63 C 10 it begins - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

Craven Moorhead · 08-04-2009, 12:27 PM

Here it is after getting it home, picked up an 80 front end including brake booster and all power steering components, looking for a 71/72 five lug rear.
Measured the suspension and arrived at the following Plan 2.5” drop spindles and –2” springs in the front, going to c notch the rear with +2” blocks –3” springs. Any comments on that set up or recommendations feel free to chime in.

MacAttack · 08-04-2009, 12:53 PM

Very nice truck!

72BlckButy · 08-04-2009, 02:13 PM

Great looking '65, good luck with the build!

**aerotruk63** · 08-04-2009, 02:48 PM

"63" is there any year better? Good luck with your truck.

Joemomma1 · 08-04-2009, 04:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aerotruk63

"63" is there any year better? Good luck with your truck.

Yes...actually 3 years. 64,65,66.

63deluxfleet · 08-05-2009, 12:01 AM

..

63deluxfleet · 08-05-2009, 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joemomma1

Yes...actually 3 years. 64,65,66.

yea rite 63 is the best year nice grille with the wrap around windshield and the dash has way more character the front windshields on 64-66 look retarded. also the triangular door tops yuccck

**Captainfab** · 08-05-2009, 01:03 AM

Welcome to the board

Post up some pics when you get started on her.

And Oh Yeah......'63's are best

Joemomma1 · 08-05-2009, 03:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 63deluxfleet

yea rite 63 is the best year nice grille with the wrap around windshield and the dash has way more character the front windshields on 64-66 look retarded. also the triangular door tops yuccck

Well you obviously have no sense of taste nor have you ever had the pleasure of owning a 64-66. You just gave the 2 reasons (dash, winshield) why the 60-63 are stupid ugly. Now dont take this as an attack I was just answering a question. I will now state the obvious, all that matters is what you like.

**ChiefRocka** · 08-05-2009, 06:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aerotruk63

"63" is there any year better? Good luck with your truck.

So far haven't found one....The 63's are in a class all there own. Old-school looking dash/windshield and OG grill.

First for coils and common chassis.

4,5,6....they are all the same !!

BC Pappy · 08-10-2009, 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joemomma1

Well you obviously have no sense of taste nor have you ever had the pleasure of owning a 64-66. You just gave the 2 reasons (dash, winshield) why the 60-63 are stupid ugly. Now dont take this as an attack I was just answering a question. I will now state the obvious, all that matters is what you like.

I totally agree! I love my '65. It is the only year for me. But I appreciate the style and character of all vintage trucks!

Tx Firefighter · 08-04-2009, 04:28 PM

I'd go straight to 5 inch rear springs rather than 3 inch plus 2 inch blocks. The 3 and 5 inch springs cost the same money. Plus, the lowering blocks get the bottom of the u bolts near the scrub line and can look a bit funny from the rear view.

Craven Moorhead · 08-04-2009, 05:08 PM

Thanks Guys

Kevin:
The reason I was considering a block and spring combo was to try and optimize travel and not compromise the ride as much but the scrub line consideration is a good point. Do you feel like there is an optimum combo when considering use and ride quality when lowering to this point, like 1” blocks and – 4” springs? Just springs would be easier. I want to lower the truck conventionally (no air bags) as low as possible and still have the suspension work reasonably well.

blackmopar · 08-04-2009, 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craven Moorhead

Thanks Guys

Kevin:
The reason I was considering a block and spring combo was to try and optimize travel and not compromise the ride as much but the scrub line consideration is a good point. Do you feel like there is an optimum combo when considering use and ride quality when lowering to this point, like 1” blocks and – 4” springs? Just springs would be easier. I want to lower the truck conventionally (no air bags) as low as possible and still have the suspension work reasonably well.

im at 4 inch lower coils and no ride compromise - i wish i woulda gone 5 - get the 5inch hd/tow coils and you should still be abel to pull a wagon

Tx Firefighter · 08-04-2009, 06:57 PM

First, let me say, I have lowered all of my trucks for the last 20 years (probably 8 of them). I always go straight to 6 inch springs. If I am towing a trailer pretty often, 5 inch springs. After my divorce, I parted out a lot of motorcycles for extra cash. I hauled Goldwings even in the bed of my step side with 6 inch springs. It would bottom sometimes with a huge bike like that, but anything lighter never a bump.

Craven Moorhead · 08-04-2009, 07:02 PM

Thanks for the insight sounds like the -5 springs are the way to go then.

Craven Moorhead · 08-10-2009, 12:44 PM

I found a guy with a stock pile of 71/72 rear ends, anything in particular to look for? I want a posi unit but they are all sealed and he does not want me to open them up. Anyone have any part numbers I could identify them by?
Thanks

**aerotruk63** · 08-11-2009, 06:10 AM

If you rotate the yoke on the pinion and the two axels rotate in the same direction it should be a Positraction unit. If they rotate in opposite the direction to each other you have a one wheel wonder.

