The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-03-2017, 01:34 PM   #1
72peace
Senior Member
 
72peace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Bellevue, NE
Posts: 712
3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

I've got a 69 with a 250 6cyl, manual steering, manual brakes, three on the tree and the current rearend is a 3.73. I've got a cleaned up 3.08 rear I was thinking about replacing it with for better gas mileage. But my mechanic say's I don't want to do that because the 3.08 will hurt if I try to tow anything. What do you guys think? I may do some minimal towing but nothing major. Not sure what to go with, help me out here!

Thanks guys,
Nathan
72peace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2017, 01:39 PM   #2
Boog
laying low
 
Boog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Searcy, Ark. USA
Posts: 13,109
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

The factory spec'd that 6 cylinder with the 3.73 for good reason. It's no powerhouse. But since you have a 3.08 rearend ready to go you could swap them out to see how well the 6 manages with it.
__________________
Boog
69 Chevy stepside, 358/T350, 4.11 posi, 4.5/4 drop, rallys, poboy driver
primer is finer
91 Chevy sportside, Tahoe, Yukon & GMC Crewcab All GM..'nuff said.

I stand for the flag and kneel at the cross
Boog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2017, 03:23 PM   #3
weq92f
Registered User
 
weq92f's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Dallas Texas
Posts: 3,040
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

I would stick with the 3.73. With the 3.08 and the 6 cylinder, the fun factor might be diminished too much. That few % mileage improvement probably isn't worth loosing the pep in the truck.

-klb
__________________
67 C10 fleet fuel injected '70 402, 700r4, 3.73 posi
07 335 sport turbo 6sp
94 Trans Am GT LT1 6sp posi -- sold after 22yrs
99 540 sport V8 6sp -- sold
73 240z L24 4sp -- given to friend
68 C10 step 350/350 3.73 open -- sold
weq92f is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2017, 03:27 PM   #4
YBNORML
Registered User
 
YBNORML's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 3,847
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

If you go with the 3:08's the truck will have a high top end but will take forever to get there. And with the truck being underpowered, you probably won't see much of an increase in mileage.
__________________
---------------------------------------------------------------
Jason.

68’ GMC shortbox
https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=794201

72' 2WD Blazer
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=425385

67' LongBox C-10
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=691845

InstaGram ybnorml67
YBNORML is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2017, 04:09 PM   #5
68Gold/white
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Ark City, Kansas
Posts: 3,323
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

Quote:
Originally Posted by YBNORML View Post
If you go with the 3:08's the truck will have a high top end but will take forever to get there. And with the truck being underpowered, you probably won't see much of an increase in mileage.
X2!
These old pickups are HEAVY!
A 250 6 cyl needs all it can get to help move the vehicle along, in ANY kind of driving.
You'd be lugging the engine a lot more with the 3.07 gear.
I don't even recommend using a 3.07 gear with a V8.
There's a darn good reason the factory gear is a 3.73, stay with it.

I've learned a lot driving these older heavy vehicles. If you think you will get any king of great MPG number, it is not likely, especially with an old school engine of any kind.

My point of view is to make it fun to drive, have at least "good" power, tune that combo to do it's best for effeciency, let the MPG number fall where it may. 12-15 MPG are good #'s for one of the old tanks, anything better is awesome!!!
68Gold/white is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2017, 04:08 PM   #6
El Dorado Jim
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: El Dorado Ca
Posts: 3,374
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

I think you would hate the 3:08...clutch will chatter when starting out and not much power with the straight 6
El Dorado Jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-03-2017, 08:51 PM   #7
Alex V.
Registered User
 
Alex V.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Campbellsville, KY
Posts: 888
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

Heavy compared to what? My '67 Suburban, C10, V8/4speed, with lots of HD options, weighs approx. 4,600 lbs., so I doubt the OP's truck weighs much over 4,000 - not light, but not especially heavy compared to today's vehicles. Aerodynamics is far inferior, of course, which is probably a much bigger factor in efficiency loss than weight when compared to a newer vehicle.
__________________
Alex V.
------
1967 C10 Suburban, 350/NP435, Green/Green, PS, PB, HD cooling, charging, shocks, and springs.

1985 GMC C3500 SRW, Sierra Classic, 454/TH400, white/blue.
Alex V. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2017, 10:50 AM   #8
n33k0
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Florida
Posts: 184
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

You might actually get worse MPG with the 3.08 since the I6 will be working harder to get moving from a stop. I don't have much experience with that, just what I was told when I was pondering a similar swap on my truck. I stuck with the 4.11 that my truck came with; MPG sucks, but the truck has plenty of pep.
__________________
Nick
1972 Chevrolet C10 Stepside
n33k0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2017, 12:07 PM   #9
C10 - C90 Bill
Registered User
 
C10 - C90 Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Moneta, VA USA
Posts: 3,075
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

I don't even tow anything with my 3.73's with a 3-Speed that only has the 2.85 1st Gear.

Anything that would have any weight to it anyway.

The great answer to our situation would be an Overdrive Unit. But the Factory ones were rare and the aftermarket ones are too expensive.

