The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-16-2023, 07:10 PM   #1
87chevy.com
BMW & ASE Master Certified
 
87chevy.com's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,266
square body front coil over questions

I've been looking at coil overs, I don't know why but I prefer the look of Detroit Speed coil over system vs some others: QA1, Ride Tech
The Detroit Speed appears to have a longer coil over shock assembly vs the other 2, the coil springs look a lot beefier than Ride Tech's.. in the picture, it looks skinny and the coils are spaced far apart...

Detroit Speed doesn't offer anything other than a full front cross member kit and I wont be going down that path. 2 reasons, one it looks like it will lower the truck way more than I want, and 2 its just expensive. I have Wilwood 2" Pro c10 spindle and the drop is just right in the front for me.

Control arm wise, I like the way the Ride Tech control arms are built at the bushings vs QA1.. not sure what kind of bushings either use, but it looks like Ride Tech has more bushing material...


I did a search using "coil over", and not many posts for the square bodies.


What makes the coil over better than stock setup.. is it mostly all due to the quality shock and longer length? I mean, its the same 2 components, but 2 different configurations ...

Was thinking getting Ride Tech control arms and build a upper shock mount bracket for a set coil overs..

Also, how do you pick which coil spring rate for the front... is it buy one, see how it is and if you don't like it throw another 250$ at it with the next spring rate?


Thanks,
clint
__________________
1987 Silverado - L83 5.3 w/ 6L80e ,A/C,P/W,P/L,TILT, HID projectors, Wilwood C-10 Pro Spindles w/ 2018 silverado front brakes & C-5 Corvette Rear Disc Brakes
1999 BMW 528i - 5.7 LS1 w/ 4l60e, Ford 8.8 IRS w31 spline posi & FX-r projector retrofit

New project: 2006 BMW x5 6cyl AWD to L83 6l80e 4wd to 2WD / RWD

A poor man buy's it twice

finally got my domain name back, 87chevy.com.... site rework in progress
87chevy.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-17-2023, 12:20 PM   #2
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
Re: square body front coil over questions

Quote:
Originally Posted by 87chevy.com View Post
I've been looking at coil overs, I don't know why but I prefer the look of Detroit Speed coil over system vs some others: QA1, Ride Tech
The Detroit Speed appears to have a longer coil over shock assembly vs the other 2, the coil springs look a lot beefier than Ride Tech's.. in the picture, it looks skinny and the coils are spaced far apart...

Detroit Speed doesn't offer anything other than a full front cross member kit and I wont be going down that path. 2 reasons, one it looks like it will lower the truck way more than I want, and 2 its just expensive. I have Wilwood 2" Pro c10 spindle and the drop is just right in the front for me.

Control arm wise, I like the way the Ride Tech control arms are built at the bushings vs QA1.. not sure what kind of bushings either use, but it looks like Ride Tech has more bushing material...


I did a search using "coil over", and not many posts for the square bodies.


What makes the coil over better than stock setup.. is it mostly all due to the quality shock and longer length? I mean, its the same 2 components, but 2 different configurations ...

Was thinking getting Ride Tech control arms and build a upper shock mount bracket for a set coil overs..

Also, how do you pick which coil spring rate for the front... is it buy one, see how it is and if you don't like it throw another 250$ at it with the next spring rate?


Thanks,
clint
Coil-Overs aren't 'better' vs. the separate coil & shock set-up as far as functionality goes.

They're easier to 'tune' but as you indicated that requires swapping to slightly different rate springs which adds cost. They also allow dialing in the heights more specifically vs a traditional set-up.

Doing your own C/O allows you to engineer things the way you want but you need to know/understand how it all comes together to yield the same or better results as one of the mass produced kits. The longer the shock stroke, the better the ride when matched w/the spring rate. Packaging is where the DIY approach can be beneficial.

Detroit Speeds C10 kit is basically a 4/5 - 5/7 drop & that's w/a drop spindle. Ridetechs is similar as far as drop dimensions.

Initial spring rate is derived from the vehicles specific set-up (motor type; F/R/corner weights; accessories; etc).
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.

Last edited by SCOTI; 05-17-2023 at 12:26 PM.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com