The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-04-2014, 11:44 PM   #1
mjrwraith
Registered User
 
mjrwraith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Amarillo, Tx
Posts: 6
Mild 350 sbc build, what do you think?

Ok so I have just acquired a 1972 GMC C15 long bed fleetside. I want to do just a simple restore job with a focus more on comfort than a fancy paint job or hot rod motor. I do however want to add a little extra power and a few more mpg out of it. So after some research I wanted to throw my idea on how to set this up out there and get some of your opinions. So here it is, I'm going to take the stock motor with all the lower end being factory spec, and put a COMPCams 252he cam with the new valve train and all to match. Then take the stock intake manifold off and put on an edelbrock rpm intake with the stock quadrajet. Leave the stock exhaust manifolds on and put a b&m shift kit in the TH350 tranny. I'm only looking to get around 25 more horse and maybe 2-3 mpg more out of it. Compression will be stock, which I believe is 9.5:1 may be wrong I'll have to double check. I think that covers everything so any tips or advice would be helpful thanks.
mjrwraith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2014, 01:36 AM   #2
DonnieB
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 51
Re: Mild 350 sbc build, what do you think?

I would consider exhaust too.
__________________
'70 2wd swb, 406 sbc, air ride and a big smile on my face!
DonnieB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2014, 02:44 AM   #3
adricar1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: United kingdom
Posts: 127
Re: Mild 350 sbc build, what do you think?

personally with that cam i would go with a performer manifold over the rpm, as that cam will not the rpm up top.Exhaust would as mentioned be a consideration as well. have you looked at there 260 cams ? pull well and a little more rpm.
__________________
GMC K1500 1971 350 cu in th350 4wd
Bondo Bob c 10 1971 stepside th 350
c10 1970 350 cu in manual air con stepside.
adricar1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2014, 07:26 AM   #4
mjrwraith
Registered User
 
mjrwraith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Amarillo, Tx
Posts: 6
Re: Mild 350 sbc build, what do you think?

Yeah I am looking at exhaust just forgot to to add it to the list. I'm looking at going with true dials. After looking back over my parts list and the edelbrock site I'm definitely going with the performer. I had one on one of my old grandwagoneers and loved it. I want the rpm range of the 252 I compared the two and the 252 is in the rpm range I'm wanting.
mjrwraith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2014, 08:20 AM   #5
hugger6933
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Marianna Arkansas
Posts: 7,263
Re: Mild 350 sbc build, what do you think?

I would consider the 260h. I have used the 268H in many cases and it has never let me down. Even going with one that far from the stock spec it helped the motor run so much better in all cases it got better gas mileage. and power boy howdy!!the expectations you have are fine if not just a little low but being low is ok so your not disappointed if it doesn't do great, but it will. Jim
hugger6933 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2014, 08:32 AM   #6
mjrwraith
Registered User
 
mjrwraith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Amarillo, Tx
Posts: 6
Re: Mild 350 sbc build, what do you think?

Quote:
Originally Posted by hugger6933 View Post
I would consider the 260h. I have used the 268H in many cases and it has never let me down. Even going with one that far from the stock spec it helped the motor run so much better in all cases it got better gas mileage. and power boy howdy!!the expectations you have are fine if not just a little low but being low is ok so your not disappointed if it doesn't do great, but it will. Jim
My reasoning for the low duration and all is along the fact of the last motor I built, which was an AMC 360 in a Grand Wagoneer, I put the 270H cam in it and it was too much. The motor got horrible mileage I had to put a 750 CFM carb on it just to keep the poor thing from falling on its face.
mjrwraith is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2014, 05:51 AM   #7
mechanicalman
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Glendale, Arizna
Posts: 1,642
Re: Mild 350 sbc build, what do you think?

Quote:
Originally Posted by mjrwraith View Post
Ok so I have just acquired a 1972 GMC C15 long bed fleetside. I want to do just a simple restore job with a focus more on comfort than a fancy paint job or hot rod motor. I do however want to add a little extra power and a few more mpg out of it. So after some research I wanted to throw my idea on how to set this up out there and get some of your opinions. So here it is, I'm going to take the stock motor with all the lower end being factory spec, and put a COMPCams 252he cam with the new valve train and all to match. Then take the stock intake manifold off and put on an edelbrock rpm intake with the stock quadrajet. Leave the stock exhaust manifolds on and put a b&m shift kit in the TH350 tranny. I'm only looking to get around 25 more horse and maybe 2-3 mpg more out of it. Compression will be stock, which I believe is 9.5:1 may be wrong I'll have to double check. I think that covers everything so any tips or advice would be helpful thanks.
Stock compression ratio that year stock was advertised at 8.5 but if you checked the head chamber size and with the stock head gasket it was closer to 8.0 than 8.5.

Regardless of head use the fel pro steel shim 1904 gaskets to enable quench in the combustion chambers.

Those dish piston engines with that size cam just love smaller combustion chambers like the double humps.

For $399.00 you can get these rebuilt 65cc heads, they are likely rebuild 305 castings they have new bronze wall valve guides, stainless valves 1.94"/1.5" valves with new springs that will more than handle your cam.
http://www.aeroheadracing.com/chevy.html

Do you have dual exhaust? I think that engine would like dual exhaust with a crossover pipe. Stock single Y pipe is very restrictive with bad reversion.

Ensure a good distributor on it around 24' mechanical timing at around 2500 RPM (more or less depending on heads and cruise RPM best to have all in at highway cruise for mileage) with about 18' adjustable vacuum advance hooked up to ported. If it pings then set it back as nec.

This should get out of it all it has if the carb is set up right. If it's the original quadrajet with the divorced choke, a new aftermarket manifold will cause problems with that. Edelbrock 7104 Performer RPM quadrajet manifold.
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/EDL-7104
It offers a special choke rod to accommodate the divorced choke, Edelbrock #9172.
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/ed...GoWxoCixnw_wcB

If Vortec heads interest you, let me know I'll tell you what you need.
mechanicalman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2014, 11:03 AM   #8
slikside
Registered User
 
slikside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Diego Co.
Posts: 1,160
Re: Mild 350 sbc build, what do you think?

subd.
__________________
1972 Chevy C-10, SWB, Fleet, 350/350, PS, PB, HEI, mostly stock, Survivor.
slikside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-14-2014, 01:05 PM   #9
Warrens69GMC
Registered User
 
Warrens69GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Safford,AZ
Posts: 3,613
Re: Mild 350 sbc build, what do you think?

If I were to do that to my truck I would go with Xe256/vortec heads/ performer manifold
Warrens69GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2014, 09:02 AM   #10
67 chevelle
Registered User
 
67 chevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: WEST PALM FLORIDA
Posts: 1,174
Re: Mild 350 sbc build, what do you think?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warrens69GMC View Post
If I were to do that to my truck I would go with Xe256/vortec heads/ performer manifold
I think this is great advise , vortec heads are some of the best for all around performance and gas mileage .

performer manifold fits your desires , rpm is more a street strip manifold for higher """rpm"""
__________________
68 Long Fleet , ly6 , turbo 350 , 3-5 drop , original paint , front discs
67 Small window , 7 foot bed , tweaked 6.0 LSX 2004R Medium Olive
58 Apache fleet , 235 , offy intake , dual exhaust , 4 on the floor , red/white
69 Long Fleet , Custom , 6.0, 4l60 , AC , Medium Olive
67 chevelle is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com