Craven Moorhead · 08-11-2009, 08:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aerotruk63

If you rotate the yoke on the pinion and the two axels rotate in the same direction it should be a Positraction unit. If they rotate in opposite the direction to each other you have a one wheel wonder.

I thought that was the case on a locker I did not know if it was the same for a posi unit due to the clutches.
Thanks

Craven Moorhead · 08-21-2009, 04:36 PM

Picked up a 71/72 rear end for it today 100 bucks. I found a guy with a stock pile of Chevy truck parts. He said many of the yards scrapped everything when scrap was high he kept it all.

1Bad62Pro/Street · 08-21-2009, 04:41 PM

what's the lenght?

Craven Moorhead · 08-21-2009, 05:50 PM

Approximately 58.5" axle flange to axle flange, the vin says its a 72 3.07:1 open. Nothing special but it is all there in good condition.

**Captainfab** · 08-22-2009, 12:13 AM

That doesn't sound right. It should be right at 63 1/2" IIRC

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craven Moorhead

Approximately 58.5" axle flange to axle flange, the vin says its a 72 3.07:1 open. Nothing special but it is all there in good condition.

Craven Moorhead · 08-22-2009, 10:35 AM

Where exactly are you measuring and I will measure it again, I measured from the axle tube flange to axle tube flange to 58.5" I get 63.625" drum face to drum face.

**Captainfab** · 08-23-2009, 12:48 AM

WMS to WMS (wheel mounting surface) is the correct way to measure the width of a differential. That's the same as drum face to drum face

So I said 63.5, you say 63.625.....that's only .125 difference between us.....close enough.

The 58.5 sounds more like the housing width/length.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Craven Moorhead

Where exactly are you measuring and I will measure it again, I measured from the axle tube flange to axle tube flange to 58.5" I get 63.625" drum face to drum face.

08-04-2009, 12:27 PM	#1
Craven Moorhead Registered User Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Milwaukee Posts: 22	63 C 10 it begins Here it is after getting it home, picked up an 80 front end including brake booster and all power steering components, looking for a 71/72 five lug rear. Measured the suspension and arrived at the following Plan 2.5” drop spindles and –2” springs in the front, going to c notch the rear with +2” blocks –3” springs. Any comments on that set up or recommendations feel free to chime in. Attached Images Last edited by Craven Moorhead; 08-22-2009 at 03:41 PM. Reason: pics

08-04-2009, 12:53 PM	#2
MacAttack 283 Drama Queen Join Date: Dec 2004 Location: Surf City, CA Posts: 2,435	Re: 63 C 10 it begins Very nice truck! Attached Images __________________ For about 12 years of my adult life I had a severe speech impediment. My ex-wife never let me get a word in edgewise.

08-04-2009, 02:13 PM	#3
72BlckButy Tot Roddin' Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Mid-MO Posts: 24,461	Re: 63 C 10 it begins Great looking '65, good luck with the build! __________________ -Nate 1969 CST SWB - Project Blank Slate (4.5/6" ECE Static Drop, 6-lug disc brake upgrade (manual), Billet Specialties Vintec 20x8.5 255/40 (F) 20x10 295/40 (R), 250 I-6) 1960 AMF Skylark - Tot Roddin' (Lowered with custom frame; soon to include custom push bar and interior) 2008 Silverado CrewCab 1LT (5.3L, 3:73, 4x4, LT1, Z-71, Towing Package)

08-04-2009, 02:48 PM	#4
aerotruk63 Check The Champ, Demonstrator Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Montreal,Quebec Posts: 6,627	Re: 63 C 10 it begins "63" is there any year better? Good luck with your truck. __________________ 1963 *Chevrolet Truck* Literature LINK: https://picasaweb.google.com/113840717762774560215 YouTube Channel with 20+ Original *Chevrolet Truck* Salesmen, Mechanics & Service Department Training Slideshows. https://www.youtube.com/results?sear...otruk63&page=1

08-05-2009, 12:01 AM	#6
63deluxfleet Registered User Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: dinuba, ca Posts: 623	Re: 63 C 10 it begins .. __________________ A girl phoned me the other day and said... Come on over, there's nobody home. I went over. Nobody was home. -Rodney Dangerfield .......THE ROAD TO HELL IS PAVED WITH GOOD INTENTIONS..... Last edited by 63deluxfleet; 08-05-2009 at 12:04 AM. Reason: bad spelling

08-05-2009, 01:03 AM	#8
Captainfab 60-66 Nut Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho Posts: 23,248	Re: 63 C 10 it begins Welcome to the board Post up some pics when you get started on her. And Oh Yeah......'63's are best __________________ Power Steering Box Adapter Plates For Sale HERE Power Brake Booster Adapter Brackets For Sale '63-'66 HERE and '67-'72 HERE and '60-'62 HERE and "60-'62 with clutch HERE Rear Disc Brake Brackets For Sale. Impala SS calipers HERE Camaro Calipers HERE D52 Calipers HERE 6 Lug HERE Hydroboost Mounting Plates HERE

