Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
04-21-2009, 10:01 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sparta, MI
Posts: 446
|
Stupid Question about burnouts
i have a 3 speed manual rear wheel drive. it has disks in the front and drums in the back. will revving it up, dumping the clutch, and holding down the break damage the rear brake? i have enough power to do it, but i am worried about damaging the rear brake drums.
__________________
1972 longbed- 454 1967 shortbed- 355 |
04-21-2009, 10:12 AM | #2 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,852
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
Yeah,why wouldn`t it?Are the brakes all you`re concerned about?
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
04-21-2009, 10:15 AM | #3 |
Senior Moment
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pittsburg Ca
Posts: 4,168
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
Think about it. You’re trying to stop your wheels by holding down the brake but they continue to spin because you’re pouring the coals to it. You'll be replacing brake shoes more often at the least not to mention the strain you’re putting on the rest of the brake parts.
__________________
1970 CST LS 1 6 speed Ford 9 inch Detroit Tru Track, Dakota Didgital, Vintage Air, QA1 Coil Overs Front & Rear Lots of FUN 2013 GMC PU, Oldest Son 71 GMC LWB. QA1 Suspension, Angry SB. Youngest Son 2019 GMC Diesil Dually. Youngest Son 2017 Toyota SUV Daughters car 2018 Traverse , Wife’s Ride Pittsburg Ca 94565 |
04-21-2009, 10:16 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sparta, MI
Posts: 446
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
thats what i thought
__________________
1972 longbed- 454 1967 shortbed- 355 |
04-21-2009, 10:20 AM | #5 |
dazed and confused
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: marion nc
Posts: 1,649
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
you could buy a line loc to lock the front brakes and it will do better burnouts
__________________
members met: redbaron69, billsbowtie,nc67 |
04-21-2009, 10:26 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Sparta, MI
Posts: 446
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
i read about that, how much are they?
__________________
1972 longbed- 454 1967 shortbed- 355 |
04-21-2009, 10:35 AM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: K.C. Missouri
Posts: 1,024
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
Why not buy a P.O.S. truck to tear up, and keep your nicer one for driving like you care about it? or you could just pull it up to a brick wall if you like spinning a tire, it is easier on the brakes?
|
04-21-2009, 10:58 AM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: K.C. Missouri
Posts: 1,024
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
My God, I have tuned into my father.....I think I see a nose hair...LOL
|
04-21-2009, 11:41 AM | #9 |
AMERICAN IRON ADDICT
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 299
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
The other thing to consider is the rear end. If it's a open rear, your just spinning the right rear and gear oil isn't traveling to the axle bearings or side gears. After a period of time damage can occur. A posi is better as both axles are spinning and the carrier is operating the same as driving down the road. I would second the line loc idea and keep the other info in the back of your mind. Breaking stuff is just part of the fun!!
|
04-21-2009, 01:00 PM | #10 | |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,852
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
Quote:
Heck,why not mount a couple bleach jugs upside down in the bed in front of the tires (tire?) with a release cable so you can make a puddle to smoke out bigtime?
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ Last edited by special-K; 04-21-2009 at 01:01 PM. |
|
04-22-2009, 08:36 AM | #11 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Twin Falls, Idaho
Posts: 33
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
Quote:
That's funny!
__________________
1970 C10 LWB 292 inline. 1969 C10 LWB 250 inline. Pants on the floor.... |
|
04-21-2009, 10:36 AM | #12 |
'69 Chevy SWB
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Surprise, Az
Posts: 1,065
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
|
04-21-2009, 09:35 PM | #13 | |
I really hate wet sanding!
