The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-06-2014, 04:34 PM   #1
4x4K10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: New York
Posts: 24
Sm465

If i were to go to my local junkyard and find a truck with an sm465 what would i need along with the transmission in order to swap my auto to manual? i know hydraulic clutch is better but i would also be willing to use the mechanical setup. These transmissions arent very easy to find around here. Thanks!
4x4K10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2014, 09:10 PM   #2
silverbear
Registered User
 
silverbear's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Glen St. Mary, Florida
Posts: 304
Re: Sm465

What year is the truck you want to put the SM465 in? Does it have the low hump or high hump floor?

The first things I want to mention are some small parts but it makes the swap go better.
1. Hydraulic clutch setup: make sure you get the reservoir and the bracket it mounts to.
2. the wiring for the backup sensor. It goes from the trans, through the fire wall and plugs in under the dash. Get all of that.

Bigger items.
3. Everything from the flex plate to the trans/transfer case mount.
4. Pedal assembly. The clutch release switch should be parts of this assembly.

There may be some other items you may need that I can't think right now. Make sure to take a buddy with you to move this trans around because it is not light.
__________________
86 Chevrolet K10 350/SM465 Frankie SOLD
1995 GMC Yukon GT SOLD
1996 GMC Yukon GT
2010 Suburban 1500 4x4 5.3l/6L80e. Sold
2016 Silverado 2500HD Crew Cab 4x4 6.0l/6L80e
silverbear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2014, 09:40 PM   #3
tucsonjwt
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,189
Re: Sm465

I can't answer your question, but just a thought. Are you very familiar with the SM465? They don't call it a granny 4 speed for nothin.

They are a very old school manual transmission. The one in my C20 has a sloppy shifter, which is normal (so I am told), but can be irritating to the fussy driver. It is nothing like a modern 4 or 5 speed. First gear is never used, and it winds up to 4th gear very soon after takeoff (about 35 mph with my 454/ 4:10 rear axle.) So, you really have a 3 speed transmission.

You do need the big floor hump, but some have hacked a hole out and installed a patch cover.

On the plus side, rebuilt SM465s can be had for about $650 from a reputable shop. The core value is about $250.

I like my old SM465, but I don't drive it very much. If it was in a daily driver I think I would prefer a modern 5 speed. My 83 still has a mechanical clutch, and I hasn't given my any trouble, aside from just being old and worn out some.

Just sayin' - you won't win any drag races with a granny.
tucsonjwt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2014, 09:21 AM   #4
tgh117
Crazy
 
tgh117's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Emmaus, Pa
Posts: 203
Re: Sm465

Yea as was said above. Its not meant for a fast truck for any reason. Mine actually isn't too bad, but I am running 35's and 3.73's. It still won't win any races.

Anyway you need the flywheel, clutch setup, trans, possibly the transfercase as well depending on what is in your truck now, and you will need the crossmember, the pedal assembly from in the cab, the linkage setup that bolts to the frame to connect the pedal to the throw out bearing, and the taller hump from the cab to run something like that for sure.

You will also likely have to at least your rear drive shaft assembly redone. Front might have enough length.

My buddy went from a TH350 to SM465 and I think he only had to have the rear drive shaft redone, but I can't full recall.

Its a pretty big job, and that trans definitely has some weight to it. Good luck.
__________________
77 SB Stepside in a bunch of pieces scattered around the garage.
tgh117 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2014, 11:56 AM   #5
Jeepwm69
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 687
Re: Sm465

Very heavy duty transmission, but good points listed above.

At the risk of sounding like a wuss, our non-hydralic clutch equipped 83 will flat wear out your left leg if you drive it in traffic. It's not a problem where I live, but on one of the few trips it's made to the city, constant shifting with the 40 lb spring that apparently is on the clutch wore my leg out
Jeepwm69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2014, 01:37 PM   #6
MalibuSSwagon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Weare,NH
Posts: 1,592
Re: Sm465

In comparison, my 86 with the hydro clutch is very easy to shift, the pedal is effortless. I would certainly recommend the hydro clutch conversion.
MalibuSSwagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2014, 02:03 PM   #7
68Timber
I know the pieces fit
 
68Timber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MONTGOMERY, AL
Posts: 5,523
Re: Sm465

Depending on how anal you are, you might want to swap to a manual trans steering column.
__________________
John

79 2wd Blazer (Bruiser)
85 M1009 Blazer (Sarge) build
74 Honda Z50 build
68Timber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-07-2014, 05:13 PM   #8
tucsonjwt
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,189
Re: Sm465

