Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
06-08-2011, 03:40 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: WNC
Posts: 226
|
Slam Specialties RE vs SS bags?
I want to bag the rear of my `63 C-10. When I bought the truck it had a nice stance but it had been done by torch heating the coils and the ride sucked. I rebuilt the front end with drop spindles and new coils.
For the rear I'm looking to use the 7" bags. I don't want to lay frame or hop the truck. It's a driver and I carry reasonable loads and tow sometimes. The plan is a simple system with air lines running to a convenient location with schrader valves for airing up. I've read criticisms of the new SS series but they're a good year old and wondered if it was early production bugs that got worked out or what. |
06-08-2011, 04:17 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 3,728
|
Re: Slam Specialties RE vs SS bags?
I had RE bags on my '69 and will be running SS bags on my 66. I haven't heard anything bad about them and a lot of guys on the suspension forum are running either the SS bags, or Dominators.
__________________
New Project: 1966 LWB C20 Plans: 1/2 ton conversion Dropmember front Dropmember rear Corvette discs Restored raised bed http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=4295210 |
06-08-2011, 07:29 PM | #3 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: High Plains of Colorado
Posts: 2,485
|
Re: Slam Specialties RE vs SS bags?
Can't help with your question, but felt compelled to say, Nice Truck. The body side stripe looks good. Kind of surprising, I wouldn't have thought it would look good but it does.
Last edited by lakeroadster; 06-08-2011 at 07:30 PM. |
06-08-2011, 11:42 PM | #4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: WNC
Posts: 226
|
Re: Slam Specialties RE vs SS bags?
Quote:
This was my intro yesterday: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=468542 |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|