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brookfield, MO
Posts: 601
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
Quote:
With the peg leg rear, do not think you really need to apply brakes at all to get the rear tire (1) to spin. |
|
04-21-2009, 10:35 AM | #14 |
'69 Chevy SWB
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Surprise, Az
Posts: 1,065
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
Or one way to solve the stress on the rear brakes and still enjoy the good times would be a roll control kit(AKA line lock). Plus that would eliminate the hard dump on the clutch to. Since you would only have to control 2 pedals instead of 3. You can just easy it out till it starts to engage, and ta da. SMOKE (hopefully from the tires and not the clutch) Jegs sell a complete kit that's easy to install and use. A friend of mine has this kit on his 600hp LS1 camaro and It hold it very nicely.
http://www.jegs.com/p/JEGS/805233/10002/-1 |
04-21-2009, 02:38 PM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Salina, Kansas
Posts: 1,998
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
i did that in the snow in my eclipse and burnt my clutch so i wouldnt try it
__________________
1972 C-10...402/400..flowmaster 40 series 1967 Mustang 347 stroker/C-4 1966 Mustang 289/3-speed 2013 Mustang V6/6speed w/300 ponies I may be 23, but i sure do knows 67-72s are sexy! Its not MPG its smiles per gallon! build started 11/25/08 build thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=2993796 |
04-21-2009, 04:04 PM | #16 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
this isn't as detrimental as everyone makes it sound. It is no worse for the brakes than in an automatic doing a burn out.
You'll do more damage to your tires than anything else. Your described method is all wrong though. Left foot on clutch to the floor. Right heal on brake, toe on throttle. Bring the rpms up to about 1500 - 2000, and bring the clutch pedal up. Don't just pop the clutch, that's when parts fly, but bring it up fairly quick. Then move your left foot to the brake while staying in the throttle. You don't want to mash the brake pedal, you just want to keep enough pressure to keep the truck in place. Same on the throttle, you don't want to floor it, just keep the RPMs up around 2500 - 3500 once the tires start spinning. This is all pointless unless you are warming up slicks at the starting line. If on street tires, you aren't helping much at all. just a quick 10 foot burn out is all you need to knock the gravel out of the tread. (go around the bleach box if on street tires) You will be AMAZED at how quick you'll kill street tires. Seems no one knows how to do this anymore. When I was in highschool, you weren't considered a car guy untill you could manage this... even in a 4 cylinder S-10, doing this in a stick shift made you OK in car circles. Last edited by Longhorn Man; 04-21-2009 at 04:06 PM. |
04-21-2009, 07:36 PM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: King City, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 974
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
longhornman beat me to it.
..what he said, plus dumping the clutch then slamming on the brakes is not only hard on stuff, but it also looks really stupid ive done a fair number of brake stands in my truck, and the drums dont seem to be wearing too fast, the whole thing that kills brakes is heat, if you dont stand for too long, the brakes wont get too hot, thus saving your brakes (for what its worth). also, letting the truck just roll forward slowly, helps to keep a very minimal amount of rear brake pressure on, saving brakes, and its easier on your tires.
__________________
- Jason If you can turn, Youre not going fast enough. Favorite caption: first car to 200 mph in the 1/4 mile, no parachute, drum brakes all the way around.. ..back when men were men. Last edited by 69halfton; 04-21-2009 at 07:36 PM. |
04-21-2009, 08:19 PM | #18 |
Grandpa in the rustmobile...
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Spokane WA/Viola TN
Posts: 11,422
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
i just did this today...lol
how longhorn man said it..made some nice black marks in front of the house and gf telling me to stop and hoped id get a ticket lol
__________________
John Goose-1968 C10 355,9.32-1CR, Vortec Heads ,262 voodoo, 3.73:1 3OTT (HS ride/beater/farm truck) http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=317684 Grams 53-1953 Chevrolet Belair http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1#post4327784 1969 Chevy C10 Shortbed 4.5/6?" Frame off resto http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=548136 1999 Toyota Tacoma 4x4 |
04-21-2009, 08:28 PM | #19 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
it takes a few times to get it right, but once you do, you'll amaze your friends.