I compromised with taller Rear Tires. I put on 265/75/15's and it made a noticeable difference.
__________________
'60-'72 Chev/GMC Fan
GMC 9500 Fan
Detroit Diesel Fan
C10 - C90 Bill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2017, 02:23 PM   #10
LongBox
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 784
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

What C10 - C90 Bill said. I once had a 1/2 ton 250 six Chev pickup with the 4 speed manual. Because it had a 4 speed, the rear gear was higher (lower numerically) than the normal 3.73. That truck was frustrating to drive on the highway, because 4th always seemed too high, and if you put it in third, the engine was spinning it's little heart out. A buddy had virtually the same truck, but with the 3OTT and 3.73. It was much more comfortable to drive at highway speeds.

If you change to the 3.08 or whatever, you'll likely have the same problem.
__________________
Rick

-69 GMC 910 Long Box, 350
-98 Chev Silverado 1500, 350 Vortec 4L60e
-08 Mustang GT Convertible
LongBox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2017, 02:48 PM   #11
Daimler
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 21
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

Just thought I would mention - back in the late 70's I saw a Hot Rod magazine with a picture on the cover of a Chevelle car doing a wheele down the track taken from the back. The nose was in the air. When I read the article it said the guy had to replace the rear end after that run. He was running a 292 six. I never forgot it. Maybe a 250 six is capable of some performance upgrades too?
Daimler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2017, 05:44 PM   #12
weim55
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Larkspur, Colorado
Posts: 916
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daimler View Post
Just thought I would mention - back in the late 70's I saw a Hot Rod magazine with a picture on the cover of a Chevelle car doing a wheele down the track taken from the back. The nose was in the air. When I read the article it said the guy had to replace the rear end after that run. He was running a 292 six. I never forgot it. Maybe a 250 six is capable of some performance upgrades too?
Posted via Mobile Device
weim55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2017, 06:02 PM   #13
LongBox
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 784
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daimler View Post
Just thought I would mention - back in the late 70's I saw a Hot Rod magazine with a picture on the cover of a Chevelle car doing a wheele down the track taken from the back. The nose was in the air. When I read the article it said the guy had to replace the rear end after that run. He was running a 292 six. I never forgot it. Maybe a 250 six is capable of some performance upgrades too?
I think Clifford Research offers lots of performance upgrades for inline 6 engines. Multi-carb intakes, headers, split exhaust, and so on. A 292 six hopped up produces lots of torque, and with headers and a split (dual) exhaust, a really great "bark" out the pipes. I bet there are other companies offering hop-up parts for the 6, and it's probably a good way to go.
__________________
Rick

-69 GMC 910 Long Box, 350
-98 Chev Silverado 1500, 350 Vortec 4L60e
-08 Mustang GT Convertible
LongBox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2017, 03:57 PM   #14
robs71k5
K5drive
 
robs71k5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: burnaby BC Canada
Posts: 809
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

Is that a 308 possi if so I might be interested in it if you decide can't use it
robs71k5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2017, 05:49 PM   #15
weim55
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Larkspur, Colorado
Posts: 916
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

I did this swap myself ('71 C10 250 - column 3 speed). The truck was such a dog with 3.08s it struggled with with even slight grades. Mileage was no better. Went back to 3.73s....

Steve weim55 Colorado
Posted via Mobile Device
weim55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2017, 04:08 PM   #16
trac209
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 1,107
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

I have the exact opposite opinion than most here,I would go with the 3.08 rear. These trucks are no heavier than the 73-86 trucks that replaced them and they had inline 6 with even less gear like 2.56 ratios. My old square had a 250 and a 3speed with 2.56 and it was just fine and I even had a 16 foot travel trailer I towed with it. 3.73 gears on the highway are useless unless you like holding everyone up or like 3000 plus rpm. Im looking to swap out my 3.73 for those as well
trac209 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2017, 04:35 PM   #17
VWNate1
Registered User
 
VWNate1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: So. Cali.
Posts: 2,626
Exclamation Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

As one who lives Way Out West and only has i6 powered old Chevies I can tell you that very few are properly tuned and yes, in the hills they'll be slow but you can fiddle the tires outer diameter to compensate for the 3.08 final drive .

It all depends on your usage .

I drive in the Desert Mountains a _lot_ , I don't tow much but I do haul old engines and Motocycles .

Dammit ~ i have to go now , I'm keen to hear what you do .