08-04-2009, 04:28 PM	#12
Tx Firefighter Watch out for your cornhole ! Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Azle, Texas Posts: 14,162	Re: 63 C 10 it begins I'd go straight to 5 inch rear springs rather than 3 inch plus 2 inch blocks. The 3 and 5 inch springs cost the same money. Plus, the lowering blocks get the bottom of the u bolts near the scrub line and can look a bit funny from the rear view. __________________ I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin

08-04-2009, 05:08 PM	#13
Craven Moorhead Registered User Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Milwaukee Posts: 22	Re: 63 C 10 it begins Thanks Guys Kevin: The reason I was considering a block and spring combo was to try and optimize travel and not compromise the ride as much but the scrub line consideration is a good point. Do you feel like there is an optimum combo when considering use and ride quality when lowering to this point, like 1” blocks and – 4” springs? Just springs would be easier. I want to lower the truck conventionally (no air bags) as low as possible and still have the suspension work reasonably well.

08-04-2009, 06:57 PM	#15
Tx Firefighter Watch out for your cornhole ! Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Azle, Texas Posts: 14,162	Re: 63 C 10 it begins First, let me say, I have lowered all of my trucks for the last 20 years (probably 8 of them). I always go straight to 6 inch springs. If I am towing a trailer pretty often, 5 inch springs. After my divorce, I parted out a lot of motorcycles for extra cash. I hauled Goldwings even in the bed of my step side with 6 inch springs. It would bottom sometimes with a huge bike like that, but anything lighter never a bump. __________________ I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin

08-04-2009, 07:02 PM	#16
Craven Moorhead Registered User Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Milwaukee Posts: 22	Re: 63 C 10 it begins Thanks for the insight sounds like the -5 springs are the way to go then.

08-10-2009, 12:44 PM	#17
Craven Moorhead Registered User Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Milwaukee Posts: 22	Re: 63 C 10 it begins I found a guy with a stock pile of 71/72 rear ends, anything in particular to look for? I want a posi unit but they are all sealed and he does not want me to open them up. Anyone have any part numbers I could identify them by? Thanks

08-11-2009, 06:10 AM	#18
aerotruk63 Check The Champ, Demonstrator Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Montreal,Quebec Posts: 6,627	Re: 63 C 10 it begins If you rotate the yoke on the pinion and the two axels rotate in the same direction it should be a Positraction unit. If they rotate in opposite the direction to each other you have a one wheel wonder. __________________ 1963 *Chevrolet Truck* Literature LINK: https://picasaweb.google.com/113840717762774560215 YouTube Channel with 20+ Original *Chevrolet Truck* Salesmen, Mechanics & Service Department Training Slideshows. https://www.youtube.com/results?sear...otruk63&page=1

08-21-2009, 04:36 PM	#20
Craven Moorhead Registered User Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Milwaukee Posts: 22	Re: 63 C 10 it begins Picked up a 71/72 rear end for it today 100 bucks. I found a guy with a stock pile of Chevy truck parts. He said many of the yards scrapped everything when scrap was high he kept it all.

08-21-2009, 04:41 PM	#21
1Bad62Pro/Street "Where were you in '62?" Join Date: Jul 2004 Location: Cleveland County, North Cackalacky Posts: 5,013	Re: 63 C 10 it begins what's the lenght? __________________ PROJECT: "FULL METAL YELLOW JACKET" 1962 Chevy C-10 Stepside Shortbed Nostalgia Pro/Street Pickup Truck PROJECT: "FULL METAL YELLOW JACKET Build Thread What Are You Workin' On? - 1Bad62ChevyPickup PROJECT: "TYRANNORAMBLER REX" 1969 AMC Rambler American Nostalgia Pro/Street Youtube Channel: Father Son Projects Youtube Channel: 2TIMOTHY2FITHTEEN "North and South Carolina Folks Click Here!" (((( ~ I have Parts For Sale & Miscellaneous Stuff ~ )))) "Well being as there's no other place around the place, I reckon this must be the place, I reckon...Nyuk Nyuk Nyuk" -Curly Howard Ph.D.

08-21-2009, 05:50 PM	#22
Craven Moorhead Registered User Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Milwaukee Posts: 22	Re: 63 C 10 it begins Approximately 58.5" axle flange to axle flange, the vin says its a 72 3.07:1 open. Nothing special but it is all there in good condition.



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

08-22-2009, 10:35 AM	#24
Craven Moorhead Registered User Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Milwaukee Posts: 22	Re: 63 C 10 it begins Where exactly are you measuring and I will measure it again, I measured from the axle tube flange to axle tube flange to 58.5" I get 63.625" drum face to drum face. Last edited by Craven Moorhead; 08-22-2009 at 10:54 AM. Reason: more info

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.