The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 99-06 GMT800 Chevy and GMC Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-02-2011, 11:16 PM   #1
biggsteve97
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 284
5.3L or LQ4 6.0L Dilemma

I have a dilemma. I have an 03 Z71 Tahoe with the flex fuel 5.3L with several bolt ons including long tube headers. My dilemma is I have a 2000 LQ4 6.0L sitting on an engine stand in my garage and I have been thinking about installing it in the Tahoe. It has the cast iron heads and supposedly has only 300hp. My 5.3L is roughly 295-300hp stock so I don't know if it would be a justifiable swap for the Tahoe. I know the 6.0L has atleast 30-35lb ft more tq than the 5.3L which would help move the heavy Tahoe a lot easier. I would like to keep the 4L60E and plan on doing a stage 3 build from PATC which will allow it to handle up to 600lb ft of tq since it seems to be dying anyway and especially if I decide to install the 6.0L. Anyone have any thoughts on this? Suggestions?
biggsteve97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2011, 02:29 PM   #2
Benelli
Watchin the rust grow
 
Benelli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Western Nebraska
Posts: 950
Re: 5.3L or LQ4 6.0L Dilemma

Well, what are you doing this for? Is this a daily driver? Do you pull heavy trailers? I mean, I just flat out don't see a reason to do this. What is your reasoning? If your after more power I'm sure theres a few other things you could do to improve your 5.3.

IMO a 5.3 to a 6.0 swap doesn't seem to justify the trouble.
__________________
1979 Chevy K10 (H/D Front end) - 350 w/ Holley Truck Avenger, Weinald Intake manifold, headers, bored .060 over, mild cam, Built up TH350 (TranStar Shift kit) with a part-timed NP203 t-case SOLD ($3,000)
1997 Chevy Silverado 1500 - 4.3 vortec, extended cab, 21 highway MPG, stock. "Red" SOLD ($3,000)
1987 Toyota 4wd Pick-up - work in progress, future DD SOLD ($1,850)
1998 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins 5spd Quad cab - old 12 valve with some work done
2004 Chevy Silverado - Black, 4x4, 5.3L, stock for now

Underneath that rust is a heart of gold
Benelli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2011, 04:33 PM   #3
biggsteve97
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 284
Re: 5.3L or LQ4 6.0L Dilemma

It does get used as a daily driver, weekend wheeler, occasional trailer, but mostly road trips to off road parks. I want more torque. On the 5.3L I already have a K&N cold air kit, Jet mass air flow sensor, Power Aid throttle body spacer, long tube "race tuned" headers with off road y-pipe and no cats, 3" dynomax cat back exhaust. Eventually Id like to do a custom tune but that is a little ways off for now. Highway speeds its awesome but from a dead stop till about 20mph it seems sluggish, granted no where near as sluggish as it was when I first bought it. I do not know the history of the 5.3L in my Tahoe but everything was original on the vehicle, and I do mean everything. One thing that does have me curious about the 5.3L is the oil pressure seems a little low at operating temp about 42psi at 2000rpm, I believe it should be closer to 60psi.
I already have the 6.0L it was given to me, has been well maintained and runs very strong. it is ready to drop in and i already know my current wiring harness is compatible with the engine so its just a plug and play swap.
hope i answered your question.

Last edited by biggsteve97; 05-03-2011 at 04:47 PM.
biggsteve97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2011, 04:44 PM   #4
Clyde65
1965 Chevy C10, 2005 4.8L/4l60
 
Clyde65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: DFW Texas
Posts: 8,546
Re: 5.3L or LQ4 6.0L Dilemma

You realize the 60e wont handle the torqe of the 6.0, right? even if you "beef" it up, it will not last long. You can get a respectable 400hp out of the 5.3 with a CAM and tune and still be able to pass emissions.

with the 6.0, a cam and a good tune you could have 500hp, but you need a HD tranny.

