More pictures of "that" 75' C10. - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

BaggedC10 · 01-28-2004, 04:06 AM

I'm sorry but this truck is so sweet!

TIMSPEED · 01-28-2004, 05:20 AM

I really like Fred's truck.

Hopefully one day, mine might be that sweet.

Blue Beard · 01-28-2004, 09:52 AM

That is one sweet looking truck.........is it bagged..?

72MARIO · 01-28-2004, 12:20 PM

It' Shaved.

LOHRTBT · 01-28-2004, 01:04 PM

Very clean !! Not big on the Blue but love teh truck!

*Zilverado* · 01-28-2004, 01:14 PM

Since I have no interest in lowering my own truck, I've never paid too much attention to the details, but I have a question regarding this truck.

There seems to be a fair bit of negative camber in the front wheels, or is it just an optical illusion. If it's for real, is this normal? Or is it a result of the drop, or bags, or whatever?

Just a question from the curious peanut gallery.

Thanks,

Low87on20s · 01-28-2004, 01:52 PM

I love the truck! He needs to ditch those tail lights though.

Prerunner1982 · 01-28-2004, 01:54 PM

Zilverado, this happens when the bags are aired out.. when its at driving height the wheels have the correct camber....

i like the big ford in the back ground... 15" lift and lil @ss tires.....

*Zilverado* · 01-28-2004, 02:02 PM

Thanks for the info Jon.

Who says learning can't be fun...

shavedchevy · 01-28-2004, 09:18 PM

Just love shaved trucks. The color scheme is awsome and very clean. I agree lose the taillights. But who cares, I think I could overlook the taillights the truck was given to me.Ha Ha

phantom dually · 01-28-2004, 09:35 PM

NICE!!

79Silv4x4 · 01-28-2004, 09:36 PM

It's definitely a sweet ride but for me the two tone doesn't work on the front fender--it just doesn't look right with the body lines.

BaggedC10 · 01-29-2004, 12:33 AM

Yes, it's bagged.

Bowed · 01-29-2004, 01:21 AM

No doubt , it's worth a second , third and even a fourth look !

**N2TRUX** · 01-29-2004, 10:58 AM

Zilverado just wanted to further comment on Prerunner1982's response. On a bagged vehicle you find what pressure gives you a comfortable ride height. Once that is determined you have the front end aligned at that pressure. When you lay it out the wheels will lean in, but when you air it up to the proper pressure your alignment returns.

I think the truck is very good looking. I don't have a real problem with the clear tails because they blend with the color. Maybe a better choice would have been to shave the tails too.

The problem I have with this truck is the stance. I am all for a laid out truck, but I don't agree with the rear laying lower than the front. Look at the lines of the truck. It looks bent in the middle. This is because of the rear being lower than the front. Call me old school, but if a hot rod doesn't have a proper stance, then it ain't a hot rod...

BaggedC10 · 01-29-2004, 12:37 PM

I want to know how he's that low w/ the stock driveshaft.

PHOENIX · 01-29-2004, 01:46 PM

If anyone knows what paint that silver is can you send me a PM please.

Thanks.

1974StepSide · 02-12-2004, 01:03 PM

Here's another photo of "that" truck from a recent show in sacramento

apstguy · 02-12-2004, 03:06 PM

I can't see the pics! They say "remote linking is no longer allowed"

**N2TRUX** · 02-12-2004, 06:54 PM

Yeah. it was on Streetsourcemag.com They don't allow linking anymore. What a bunch of losers...

*1FaastC10* · 02-12-2004, 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by BaggedC10
I want to know how he's that low w/ the stock driveshaft.

you're the first person i've ever come across that ever mentioned driveshaft clearance being a problem. being that it does have tires on it (doesnt it?) i dont see why there'd be any problem at all with driveshaft clearance.

BaggedC10 · 02-12-2004, 11:57 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by 1974StepSide
Here's another photo of "that" truck from a recent show in sacramento

I saw this truck at the Sport Truck Showcase (Autorama) too. I wasn't very impressed.