On the other hand, my left leg is the only part of my body that gets a work out these days. At least that is some kind of workout. I guess my spring must be worn out, because it doesn't feel too stiff to me. I like simple things.
tucsonjwt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2014, 11:45 AM   #9
Tucson38
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Tucson Arizona
Posts: 164
Re: Sm465

The SM 465 seems pretty indestructible but it has some drawbacks, one of them being a large gap in the gear ratios. In a perfect world this tranny would still have the super low first gear but another gear between 3rd and 4th, plus an overdrive gear but still have it's rugged quality. But I guess that's way too much to ask.
Tucson38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 10:29 AM   #10
68Timber
I know the pieces fit
 
68Timber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MONTGOMERY, AL
Posts: 5,523
Re: Sm465

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tucson38 View Post
The SM 465 seems pretty indestructible but it has some drawbacks, one of them being a large gap in the gear ratios. In a perfect world this tranny would still have the super low first gear but another gear between 3rd and 4th, plus an overdrive gear but still have it's rugged quality. But I guess that's way too much to ask.
That would be the NV4500.
__________________
John

79 2wd Blazer (Bruiser)
85 M1009 Blazer (Sarge) build
74 Honda Z50 build
68Timber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2014, 02:29 PM   #11
Edahall
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Goliad, TX
Posts: 672
Re: Sm465

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tucson38 View Post
The SM 465 seems pretty indestructible but it has some drawbacks, one of them being a large gap in the gear ratios. In a perfect world this tranny would still have the super low first gear but another gear between 3rd and 4th, plus an overdrive gear but still have it's rugged quality. But I guess that's way too much to ask.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BRUISER View Post
That would be the NV4500.
The NV4500 has the same large gap between each gear as the SM465 but has the addition of an overdrive. Speaking of less gap, the NV5600 6 speed transmission is the one you may be thinking. It is also a lot more robust transmission than the NV4500 and shifted better. The NV4500 had issues with the 5th gear nut backing out.
__________________
1990 ¾ ton 4x4 Chevy Suburban
-Cummins Diesel - 12 valve - factory rebuilt
-6 speed bullet proof manual transmission - NV5600
-Gear Vendors Overdrive - HX35 Holset Turbo
-NP205 iron transfer case
-3.73 gears -2" Lift
Edahall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2014, 07:08 PM   #12
TwoFiftyShifter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Gwinnett GA
Posts: 1,803
Re: Sm465

I have had 3 of em. Half tons, clutch is bare able. I had a 3/4 ton with a hydro clutch and it was a butch in traffic.

This trans is sturdy, but old. Slow shifting with big gap between 2-3. I love it, however.
__________________
1982 K10 SWB
1987 V20 - Sold - Doh!
TwoFiftyShifter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2014, 11:48 PM   #13
Shyguy
Junior Member
 
Shyguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Southeast Missouri
Posts: 2,436
Re: Sm465

I use to have a '72 GMC 3/4 ton with a SM-465 and I used the low gear when I was launching a 26 ft cabin cruiser and pulling it out of the water. My present truck is a '67 C-10 with a 454 and a SM-465, I use the low gear working around our farm.
__________________
'67 Chevy C-20 short stepper - build complete, 454/SM-465.
'75 C-30 Single Cab DRW-350 small block/NP-435.
'77 GMC-6500 Dump Truck, 427 Tall Deck.
'92 GMC K-3500 Duallie, 454/4L80E.
Shyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 02:26 AM   #14
cory d
Registered User
 
cory d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Arlington WA
Posts: 1,728
Re: Sm465

old pile of crap, useless off the trails/farm, giant gaps in the gears. whines really loud. have one in my truck. i love it!
cory d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 06:16 AM   #15
tucsonjwt
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,189
Re: Sm465

I bought my 83 12 years ago and it came with a gear vendor under/overdrive from the previous owner who used the truck to haul a truck camper. Still, the GV only is used when shifting into third gear and fourth gear, so I really don't use it in the city - stop and go traffic means it would not be in GV mode very long. The cost of installing/maintaining a gear vendor overdrive makes it impractical to put behind a SM465.
tucsonjwt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 09:29 AM   #16
MalibuSSwagon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Weare,NH
Posts: 1,592
Re: Sm465

Yes I almost forgot, the noise. It's loud and the tin can cab only makes that more apparent.
MalibuSSwagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 12:19 PM   #17
cory d
Registered User
 
cory d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Arlington WA
Posts: 1,728
Re: Sm465

nv4500 would be sweet. my buddy might put a nv3500 behind a 292
cory d is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com