Engine placement - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

H8tulooze1 · 03-27-2023, 11:41 PM

Do you have to move the engine forward so the valve cover doesnt hit the firewall?

**Accelo** · 03-28-2023, 02:07 AM

The motor mounts where they bolt to the frame can be moved to the next set of holes so the valve cover fits. You have a 6 cylinder? Only mentioned a valve cover singular?

Joyridin · 03-28-2023, 07:44 AM

I have an LT engine, not an LS, but the dimensions are about the same. I had to move it forward 1.75", which was the next set of holes on the adapter plates. This gave me about 1" of room behind the valve covers. It worked well with the 6l trans as the tailshaft was almost in exactly the same place as the TH400 and I had to shorten the driveshaft 3/4".

H8tulooze1 · 03-28-2023, 09:53 AM

Im sorry I should have said I have a LS 5.3. I thought I read some people made it work and some havent. I have a dirty Dingo cross-member.

joesscamaro · 03-29-2023, 02:23 PM

'65 C10 with LS1 and I had to move my mounts to the furthest forward set of holes to allow for firewall clearance.

bigmoe · 03-30-2023, 03:28 PM

65 C10 with 5.3 Gen IV. I have the adapter plates with 4 positions and I'm in the 3rd position away from the firewall.

03-27-2023, 11:41 PM	#1
H8tulooze1 Registered User Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: So Cal Posts: 37	Engine placement Do you have to move the engine forward so the valve cover doesnt hit the firewall? __________________ 1967 Nova SS LS9 900HP 1965 Malibu SS Convertible F/S 1965 Chevelle 2-Door Wagon F/S 1972 K5 Blazer 5.3

03-28-2023, 02:07 AM	#2
Accelo Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2015 Location: washington Posts: 2,299	Re: Engine placement The motor mounts where they bolt to the frame can be moved to the next set of holes so the valve cover fits. You have a 6 cylinder? Only mentioned a valve cover singular?

03-28-2023, 07:44 AM	#3
Joyridin Registered User Join Date: Sep 2020 Location: Cleveland, Ohio Posts: 558	Re: Engine placement I have an LT engine, not an LS, but the dimensions are about the same. I had to move it forward 1.75", which was the next set of holes on the adapter plates. This gave me about 1" of room behind the valve covers. It worked well with the 6l trans as the tailshaft was almost in exactly the same place as the TH400 and I had to shorten the driveshaft 3/4".

03-28-2023, 09:53 AM	#4
H8tulooze1 Registered User Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: So Cal Posts: 37	Re: Engine placement Im sorry I should have said I have a LS 5.3. I thought I read some people made it work and some havent. I have a dirty Dingo cross-member. __________________ 1967 Nova SS LS9 900HP 1965 Malibu SS Convertible F/S 1965 Chevelle 2-Door Wagon F/S 1972 K5 Blazer 5.3

03-29-2023, 02:23 PM	#5
joesscamaro Registered User Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Newport, North Carolina Posts: 643	Re: Engine placement '65 C10 with LS1 and I had to move my mounts to the furthest forward set of holes to allow for firewall clearance.

03-30-2023, 03:28 PM	#6
bigmoe Registered User Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Brandon, Manitoba, Canada Posts: 995	Re: Engine placement 65 C10 with 5.3 Gen IV. I have the adapter plates with 4 positions and I'm in the 3rd position away from the firewall. __________________ Build thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=811843



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.