Why dont people reradius their wheelwell arches? - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

Stingray42 · 03-19-2004, 01:55 AM

Question!

Why dont people reradius their wheelwell arches when they put a 88-98 stepside box on their 67-72 Chevy and GMC Trucks? I love that they are keepin em on the road and all, and some of them are very very nice that I see, but why not go that extra step and have the wheelwells on the box redone so that they are similar to the fronts???

Is it very difficult or expensive for a bodyshop to do? I have seen some trucks that look like they have had tens upon tens of thousands of dollars poured into em, but whynot fix this rather ocvious detail?!?

lol...thanks!

67cst · 03-19-2004, 03:18 AM

thats a damn good question! if i had a newer style box it would HAVE to be done or id go boxless until i found the proper year box

1969 GMC · 03-19-2004, 03:23 AM

im guessing they just don't want to fool with the bodywork. they may have already painted the front clip and would not want to go back and spend who knows how much cash making them match.

but i do agree, it looks bad. i actually think the '88-up "Shoebox Chevies" are plug ugly and dime a dozen, but thats just MO. I don't think the 2 styles fuse well, even though body lines may.

Stingray42 · 03-19-2004, 04:15 AM

ok...

oh and i meant that the box would be made to match the front fenders, not the other way around. I agree that they dont match up too well (body lines, yes) but the taillights dont do much for the truck (i do like 88-98 chevs tho) when the tails are shaved and put in the roll pan, then its good looking. Any other opinions on the wheelwells?

Russell · 03-19-2004, 04:42 AM

I don't see why you couldn't take an old bedside and cut out the wheel arches, then do a bit of reforming and tack them into place? I know what you are getting at, and have often wondered myself...

tom hand · 03-19-2004, 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Russell
I don't see why you couldn't take an old bedside and cut out the wheel arches, then do a bit of reforming and tack them into place? I know what you are getting at, and have often wondered myself...

The late model bedsides are fiberglass......so there is no lowbuck fix to the problem

robertwb · 03-19-2004, 07:33 AM

I've got a magazine with a '70 truck with the wheel arches from a '89 truck(and much more too)on the stock bed no less- and it sure does look good,I think it's because the 89 wheel openings are more square,it just looks right...wish I had a scanner

it's in june 2002 issue of custom classic trucks

65StreetCruiser · 03-19-2004, 10:05 AM

I agree with tom hand, the bedsides are fiberglass. To make the wheelwell arches look right you would have to make a mold of the original arches, then make fiberglass arches to graft onto the new style bedsides. Very labor intensive, but if you want it to look right I guess you could go the exta mile.

ronh72c10 · 03-19-2004, 11:33 AM

I suppose you could chop up a set of http://www.usbody.com fiberglass bedsides (or maybe their stepside fenders) it would be really expensive though.

Ron

Russell · 03-19-2004, 11:50 AM

Were all late model stepsides fiberglass? The bedsides on our 92 were steel...

Smooth68 · 03-19-2004, 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Russell
Were all late model stepsides fiberglass? The bedsides on our 92 were steel...

The actual bed was steel but the bed sides from the top body line down were fiberglass...at least every 88-98 model I've seen.

Stingray42 · 03-19-2004, 01:10 PM

lmao.... I forgot that the late model beds were fiberglass....

guess that screws things up pretty good....

I'll have to think on that one....lol

stepside71 · 03-19-2004, 07:36 PM

IMO the bed SHOULD match the rest of the truck !

boozel67 · 03-20-2004, 08:39 AM

i have one on my '67 # 1 reason it s there FREEBEE. i am saving for a us body bed. then the problem is trying to matsh paint stupid me tossed out every thing about the paint.

Blue Beard · 03-20-2004, 10:13 AM

How about someone doing a photoshop of this idea...?