Good luck!
__________________
Clyde65

Rebuild of Clyde
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post8338184

69 Aristocrat Lo Liner build
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...84#post7561684



support our troops!
Clyde65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2011, 05:16 PM   #5
biggsteve97
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 284
Re: 5.3L or LQ4 6.0L Dilemma

That is why I want to do the stage 3 build on my trans so it can handle up to 600lb-ft of torque. I need to rebuild the trans anyway and planned on that build no matter which engine I use. Ive seen 700r4 survive behind big blocks in short bed trucks for well over 100,000 miles so a properly built 4L60E will live behind the 6.0L. I don't know if I want more than 400hp anyway its the torque I am after. Besides I personally know that biggest downfall to a 700r4 and a 4L60E is the weight of the vehicle in respect to the torque output. A stock 4L60E max gvwr is less than 6000lbs a properly built one can handle more than 10,000lb. in respect a Stock 4L80E is only good for 8000lbs and to build one that can handle more than 10,000lb will cost me twice as much as the 4L60 and since I do not plan on towing much at all or weighing my Tahoe down more than its current capacity the 4L60E I build will suffice.
biggsteve97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2011, 05:08 PM   #6
66redw/white
made in america
 
66redw/white's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: baton rouge la
Posts: 653
Re: 5.3L or LQ4 6.0L Dilemma

the ss silverados came with 6.0s and 4l60e. all that stuff that you have on your 5.3 will fit right onto the 6.0. you might build it up just alittle bit before you put it in. or.... you could just give it to me!
__________________
2005 gmc sierra- 4/6, t56, cammed 5.3. 4.10, big bars, and brakes.
sounds good

1964 c10-283 powerpack, 3 on the tree

2004 corvette- lowered, borla, tuned. slow

my old girl
1966 c10- 305v8, t-5 sold
66redw/white is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2011, 05:20 PM   #7
biggsteve97
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 284
Re: 5.3L or LQ4 6.0L Dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by 66redw/white View Post
the ss silverados came with 6.0s and 4l60e. all that stuff that you have on your 5.3 will fit right onto the 6.0. you might build it up just alittle bit before you put it in. or.... you could just give it to me!
Oh I definitely plan to use all the mods i currently have i just havent been able decide if its worth doing the swap, yet. If it was the LQ9 345hp 6.0 i wouldnt even hesitate to do the swap. I was thinkin about upgrading the cam to the 325hp version or if the cam is compatible with the heads using the 345hp cam.
biggsteve97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2011, 05:38 PM   #8
66redw/white
made in america
 
66redw/white's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: baton rouge la
Posts: 653
Re: 5.3L or LQ4 6.0L Dilemma

call up comp cams and get a custom grind done for it. they are the same price as the off the shelf grinds if i remember right. that way itll be made just for your truck and that low end torque you want
__________________
2005 gmc sierra- 4/6, t56, cammed 5.3. 4.10, big bars, and brakes.
sounds good

1964 c10-283 powerpack, 3 on the tree

2004 corvette- lowered, borla, tuned. slow

my old girl
1966 c10- 305v8, t-5 sold
66redw/white is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2011, 07:58 PM   #9
biggsteve97
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 284
Re: 5.3L or LQ4 6.0L Dilemma

well i just got a gm #12561721 325/345hp cam new for $60 tonight. I know it will be a good upgrade for the 5.3L but at this point im starting to think id be better off to swap in the 6.0L if not just for the better torque or just because ive got the motor and nothing else to put it into yet. Thanks for the info! any other info is gladly appreciated.
biggsteve97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2011, 08:21 PM   #10
Benelli
Watchin the rust grow
 
Benelli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Western Nebraska
Posts: 950
Re: 5.3L or LQ4 6.0L Dilemma

Hell drop it in! I didn't realize it was that simple of a swap.
__________________
1979 Chevy K10 (H/D Front end) - 350 w/ Holley Truck Avenger, Weinald Intake manifold, headers, bored .060 over, mild cam, Built up TH350 (TranStar Shift kit) with a part-timed NP203 t-case SOLD ($3,000)
1997 Chevy Silverado 1500 - 4.3 vortec, extended cab, 21 highway MPG, stock. "Red" SOLD ($3,000)
1987 Toyota 4wd Pick-up - work in progress, future DD SOLD ($1,850)
1998 Dodge Ram 2500 Cummins 5spd Quad cab - old 12 valve with some work done
2004 Chevy Silverado - Black, 4x4, 5.3L, stock for now

Underneath that rust is a heart of gold
Benelli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-03-2011, 09:36 PM   #11
biggsteve97
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 284
Re: 5.3L or LQ4 6.0L Dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by Benelli View Post
Hell drop it in! I didn't realize it was that simple of a swap.
ya, the 4.8/5.3/6.0 all have the same block and there are really only minor internal differences between them. so same motor mounts, same intake, wiring so on so forth. though i am finding out the the 99-00 6.0 has a longer crank and a different flex-plate so i might run into a problem there. we will see.