I'd jump for joy if I could find a 3.08 final drive .
__________________
-Nate
Geezer
'49 3100 235 W/ Muncie SM420 SOLD
'69 C/10 shortbed sidemount survivor 250 L6 W/ 350TH
VWNate1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2017, 05:03 PM   #18
robs71k5
K5drive
 
robs71k5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: burnaby BC Canada
Posts: 809
Smile Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

I have 308 but not possi riding on 33's behind turbo 350 and a 383 strokes. I don't have a problem with power to keep forward motion but I often wonder about gas mileage . People are always telling me performance would be so much better with 373 but I like to keep the rubber on the tires and know that if I do a gear swap my tire life will be cut into a mere small percentage lol
I can't smoke the 33s from line but my carb and timing might have something to do with that as I was able to with previous carb which was a different quadraujet
308 not sure if they are built for towing or not . I don't see them being a deciding factor for a 6 cyl engine . It all depends what you use it for mainly. I use my truck for pulling a 5000 lb boat but only short distance and twice a year once in the spring and out in the fall. Then it's my daily driver but I think that's where my gas mileage might improve because 308 in the city might be to much and 373 might offer savings. This has been my experience over the last couple years driving with my personal habits . I haven't done a gas mileage calculation simply because that's not why I have this truck and that might give my wife ammunition to use :-)
robs71k5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2017, 11:52 AM   #19
ohboy321
Senior Member
 
ohboy321's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Dunbarton, NH
Posts: 280
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

I have 3.07 axles in my K10, and with my 327 it has lots of giddy up on the flats but I run out of steam pretty quickly on hills.

The truck is new to me and I am still trying to sort out the 327, which apparently was rebuilt by a PO, but could still use some adjustments. I will be rebuilding the older Holley 4 barrel carb in the spring.

Would a properly tuned/adjusted 327 handle the 3.07 axles, or should I look for 3.73s?
ohboy321 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2017, 11:20 AM   #20
tdangle
Senior Member
 
tdangle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Jurupa Valley, Ca
Posts: 1,210
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

Years ago I had a Dodge with a 318 V8, auto trans and 2.94 gears. Towing anything was almost scary. I switched to a 3.5x rear and not only did it tow much better, my mileage actually increased empty with a mix of city and hwy driving by a couple of mpg. I'd stay with 3.73
__________________
Terry

1970 Custom Camper/C20 , GM Crate 350/7004R, Dana 60, factory AC
tdangle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2017, 12:16 PM   #21
LockDoc
The Older Generation


 
LockDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montezuma, Iowa
Posts: 25,398
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

-
Do what I did with my '67. Put an S-10 5 speed overdrive trans in it. It made it a lot more fun to drive, and it will still tow if I need to. I did the swap in 2010 and no problems so far.

LockDoc
__________________
Leon

Locksmith, Specializing In Antique Trucks, Automobiles, & Motorcycles

(My Dually Pickup Project Thread)

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=829820

-
LockDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2017, 12:49 PM   #22
Craftsmen
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Fulton, ny
Posts: 116
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

I removed the six from my truck, also had the Saginaw 3 on the tree with 3:73 open rear end. I dropped on a 350 crate motor and a 4 speed Saginaw, went to the floor with a hurst shifter. I rebuilt the rear end, installed trutrac posi unit and installed a new gear set. I kept the 3:73 gear ratio, glad I did. I would never want to go any higher gear. This is a fun combination best of both worlds, cruising and playin.
__________________
1970 C10 SWB
Craftsmen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2017, 09:12 PM   #23
Mike C
Registered User
 
Mike C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 7,715
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

Quote:
Originally Posted by LockDoc View Post
-
Do what I did with my '67. Put an S-10 5 speed overdrive trans in it. It made it a lot more fun to drive, and it will still tow if I need to. I did the swap in 2010 and no problems so far.

LockDoc
This. This is THE answer to keeping a 6 in the truck. And an S-10 T5 from the 4.3 is easy to source. It's the V8 trans that is hard to get. Your truck will do EVERYTHING better with the T5. Tow, accelerate, cruise, MPG.

New cars make great power and they correct themselves for altitude and temperature, but what makes the biggest differences is the transmissions. You will absolute LOVE the T5.
__________________
44 Willys MB
52 M38A1
64 Corvette Coupe
68 Camaro 'vert LT1 & TH700
69 Z/28 355 12.6's @110
69 Chevy Short Step 4 1/2"/7" drop
72 Jimmy 4WD 4spd 4" & 35's
02 GMC 2500HD 4x4 Duramax
Mike C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2017, 08:29 PM   #24
TwoFiftyShifter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Gwinnett GA
Posts: 1,803
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

Quote:
Originally Posted by ohboy321 View Post
I have 3.07 axles in my K10, and with my 327 it has lots of giddy up on the flats but I run out of steam pretty quickly on hills.

The truck is new to me and I am still trying to sort out the 327, which apparently was rebuilt by a PO, but could still use some adjustments. I will be rebuilding the older Holley 4 barrel carb in the spring.

Would a properly tuned/adjusted 327 handle the 3.07 axles, or should I look for 3.73s?

Automatic - 3.73s
4 speed - 3.08s
__________________
1982 K10 SWB
1987 V20 - Sold - Doh!
TwoFiftyShifter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2017, 08:36 PM   #25
Craftsmen
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Fulton, ny
Posts: 116
Re: 3.08 or 3.73 Rearend

There were 3 or 4 different ratio 4 speeds, with 4th gear all 1:1 ratio. All personal preference I guess on what your doing with the truck.
__________________
1970 C10 SWB
Craftsmen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com