The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-13-2013, 02:44 AM   #1
BrookelynnGreen
Registered User
 
BrookelynnGreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Albany, New York
Posts: 125
Ridler 695 backspace

Front 20x8.5
Rear 20x10

What backspace is needed for an 86 SWB?
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
-Samuel
"Knowledge Is Power"
BrookelynnGreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 10:13 PM   #2
wraprail
Registered User
 
wraprail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Havasu City Arizona
Posts: 863
Re: Ridler 695 backspace

Whatever the backspace is on these wheels its right. I have a set in the sizes you posted and the fit is ideal.

85 C10 swb slammed
__________________
wraprail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2013, 10:33 PM   #3
mgchevyparts
Registered User
 
mgchevyparts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Upland, Calif
Posts: 698
Re: Ridler 695 backspace

The 20x8.5 come with 4.75" backspace, the 20x10 come with 5.5" backspace, sounds about perfect.
mgchevyparts is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 01:03 AM   #4
JCampbell
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hesperia, Ca
Posts: 1,332
Re: Ridler 695 backspace

Man, so much contradictory info regarding backspace. I'm looking to pull the trigger on a set this week in the same sizes. Backspacing has got me wringing my hands. I keep hearing 5"-5.75" BS on an 8.5 is ideal.
JCampbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 04:41 AM   #5
wraprail
Registered User
 
wraprail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Havasu City Arizona
Posts: 863
Re: Ridler 695 backspace

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=500866

Post #27

zero offset
In this case mgchevy is correct.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v7...1/untitled.jpg
__________________

Last edited by wraprail; 06-20-2013 at 05:20 AM.
wraprail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 05:29 AM   #6
lolife99
67-72 parts collector,…
 
lolife99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,692
Re: Ridler 695 backspace

Backspacing equal how you want it to look.
Personal opion is what drives these numbers.
(Thats why I hate giving out numbers about backspacing)

Myself,... I hate the front track width being wider than the rear,... or the wheels being closer to the fenders on the front than the rear.

My opinion (for me),... I want more backspacing than a 4.75" BS on a 8.5" wheel up front on a 67-87 truck with a stock crossmember and stock width a-arms.
There are a ton of varibles when talking BS numbers.

But it all boils down to personal preference.
__________________
Keith

Convert to disc brakes.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823
lolife99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 05:33 AM   #7
lolife99
67-72 parts collector,…
 
lolife99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,692
Re: Ridler 695 backspace

Good thread here:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=333775
Attached Images
 
__________________
Keith

Convert to disc brakes.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823
lolife99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 05:43 AM   #8
wraprail
Registered User
 
wraprail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Havasu City Arizona
Posts: 863
Re: Ridler 695 backspace

When I see one of these trucks with a narrowed crossmember or +offset wheels, to me it just looks silly with the front wheels sucked in and 2" fender clearance. Never did see the point in that but just my opinion.
I do agree about the rear.
I would move the rear out over moving the front in.
In my case, on my truck, I will be adding a 1" spacer on the rear.

Edit:
I must confess,
I do not have front inner fenders.
At my lowered ride height the tires rub making a sharp turn with 4.75" bs. (must raise 4 u turn)
The fenders are designed (patent pending) to rub while not cut the tire.
__________________

Last edited by wraprail; 06-20-2013 at 06:03 AM.
wraprail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 11:16 AM   #9
JCampbell
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Hesperia, Ca
Posts: 1,332
Re: Ridler 695 backspace

Okay. Got it.

I see what you’re saying, too, Keith. I don’t want them sticking out past the edge of the fenders, but I don’t particularly care for them being “sucked in” too far inboard.
JCampbell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-20-2013, 11:25 AM   #10
lolife99
67-72 parts collector,…
 
lolife99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,692
Re: Ridler 695 backspace

4.75" bs vs 5 25" bs is only 1/2" difference.
But I don't like depending on my suspension to keep the fenders off the tires.
I like having my wheels placed correctly so if I hit and unexpected hard bump I have room for the suspension to compress.
This means allowing for the curves of the fenders or bedsides.
Even more critical on bagged trucks or super low static dropped trucks.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
Keith

Convert to disc brakes.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823
lolife99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com