|
03-01-2024, 11:22 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Catskill Mountains,NY
Posts: 8,716
|
Blueprint motor ?
I just got off the phone with the tech dept . Wanted to know if the stock Ram horn manifolds would bolt up to the heads . Tech said they recommend headers and I do not want to use headers on the truck . Tech said that the Ram horn manifolds may work . So to those who have used these engines did you run into problems with the exhaust manifolds ?
__________________
Mark 72 c20 custom camper Husky edition, 66 SS396 Chevelle 1964 Hawk, 63 Avanti,62 lark 1969 AMX , 1968 c20 stepside ,85 K20 1977 Suburban sold 68 anniversary. |
03-01-2024, 11:31 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 1,457
|
Re: Blueprint motor ?
I put 2.5 inch Corvette manifolds on mine, they work just fine.
__________________
DAVE Edmonton, Alberta 1959 Apache 1967 K20 1968 C20 1970 C10 1972 GMC 2500 1981 C10 |
03-01-2024, 11:58 AM | #3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Ca
Posts: 630
|
Re: Blueprint motor ?
Can't answer the port alignment question. I think the best way to verify alignment would be to get hold of a header flange and compare its alignment to the head and then to the ram horn mani.
Why are you avoiding the recomended header? |
03-01-2024, 01:07 PM | #4 | ||
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Catskill Mountains,NY
Posts: 8,716
|
Re: Blueprint motor ?
Quote:
Quote:
I really don’t like headers on fairly stock motors no need for them and there’s always figment issues and the rust fairly quick . I have ceramic headman headers on my Chevelle after 3 or seasons they look like crap .
__________________
Mark 72 c20 custom camper Husky edition, 66 SS396 Chevelle 1964 Hawk, 63 Avanti,62 lark 1969 AMX , 1968 c20 stepside ,85 K20 1977 Suburban sold 68 anniversary. |
||
03-01-2024, 02:26 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Edmonton Alberta
Posts: 1,457
|
Re: Blueprint motor ?
Yes, they are just another half inch. Also, they go straight down instead of angling off at a 45 degree as the stock truck ones do.
I don't like the maintenance that headers require, so when I read somewhere that the 2.5 inch manifolds flow basically the same as headers do, I went with that option. I also have 2.5 inch exhaust. Sounds good.
__________________
DAVE Edmonton, Alberta 1959 Apache 1967 K20 1968 C20 1970 C10 1972 GMC 2500 1981 C10 Last edited by dagnabbitt; 03-01-2024 at 02:50 PM. |
03-01-2024, 02:52 PM | #6 |
Who Changed This?
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 10,676
|
Re: Blueprint motor ?
The 1/2" is larger at the outlet. I had a SHP 327 in my '64 Impala, and every head that was on it fit the manifolds fine. I'd guess that BPE just wants you to run headers. I've never seen that era SBC that required a different exhaust manifold. In fact, I put a 350 Target engine in a '64 Corvette with no manifold issues. That was in '82, so that year engine.
__________________
~Steven '70 Chevy 3/4T Longhorn CST 402/400/3.56 Custom Camper Simi Valley, CA |
03-01-2024, 02:59 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 774
|
Re: Blueprint motor ?
my 67 327 exhaust manifolds "fit" but #7 & 8 plug was right against the manifold on my BPE. I just put Patriot mid length headers on which fit perfect
Understand BPE makes performance motors (modern AL heads & cam) so typically one wants headers to complement that. BPE motors are new, including block, and come with a warranty. Mine has been trouble and leak free for a few years now. |
03-01-2024, 04:57 PM | #8 |
Who Changed This?
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 10,676
|
Re: Blueprint motor ?
OK, I see why.
__________________
~Steven '70 Chevy 3/4T Longhorn CST 402/400/3.56 Custom Camper Simi Valley, CA |
03-01-2024, 08:43 PM | #9 |
Active Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Ooltewah, TN
Posts: 166
|
I just finished installing stock aftermarket manifolds onto my bpe cruiser engine last weekend. I had to do a little massaging with the grinder to clear the valve covers, otherwise they fit well. I don’t have any issues with plugs/wires clearances.
Posted via Mobile Device |
03-04-2024, 11:44 AM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Catskill Mountains,NY
Posts: 8,716
|
Re: Blueprint motor ?
Thanks for the info . I’m going to use the stock ram horns if I run into a problem then ill do something different
__________________
Mark 72 c20 custom camper Husky edition, 66 SS396 Chevelle 1964 Hawk, 63 Avanti,62 lark 1969 AMX , 1968 c20 stepside ,85 K20 1977 Suburban sold 68 anniversary. |
03-04-2024, 12:57 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 774
|
Re: Blueprint motor ?