The grille, front bumper, vent windows, and interior need attention. I know it's still under construction though.

BaggedC10 · 02-13-2004, 12:01 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by 1FaastC10
you're the first person i've ever come across that ever mentioned driveshaft clearance being a problem. being that it does have tires on it (doesnt it?) i dont see why there'd be any problem at all with driveshaft clearance.

Yes, my truck has wheels and tires installed right now. The driveshaft bottoms out under the cab when aired out.

**swervin ervin** · 02-13-2004, 12:11 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by N2TRUX
Yeah. it was on Streetsourcemag.com They don't allow linking anymore. What a bunch of losers...

I agree Ken, but bandwidth costs dollars. It's not free. With a popular site and everyone linking using their bandwidth, I imagine it was adding up.

A better way would be to save them to your hard drive and then attach them to the thread. They can't stop linking from your hard drive for sure.

01-28-2004, 04:06 AM	#1
BaggedC10 Under construction! Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: NorCal Posts: 1,065	More pictures of "that" 75' C10. I'm sorry but this truck is so sweet! __________________ 2001 Silverado bagged on 22's. Sold

01-28-2004, 05:20 AM	#2
TIMSPEED Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Modesto, CA Posts: 1,321	I really like Fred's truck. Hopefully one day, mine might be that sweet. __________________ I have a few cars... See Them Here

01-28-2004, 09:52 AM	#3
Blue Beard Registered User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Washington State Posts: 8,834	That is one sweet looking truck.........is it bagged..? __________________ 1970 Chev CST 2003 Harley Fatboy 1975 Chevrolet Step Van 1956 Chev Bel Air 1977 Blazer 2WD For Sale $3000.00 1978 Blazer 2WD For Sale $7000.00 1978 Silverado 2005 Monte Carlo

01-28-2004, 12:20 PM	#4
72MARIO Registered User Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: Huntsville Ontario Canada Posts: 4,052	It' Shaved. __________________ 1968 Suburban numbers matching all original truck now equipped with 6.0/4L80 on Accuair http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=625017 1967 C/20 6.0/4L80 Roofing Truck 1990 V2500 Suburban "Plow Truck" 2005 TAHOE DD

01-28-2004, 01:04 PM	#5
LOHRTBT BeWarE tHe eViL CrAnkTOe! Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Yukon, OK Posts: 3,605	Very clean !! Not big on the Blue but love teh truck! __________________ ~Dave~ You can call me Mike, Mike Oxlong - 1986 Chevy SWB - Stock for now - *1986 Chevy Custom SWB* *Stolen 6/26/05* - 1985 Chevy SWB SOLD - 1999 T/A Some mods www.cardomain.com/id/ramairdave AIM Screenname - Jester84

01-28-2004, 01:14 PM	#6
Zilverado Account Suspended Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Posts: 798	Since I have no interest in lowering my own truck, I've never paid too much attention to the details, but I have a question regarding this truck. There seems to be a fair bit of negative camber in the front wheels, or is it just an optical illusion. If it's for real, is this normal? Or is it a result of the drop, or bags, or whatever? Just a question from the curious peanut gallery. Thanks,

01-28-2004, 01:52 PM	#7
Low87on20s Live from Atlanta Join Date: May 2003 Location: Atlanta, GA Posts: 511	I love the truck! He needs to ditch those tail lights though. __________________ Paul

01-28-2004, 01:54 PM	#8
Prerunner1982 Registered User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Edmond, OK Posts: 5,906	Zilverado, this happens when the bags are aired out.. when its at driving height the wheels have the correct camber.... i like the big ford in the back ground... 15" lift and lil @ss tires..... __________________ Jon 1982 Chevy Silverado 350/th350.... RETIRED 1993 Jeep XJ 2 door(Cherokee) 4wd 4.0ltr/AX-15 (5spd)/NP231 .... Oklahoma Roll Call

01-28-2004, 02:02 PM	#9
Zilverado Account Suspended Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Posts: 798	Thanks for the info Jon. Who says learning can't be fun...

