![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kaufman,Texas
Posts: 102
|
![]()
I recently picked up a short frame rolling chassis and noticed that the cross member where the trans. support bolts is a lot less heavy duty than the one on a long bed. Is this standard for a short frame? Can it be changed to the heavier one? Why are there two types? Thanks, Shawn
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Loveland Co.
Posts: 3,098
|
Re: Cross member question
It looks like someone cut the brackets off that go to the top of the frame to make it easier to remove. Auto trans crossmembers are the same regardless of wheelbase. I'd swap yours in.
__________________
Chris 74 Custom Deluxe SWB 350/350/3.73’s 99 2wd Silverado RCSB 5.3/4L60/3.90’s http://www.classictrucks.com/feature...short_bed.html |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 2,696
|
Re: Cross member question
Camaros, and probably other cars had ones similar to that.
I've often thought about putting something a little easier to remove in there. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
Re: Cross member question
someone removed the upper legs off the crossmember.
I would swap them out and install the good one. This piece does help stiffin things up a tad bit, even though it is a PITA to remove. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|