This style of manifold was on my 327 which did bolt to the BPE heads but 7&8 plug boots were slammed against that manifold. The Ram Horn may work as noted
BPE uses raised port heads, more modern design that gen 1 SBC. |
03-04-2024, 09:32 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Catskill Mountains,NY
Posts: 8,716
|
Re: Blueprint motor ?
My 327 manifolds on the 68 are the same . The engine is going in my 72 with a 350
__________________
Mark 72 c20 custom camper Husky edition, 66 SS396 Chevelle 1964 Hawk, 63 Avanti,62 lark 1969 AMX , 1968 c20 stepside ,85 K20 1977 Suburban sold 68 anniversary. |
03-04-2024, 10:40 PM | #13 |
Active Member
Join Date: Sep 2023
Location: randolph va
Posts: 157
|
Re: Blueprint motor ?
The older I get the less I think of headers , When I was a kid, I spent half my money on tires and the other half on starter solenoids. lol
__________________
Old dogs and children and watermelon wine |
03-05-2024, 03:57 PM | #14 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: East Tn (In the heart of the Smoky Mtns)
Posts: 1,887
|
Re: Blueprint motor ?
Quote:
Headers a cheap, but they are hot. I lost count of the number of starters I’ve replaced. I could have paid for a set of Ramshorn manifolds three times over. Ramshorns are on my list of parts in the future |
|
03-06-2024, 07:06 PM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 774
|
Re: Blueprint motor ?
mid length headers are not a starter heat problem.
Ceramic coated headers are considerably cooler than non-coated gear reduction starters are also smaller and offer considerably more cranking effort. I bought my REMY GR starter on rockauto for around $70, for 153 tooth FW My BPE motor with mid length headers and starter in my 67 Camaro for refrence |
04-12-2024, 12:34 PM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Catskill Mountains,NY
Posts: 8,716
|
Re: Blueprint motor ?
The manifolds will clear the plugs just need to grind a little on the casting to clear the valve cover . Looking at the manifold not sure if this is a problem or not the center ports are slightly lower than the front and rear . Can see light with a straight edge . They never leaked in the old motor . I bought these because Blue print emphasizes to use performance gaskets not Stock
__________________
Mark 72 c20 custom camper Husky edition, 66 SS396 Chevelle 1964 Hawk, 63 Avanti,62 lark 1969 AMX , 1968 c20 stepside ,85 K20 1977 Suburban sold 68 anniversary. |
04-12-2024, 01:12 PM | #17 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2022
Location: Ca
Posts: 630
|
Re: Blueprint motor ?
You may want to look at Remflex gaskets. I used them on the racing LS2 with zero issues. I bought a pair of cheapo Edelbrock heads for the truck SBC. The ports were a little off for the headers I had. It put the flange openings a bit tight to the head port and blew out the standard gaskets within days. I thought of the Remflex I'd used on the LS and have not had an issue since.
|
04-12-2024, 01:26 PM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Moorpark, CA
Posts: 774
|
Re: Blueprint motor ?
+1 on Remflex. BPE tech actually looked up a few ones that would work with my BPE and manifolds from my 327 it replaced
|
04-12-2024, 01:44 PM | #19 |
Who Changed This?
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 10,676
|
Re: Blueprint motor ?
If you have a long enough stationary belt sander maybe you bring it back close to "Blanchard ground", like factory. I used a flat bastard file to dress some manifolds on an old Buick. Took a lot of time.
__________________
~Steven '70 Chevy 3/4T Longhorn CST 402/400/3.56 Custom Camper Simi Valley, CA |
04-29-2024, 07:59 PM | #20 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: Catskill Mountains,NY
Posts: 8,716
|
Re: Blueprint motor ?
Well I’m starting to mount the accessories and manifolds . Never had an engine with aluminum heads . Should I use anti seize on the bolts ?
__________________
Mark 72 c20 custom camper Husky edition, 66 SS396 Chevelle 1964 Hawk, 63 Avanti,62 lark 1969 AMX , 1968 c20 stepside ,85 K20 1977 Suburban sold 68 anniversary. |
04-29-2024, 08:31 PM | #21 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 492
|
Re: Blueprint motor ?
yes, on anything that is threading into the aluminum use anti seize for sure.
__________________
The Twins: 1968 C10 SWB - Blue 327/5 Speed 1968 Camaro SS/RS - Blue 327/4speed C10 Build Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=833278 The "Others" 1933 Ford Pickup (Camaro in disguise) 2017 Camaro SS Life long Chevy guy |
04-29-2024, 09:24 PM | #22 |
Who Changed This?
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 10,676
|
Re: Blueprint motor ?
In fact, if there is room to install the manifolds with studs, I'd do that.
__________________
~Steven '70 Chevy 3/4T Longhorn CST 402/400/3.56 Custom Camper Simi Valley, CA |
Bookmarks |
|
|