The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-12-2013, 07:41 PM   #1
Hotrod1979
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Utrecht
Posts: 24
64 C10 longbed two or one piece axle with 383 stroker engine

HI

I have a 64 c10 longbed with a strong 383 stroker engine and th700r4 tranny.
My original drive shaft set up is a two piece drive shaft with upper mount bearing. Now that I put in the th700 transmission my front drive shaft is to long.

I have read a lot about one versus two piece drive shafts but I am still not sure what the best option will be.
My upper mount center bearing is the weaker one and I have the thinner front drive shaft. My truck is lowered 4" in the back. Will a one piece axle work without interfering with the crossmember or should I stay with my two oiece acle and just shorten the front piece.
I am a little worried about it because I have not got the heavy duty lower mounted support bearing and thicker front shaft.

Any advice from you guys? Thanks a lot

I live in the Netherlands so getting parts such as a bracket for a lower mount center bearing is very difficult....
Hotrod1979 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2013, 09:22 PM   #2
66 C10 383
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Somewhere In So. IL.
Posts: 412
Re: 64 C10 longbed two or one piece axle with 383 stroker engine

Though I don't have an answer for you, I'm in kinda the same situation. I'm currently building a 66 C10 LWB and will be running a stout 383 with a T56 6 speed tranny.

In my research I've been told that the 2 piece driveshaft is actually stronger than a long single driveshaft due to the length. I guess it's the torsional twisting of the longer one that is the concern.

As far as the bearing support, I'm interested to see some replies too.
66 C10 383 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 04:24 PM   #3
Hotrod1979
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Utrecht
Posts: 24
Re: 64 C10 longbed two or one piece axle with 383 stroker engine

Does anybody know what the maximum outside diameter can be for a one piece driveshaft on a longbed 64 c10 and still have enough clearance with the crossmember? And what is the maximum amount you can lower a truck with a one piece axle?
Hotrod1979 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 05:26 PM   #4
creep
Registered Loser
 
creep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Elyria, OH
Posts: 1,523
Re: 64 C10 longbed two or one piece axle with 383 stroker engine

I don't have any problems with my 2 piece driveshaft and 383 stroker (405hp). My carrier bearing mounts on the bottom though.
__________________
((..))
((0))

'63 GMC lwb, 383, th350, lays frame, genuine patina.
The Build Thread - http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=374267
'88 Astro cargo bagged, shaved, phantom grille. *SOLD*
'50 Chevy 2 door sedan awaiting attention.
2014 Silverado Ext cab, 5.3, daily driver.
creep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 05:42 PM   #5
Hotrod1979
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Utrecht
Posts: 24
Re: 64 C10 longbed two or one piece axle with 383 stroker engine

Problem is that my slip yoke has far too much play. And finding a replacement drive shaft here in the Netherlands is very difficult. That is why I was thinking about replacing the whole shaft for a one piece.

The overall length of my drive shaft would be 66". A 3.5" od driveshaft can have a maximum length of 65".

The question is what the maximum outside diameter is a 64 longbed can have to still clear the crossmember..
Hotrod1979 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 08:23 PM   #6
TJ's Chevy
Registered User
 
TJ's Chevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Southern Oregon
Posts: 10,384
Re: 64 C10 longbed two or one piece axle with 383 stroker engine

Have you looked online for some places to build you a custom drive shaft?
__________________
1966 Chevy C10 "Project Two Tone" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=596643
1964 GMC "Crustine" semi-build:http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=665056
My youtube channel. Username "Military Chevy": https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC_h...fzpcUXyK_5-uiw
TJ's Chevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 03:19 AM   #7
Hotrod1979
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Utrecht
Posts: 24
Re: 64 C10 longbed two or one piece axle with 383 stroker engine

No I went to my local shop. Building a one off with new slip yoke will get far to expensive. Around 750 euro, that is about 900$.
Posted via Mobile Device
Hotrod1979 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2013, 04:31 PM   #8
Hotrod1979
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Utrecht
Posts: 24
Re: 64 C10 longbed two or one piece axle with 383 stroker engine

today I measured what clearance I would have between a 3.5" thick one piece driveshaft and my crossmember. Because the yoke on the diff is not centered the clearance between de driveshaft and crossmember on the right side is only 5/16" That's can not be enough....
Hotrod1979 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2013, 01:16 AM   #9
luvbowties
Registered User
 
luvbowties's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: southeasternfoothillsofusa
Posts: 1,557
Question Re: 64 C10 longbed two or one piece axle with 383 stroker engine

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hotrod1979 View Post
today I measured what clearance I would have between a 3.5" thick one piece driveshaft and my crossmember. Because the yoke on the diff is not centered the clearance between de driveshaft and crossmember on the right side is only 5/16" That's can not be enough....
Almost sure I recall someone enlarging that opening and re-inforcing the x-member. Maybe Google will help.
Why can't you just shorten the tranny-end of your 2-piece shaft & use the bearing & slip-joint as is?
Sam
luvbowties is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2013, 02:38 AM   #10
Hotrod1979
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Utrecht
Posts: 24
Re: 64 C10 longbed two or one piece axle with 383 stroker engine

My slip yoke has far too much play to allow the shafts to be balanced out correctly..
Posted via Mobile Device
Hotrod1979 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2013, 12:35 AM   #11
Captainfab
60-66 Nut

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Posts: 23,252
Re: 64 C10 longbed two or one piece axle with 383 stroker engine

I would stay with a 2 piece driveshaft in a long bed. Do you have wrecking yards that would have some GM trucks from in the 70's and 80's? You should be able to find a driveshaft(s) from one of those that can be made to work. You can typically have a driveshaft shortened much cheaper than having one lengthened, or a complete new one built. And while at it I would upgrade to the HD center support bearing.

I believe I have some fairly good stock HD driveshafts, but I imagine shipping to The Netherlands would be expensive.
__________________
Power Steering Box Adapter Plates For Sale HERE
Power Brake Booster Adapter Brackets For Sale '63-'66 HERE and '67-'72 HERE and '60-'62 HERE and "60-'62 with clutch HERE
Rear Disc Brake Brackets For Sale. Impala SS calipers HERE Camaro Calipers HERE D52 Calipers HERE 6 Lug HERE
Hydroboost Mounting Plates HERE
Captainfab is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com