01-28-2004, 09:18 PM	#10
shavedchevy Registered User Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Posts: 315	Just love shaved trucks. The color scheme is awsome and very clean. I agree lose the taillights. But who cares, I think I could overlook the taillights the truck was given to me.Ha Ha __________________ Dennis

01-28-2004, 09:35 PM	#11
phantom dually Project92 SWB stepside Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Louisville KY Posts: 4,793	NICE!! __________________ 92 C1500 stepside 496 Stroker Competiton Engineering Ladder bars/QA1 coilovers. Dana 60 rear with 4.10 gear and posi. Bonspeed Palisade 20x12 in rear w/335/30/20 and 20x8.5 front w/245/40/20. 5/8 drop with Belltech springs/DJM spindles/drop shocks. WWS Progress thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=140448

01-28-2004, 09:36 PM	#12
79Silv4x4 Workaholic Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Katy, TX Posts: 1,589	It's definitely a sweet ride but for me the two tone doesn't work on the front fender--it just doesn't look right with the body lines.

01-29-2004, 12:33 AM	#13
BaggedC10 Under construction! Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: NorCal Posts: 1,065	Yes, it's bagged. __________________ 2001 Silverado bagged on 22's. Sold

01-29-2004, 01:21 AM	#14
Bowed Registered User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: where it's hot Posts: 1,059	No doubt , it's worth a second , third and even a fourth look !

01-29-2004, 10:58 AM	#15
N2TRUX Happy to be here Join Date: Mar 2000 Location: Cypress, TX Posts: 39,023	Zilverado just wanted to further comment on Prerunner1982's response. On a bagged vehicle you find what pressure gives you a comfortable ride height. Once that is determined you have the front end aligned at that pressure. When you lay it out the wheels will lean in, but when you air it up to the proper pressure your alignment returns. I think the truck is very good looking. I don't have a real problem with the clear tails because they blend with the color. Maybe a better choice would have been to shave the tails too. The problem I have with this truck is the stance. I am all for a laid out truck, but I don't agree with the rear laying lower than the front. Look at the lines of the truck. It looks bent in the middle. This is because of the rear being lower than the front. Call me old school, but if a hot rod doesn't have a proper stance, then it ain't a hot rod... __________________ Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com Articles- "Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab "Elwood" the77_Remix 85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett" "Refining Sierra"



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

01-29-2004, 12:37 PM	#16
BaggedC10 Under construction! Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: NorCal Posts: 1,065	I want to know how he's that low w/ the stock driveshaft. __________________ 2001 Silverado bagged on 22's. Sold

01-29-2004, 01:46 PM	#17
PHOENIX Registered User Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Phoenix, Arizona Posts: 4,703	If anyone knows what paint that silver is can you send me a PM please. Thanks. __________________ * AVOID: LOPER'S PERMORANCE / LOPERSPEED.COM OF PHOENIX, AZ & COTTMAN TRANSMISSION *

02-12-2004, 01:03 PM	#18
1974StepSide Play it Loud... Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: East San Jose, CA Posts: 465	Here's another photo of "that" truck from a recent show in sacramento Attached Images __________________ Big Moe =-=-=-= 1974 Cheyenne Super Stepside, 350/400, Hooker Headers, Flowmaster Mufflers... Needs new doors, fenders, hood, and paint. 1952 Chevy Pickup waiting to be brought back home!

02-12-2004, 03:06 PM	#19
apstguy LED King Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Sacramento, CA Posts: 2,088	I can't see the pics! They say "remote linking is no longer allowed" __________________ Tyler 1985 C10 305 w/ Bowtie OD TH700R4 3.42 LSD 202,000 miles 2006 Ford Focus ZX3 5-speed Stick 2016 Chevy Spark EV Gone: 2002.5 VW GTI 24v VR6 Gone: 2008 VW R32

02-12-2004, 06:54 PM	#20
N2TRUX Happy to be here Join Date: Mar 2000 Location: Cypress, TX Posts: 39,023	Yeah. it was on Streetsourcemag.com They don't allow linking anymore. What a bunch of losers...

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.