Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
06-13-2011, 08:54 AM | #1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Franklinton NC
Posts: 1,309
|
GM 4.2 has anyone done it?
As the title says,has anyone put a new GM4.2 in their truck?Seems like it would be a great canidate for a turbo build.
|
06-13-2011, 09:42 AM | #2 |
Simple? What's simple?
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Southeast CT
Posts: 1,472
|
Re: GM 4.2 has anyone done it?
Turbo has been done in the Colorado/Canyon platform, I think there is a whole kit for it available
That said, haven't seen one in a truck but I've thought about it - they're a phenomenal motor.
__________________
CURRENT '50 GMC 100 shortbed Gen IV 4.8 LS - 4L65E (Secret truck, Shhh!!!) Build '63 Buick Wildcat Coupe 401ci Nailhead (Very much in pieces) Photos '66 Impala SS convertible 327-QJet-glide (4 speed swap one of these days...) Photos '69 CST/10 4x4 SWB Stepper 350 2bbl - NV4500/NP241C (Broken Truck!) '72 Sierra Grande 2WD LWB fleetside 350-TH350 Refresh '99 K2500 Silverado RCLB 5.7 Vortec - NV4500/NP241C (Daily) '99 K2500 Suburban 7.4 Vortec - NV4500/NP246 (still working out the bugs) SOLD '71 Custom/10 2WD LWB fleetside - '72 GMC K/3500 Dually (Sold to redryder) |
06-13-2011, 09:49 AM | #3 |
laying low
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Searcy, Ark. USA
Posts: 13,514
|
Re: GM 4.2 has anyone done it?
Didn't GM build a straight 5 cylinder and put it in the trailblazer some years back? Or is this the 4.2?
__________________
Boog 69 Chevy stepside, 358/T350, 4.11 posi, 4.5/4 drop, rallys, poboy driver primer is finer 91 Chevy sportside, Tahoe, Yukon & GMC Crewcab All GM..'nuff said. I stand for the flag and kneel at the cross |
06-13-2011, 10:08 AM | #4 |
Has more rust than truck...
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Ivanhoe, MN
Posts: 2,421
|
Re: GM 4.2 has anyone done it?
4.2 is the 6 cylinder
3.5/3.7 is the 5 cylinder I think what holds people back from doing the 4.2 swap is the fact that they can get and install a 4.8 or 5.3 for about the same money. |
06-13-2011, 10:04 AM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Franklinton NC
Posts: 1,309
|
Re: GM 4.2 has anyone done it?
I think the 4.2 is a 5cyl.
|
06-13-2011, 10:12 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Largo Florida
Posts: 632
|
Re: GM 4.2 has anyone done it?
The electronics on the 3.5/3.7/4.2 inlines is ALOT more complicated compared to the LS series of engines.
__________________
Lifes journey is not to arrive at the gate well preserved, it is to slide in sideways all used up and wore out yelling.....God what'a ride! Where patience fails, force prevails Stapp's Ironical Paradox "The universal aptitude for ineptitude makes any human accomplishment an incredible miracle." |
06-13-2011, 11:56 AM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Marianna Arkansas
Posts: 7,280
|
Re: GM 4.2 has anyone done it?
Turbo's have been done. I think one guy did one in a 66 chevy two. The eletronics are a lot more coplacated also as said above the atlas platform is what the General calls them the 2.8 4- 3.5 3.7-5 and the 4.2-6 . Are good motors all but not without their problems. The wiring would probably double the cost of a ls buiuld and them there is the oil pan. on some models [4x4] the front differentail goes thru the oil pan. I'm sure custom pans could be had from someone but there again is more cost. Jim
|
06-13-2011, 12:55 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Valley Center KS
Posts: 3,524
|
Re: GM 4.2 has anyone done it?
I have thought of building a Nova with a 4.2L in it (turboed eventually too) but haven't gotten there.
I was doing some looking into it, and the 4.2L really don't get any better gas mileage than the 5.3L (in a trailblazer) so I was kinda disappointed about that. I thought it my be a more "economical" engine. However, I think it would definatly add to the uniqueness factor. Especially if it was in an original 6 cylinder car/truck. It will be many years until I get around to building a nova though. My next build is going to be a 6 cylinder though....but a 5.9L cummins in a suburban |
Bookmarks |
|
|