I did it a few weeks ago for the first time in 15 years or so.... and it all came back to me instantly. |
04-21-2009, 08:52 PM | #20 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,852
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
Itdefinately puts alot of stress on everything from the clutch on through the drivetrain.The brakes would be the least of my concern.They won`t break,just wear faster.That`s why I asked if he was only concerned about his brakes.To me it`s awfully lame to have to put that much effort into doing a burnout,especially in a light in the rear pickup.If you ain`t got the juice you got nothing to show off.It`s like cutting real hard pulling out,finding a patch of loose stones,or a wet spot to make a one legger spin.I`m always impressed,but not in a positive way.It`s called tryin`too hard,IMO.What`s cool is a ride turning both tires effortlessly.
I don`t think it`s the stray hairs on my nose.I elt the same when I was young. But,as always,that`s me and if that`s what rocks your boat...
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ Last edited by special-K; 04-21-2009 at 08:54 PM. |
04-21-2009, 09:21 PM | #21 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: K.C. Missouri
Posts: 1,024
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
Quote:
|
|
04-21-2009, 09:06 PM | #22 |
Eat My Rust
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cypress, Texas
Posts: 3,362
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
Honestly, once you brake the tire(s) loose, there is less load on the drive train then there is when your accelerating.
When the tires loose traction, there is a ton less friction between the road and tire, hense why skidding and spinning tires is not the fastest way to stop and start. Once you initiate the burn out, you have less load on the drivetrain than you would accelerating with full traction. Also why car's tend to break parts on a launch, not the burn out. This is why you can hit third gear at say, 25mph instead of 70mph, or what have you. With the lack of traction, thus less resistance to the drivetrain, everything can spin faster, easier, and thus, burn rubber. The most stressful part is breaking traction, but if you get good, this takes nothing. The Fastest thing to wear is tires. The next is brakes. Watch your RPMs and don't get too excited, letting them climb too high. And I loved the posi burnouts my truck used to pull when I 1st started driving it. Nothing like holding a 4500 lbs truck at a 20 degree angle for 100 feet.... Sadly I can't ever get it to do a posi one much That, and don't care to tear up the new tires much. Last edited by texanidiot25; 04-21-2009 at 09:09 PM. |
04-22-2009, 12:26 AM | #23 | |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,852
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
Quote:
The other stress is in the form of shock when dumping the clutch and all at once a motor turning 3,000 rpm connects to the tires,not only sitting still with a good part of a ton sitting on them,but being held by brakes.The splines,yokes,shafts,u-joints,gears,studs all take sress they are not intended to take.The biggest problem isn`t wear,it`s breakage. There`s less stress if you had 500 hp and just hit it.All the stress is in that single moment when still becomes motion.The more hp the less resistance at the road.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ Last edited by special-K; 04-22-2009 at 12:30 AM. |
|
04-22-2009, 01:02 AM | #24 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 448
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
In my 89 sierra, we disconnected the rear brakes, plugged the brake lines, roasted off some tires we found in the back of our school's shop, great fun. There is this kid in my class, his parents bought him an 98 or so ranger, 6 cyl 5 speed 4x4, beutiful truck. he dumps the clutch all the time, brake stands everywhere, redlines every damn shift. Some times puts it in 4 high and trys to spin all 4 tires. So far he has blown his transfer case, both cv shafts, blew up his rear end going down the highway, clutch and flext plate just in peices, and had to replace his door since he hit a pole trying to drift it in 4 high. This is just an example of one of those kids that take what he has for granted. Hate to see that truck go to waste
__________________
1978 GMC Jimmy 454bbc Turbo400 NP205 3.73 gears 4inch lift 33's |
04-22-2009, 01:25 AM | #25 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 4,709
|
Re: Stupid Question about burnouts
pppffffttt. It's all small stuff!
I did it the same way longhorn describes it. And I felt the need to do it as often as possible !! You wanna talk about stress, we used to do the reverse slams in the automatics!!!!! Wind it up in reverse and then slam it in 1st with the pedal on the floor!!!! We had contests to see who could make the biggest checkmarks We all had our own toolboxes and part supplies too.......................... Last edited by highperf4x4; 04-22-2009 at 01:26 AM. |
Bookmarks |
|
|