![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: huntington beach
Posts: 845
|
Rear Mounts: stock or urethane?
I'm using the standard bell housing that mounts on the crossmember. Are there any advantages to the polyurethane mounts over the rubber?
thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lawrenceville, Ga
Posts: 2,641
|
Re: Rear Mounts: stock or urethane?
I used stock rubber mounts on my truck. I think you would get a little more vibration and noise from the urethane.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auburn ca.
Posts: 2,886
|
Re: Rear Mounts: stock or urethane?
polyurethane is much stiffer than rubber. Like Russell said you may get more vibration.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toppenish, WA
Posts: 15,409
|
Re: Rear Mounts: stock or urethane?
I'd think that you would want all of the mounts to match front and rear. I've never used the urethane ones so I can't say if they transfer noise and or vibration more than the rubber ones would.
__________________
Founding member of the too many projects, too little time and money club. My ongoing truck projects: 48 Chev 3100 that will run a 292 Six. 71 GMC 2500 that is getting a Cad 500 transplant. 77 C 30 dualie, 454, 4 speed with a 10 foot flatbed and hoist. It does the heavy work and hauls the projects around. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|