Saw this at Pate - 64/98 custom

[SuperWho]

Thoughts???

[spr85gmc]

[Slow Build]

Originally Posted by spr85gmc

x2

[Vernski]

To each his own but it just weird's me out nothing seems to look good together and nothing flows I know it's just a bad dream and I will wake up sooner or latter and i hope it's soon. JMO....Vernski

[fryer1979]

Not a fan. I know the automotive world is heavy in personal taste, but to me these hybrids destroy the lines that make the classics so beautiful.

[andyspinstriping]

I couldn't have said it any better...

Originally Posted by fryer1979

Not a fan. I know the automotive world is heavy in personal taste, but to me these hybrids destroy the lines that make the classics so beautiful.

[protrash64]

.....one of these things rears it's ugly head again.

[SuperWho]

It had a big SOLD sign in the window. Someone liked it. Not me. The lines were all wrong. To each his own though.

[markeb01]

It’s interesting, but seems like a lot of work and money to create something that’s neither fish nor fowl. Kind of like the VW beetles with the Rolls Royce front ends years ago.

[K-TEN]

Woof! I suppose that imitation is the highest form of flattery, but I own a 90 Sportside which I really like and have owned since new. The Sportside look is ruined and the target isn't hit for the 60's look. The roof is particularly heinous. The front fender is just weird. It's something, and I'm sure the owner is proud. but Golly.....it's UUUUgleeee!

[aerotruk63]

Smile and nod!

[66Freak]

Not a fan!

[LILRED66]

Hideous!

[lakeroadster]

It's got a bad case of "hobo" hair.

What a lot of work! IMHO if the cab would have been left alone (stock 98 roof profile) it would look pretty good. Hell, I would drive it!

But then people have always said I am about a half bubble off plumb

It would be interesting to see under the hood, inside the fenders, etc. where all the mod's were made..... just to see the quality (or lack there of?) of the mod's.

[Rich 5150 69]

Not a fan of it....

[markeb01]

Originally Posted by lakeroadster

It's got a bad case of "hobo" hair.

It really is the roof that doesn't work, almost like a badly fitting toupee. The rest of the truck looks like a lot of design thought went into it, and then everyone got tired and wanted to go home so they just plopped something on top and called it quits.

[Bears63]

I appreciate all the work that went into it, but the lines are just all wrong. It just looks goofy.

[Winola73]

I can appreciate the work they put into it but as someone posted above, "just because you can doesn't mean you should".

[Doogie]

what an abortion, would rather walk................ wast of a 64 parts

[GMCMG]

I respect the amount of thought and work that had to go into making that abomination. Past that, I love the 60-66s AS THEY ARE because they are just d*mn sexy (wish my wife had lines like my truck)!!! This is right there with defacing art. Why is it that the more money someone has (that project couldn't have been cheap), the less taste they have???

[McC_65_91]

I personally would drive it...but never buy or build it. cool concept, but wow, its ugly. still respect to the work that it took though

[Rogue]

Vomit!

[63 & 64 Bowties]

I can't tell from the pic, is that a S-10? If so, I've seen that done before. I think there's a kit that someone makes.
Not my cup-o-tea either.

[Slow Build]

Found another one while surfing for pictures. Check this out, then check the next 8 pics (if you dare).

http://www.trucktrend.com/autoshows/...photo_145.html

[Vernski]

Originally Posted by Slow Build

Found another one while surfing for pictures. Check this out, then check the next 8 pics (if you dare).

http://www.trucktrend.com/autoshows/...photo_145.html

At least it's not as offensive as the one at Pate for some reason, till you get to the taillights and the green snake stuff. But oh well beauty is in the eye of the beholder and someone must like it just not me....Vernski