It's all small stuff!

I did it the same way longhorn describes it. And I felt the need to do it as often as possible !!

You wanna talk about stress, we used to do the reverse slams in the automatics!!!!! Wind it up in reverse and then slam it in 1st with the pedal on the floor!!!! We had contests to see who could make the biggest checkmarks





We all had our own toolboxes and part supplies too..........................

Last edited by highperf4x4; 04-22-2009 at 01:26 AM.
highperf4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com