Last edited by biggsteve97; 05-03-2011 at 09:37 PM.
biggsteve97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 11:16 AM   #12
usmcchevy
Has more rust than truck...
 
usmcchevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ivanhoe, MN
Posts: 2,421
Re: 5.3L or LQ4 6.0L Dilemma

A 4l60e will handle a 6.0.............but not for long in a high performance application. A built 4l60e to me just seems to be postponing the inevitable when you are over 500hp. Under 500 when built correctly they hold up pretty well.

99-00 LQ4's did have the cast heads and the crans spacer built into the crank flange. Being the spacer is built in, the trans can only be bolted up to a 4l80e or a older trans(TH350, TH400....). This makes that motor a better canidate for someone doing a LS swap than to replace a 5.3. Or it just means you need to do a 4l80e swap while you're at it
__________________
1972 Custom/10 SWB, 4.8/4l80e
Build thread

LSx Swap FAQ index
usmcchevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 11:45 AM   #13
66redw/white
made in america
 
66redw/white's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: baton rouge la
Posts: 653
Re: 5.3L or LQ4 6.0L Dilemma

i think they make an offset flexplate for those motors so that they can be bolted to a 4l60. ill look for it.
__________________
2005 gmc sierra- 4/6, t56, cammed 5.3. 4.10, big bars, and brakes.
sounds good

1964 c10-283 powerpack, 3 on the tree

2004 corvette- lowered, borla, tuned. slow

my old girl
1966 c10- 305v8, t-5 sold
66redw/white is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 12:01 PM   #14
66redw/white
made in america
 
66redw/white's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: baton rouge la
Posts: 653
Re: 5.3L or LQ4 6.0L Dilemma

i found this over on ls1 tech

"I have the configuration this post talks about, I installed a 1999 to 2000 LQ4 6.0 Liter into my 2004 chevy Tahoe, and yes i ran into the same problem because the crank is longer, However, after spending over 3200.00 at AAMCO, I found the fix, There is a shop in Huntington beach, CA. that fixed everything up for me, This shop builds its own torque converters and does custom racing transmissions as well, "California Performance Transmission"
http://www.cpttransmission.com/
The owners name is Art Carr and this guy knows ALL.

They built my new torque converter and installed it in a day, I asked Art to save the spec's because i ran acrossed your post before i found the fix, so i thought i would share this info with you incase you still needed it.

The new torque converter cost me about 375.00 + Tax, so if you still need this fix call Art and he will fix you up."

aparently in 01 they changed to a spacer instead of a long crank. so 01 and up just take the spacer off and chage the flexplate, 01 and down call that dude^
__________________
2005 gmc sierra- 4/6, t56, cammed 5.3. 4.10, big bars, and brakes.
sounds good

1964 c10-283 powerpack, 3 on the tree

2004 corvette- lowered, borla, tuned. slow

my old girl
1966 c10- 305v8, t-5 sold
66redw/white is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 12:08 PM   #15
usmcchevy
Has more rust than truck...
 
usmcchevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ivanhoe, MN
Posts: 2,421
Re: 5.3L or LQ4 6.0L Dilemma

Quote:
Originally Posted by 66redw/white View Post
i found this over on ls1 tech

"I have the configuration this post talks about, I installed a 1999 to 2000 LQ4 6.0 Liter into my 2004 chevy Tahoe, and yes i ran into the same problem because the crank is longer, However, after spending over 3200.00 at AAMCO, I found the fix, There is a shop in Huntington beach, CA. that fixed everything up for me, This shop builds its own torque converters and does custom racing transmissions as well, "California Performance Transmission"
http://www.cpttransmission.com/
The owners name is Art Carr and this guy knows ALL.

They built my new torque converter and installed it in a day, I asked Art to save the spec's because i ran acrossed your post before i found the fix, so i thought i would share this info with you incase you still needed it.

The new torque converter cost me about 375.00 + Tax, so if you still need this fix call Art and he will fix you up."

aparently in 01 they changed to a spacer instead of a long crank. so 01 and up just take the spacer off and chage the flexplate, 01 and down call that dude^

Never seen that before, Cool.
__________________
1972 Custom/10 SWB, 4.8/4l80e
Build thread

LSx Swap FAQ index
usmcchevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2011, 01:38 PM   #16
biggsteve97
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Kansas City, Mo
Posts: 284
Re: 5.3L or LQ4 6.0L Dilemma

cool, thanks!! I had even thought about just using the heads from the 6.0 and just boring out the 5.3 and using stock 6.0 flat top pistons if i couldn't find a way around the crank issue. ill check into the offset flex plate and the custom torque converter and I might even talk to PATC and see if they have something since they specialize in these trans.
biggsteve97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com