03-19-2004, 01:55 AM	#1
Stingray42 Woot. Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Stouffville, Ontario Posts: 2,291	Why dont people reradius their wheelwell arches? Question! Why dont people reradius their wheelwell arches when they put a 88-98 stepside box on their 67-72 Chevy and GMC Trucks? I love that they are keepin em on the road and all, and some of them are very very nice that I see, but why not go that extra step and have the wheelwells on the box redone so that they are similar to the fronts??? Is it very difficult or expensive for a bodyshop to do? I have seen some trucks that look like they have had tens upon tens of thousands of dollars poured into em, but whynot fix this rather ocvious detail?!? lol...thanks! __________________ Clarkson 96 Chevy RCLB 4.3 2WD

03-19-2004, 03:18 AM	#2
67cst i love summertime Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Kelowna BC Posts: 4,303	thats a damn good question! if i had a newer style box it would HAVE to be done or id go boxless until i found the proper year box __________________ 1967 shortbox stepside Chevy, 365 hp 327, th400. GLOVE BOX LIGHTS FORSALE, click link for info http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=273724

03-19-2004, 03:23 AM	#3
1969 GMC Registered User Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: The Rubber City Posts: 5,498	im guessing they just don't want to fool with the bodywork. they may have already painted the front clip and would not want to go back and spend who knows how much cash making them match. but i do agree, it looks bad. i actually think the '88-up "Shoebox Chevies" are plug ugly and dime a dozen, but thats just MO. I don't think the 2 styles fuse well, even though body lines may. __________________ 1969 GMC K2500 1996 Honda Accord 2007 Kawasaki KLR 650

03-19-2004, 04:15 AM	#4
Stingray42 Woot. Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Stouffville, Ontario Posts: 2,291	ok... oh and i meant that the box would be made to match the front fenders, not the other way around. I agree that they dont match up too well (body lines, yes) but the taillights dont do much for the truck (i do like 88-98 chevs tho) when the tails are shaved and put in the roll pan, then its good looking. Any other opinions on the wheelwells? __________________ Clarkson 96 Chevy RCLB 4.3 2WD

03-19-2004, 04:42 AM	#5
Russell Professional Grade Join Date: May 2003 Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta Posts: 7,915	I don't see why you couldn't take an old bedside and cut out the wheel arches, then do a bit of reforming and tack them into place? I know what you are getting at, and have often wondered myself... __________________ 1995 Chevrolet 2 Door Tahoe (6.6L LBZ Duramax / ZF6 / NP241 with 1 ton solid axle swap)

03-19-2004, 07:33 AM	#7
robertwb Registered User Join Date: May 2003 Location: brooksville-fla Posts: 77	I've got a magazine with a '70 truck with the wheel arches from a '89 truck(and much more too)on the stock bed no less- and it sure does look good,I think it's because the 89 wheel openings are more square,it just looks right...wish I had a scanner it's in june 2002 issue of custom classic trucks __________________ 1972 LWB 4x4 1970 LWB 2wd 1971 chevelle 1972 datsun PL-521/nissan

03-19-2004, 10:05 AM	#8
65StreetCruiser It Is What It Is Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Natchitoches, La. Posts: 155	I agree with tom hand, the bedsides are fiberglass. To make the wheelwell arches look right you would have to make a mold of the original arches, then make fiberglass arches to graft onto the new style bedsides. Very labor intensive, but if you want it to look right I guess you could go the exta mile. __________________ Kevin 65 Chevy SWB Fleetside Custom Cab (sold, so long old friend it was a fun ride) 68 Chevy SWB Fleetside Custom Cab 68 Camaro convertible www.louisianaclassictruckclub.com

03-19-2004, 11:33 AM	#9
ronh72c10 Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Mount Forest, Ontario, Canada Posts: 978	I suppose you could chop up a set of http://www.usbody.com fiberglass bedsides (or maybe their stepside fenders) it would be really expensive though. Ron __________________ 72 Chevy C10 (rust repaired, starting body work) 72 GMC 3/4ton 4x4 72 Chevy C20 Suburban 38 Ford Tudor Humpback Sedan (from the darkside) 67 Pontiac Parisienne 55 Studebaker Commander 2dr Hardtop (Starliner) My Youtube channel with Video Updates!

03-19-2004, 11:50 AM	#10
Russell Professional Grade Join Date: May 2003 Location: Fort McMurray, Alberta Posts: 7,915	Were all late model stepsides fiberglass? The bedsides on our 92 were steel... __________________ 1995 Chevrolet 2 Door Tahoe (6.6L LBZ Duramax / ZF6 / NP241 with 1 ton solid axle swap)

03-19-2004, 01:10 PM	#12
Stingray42 Woot. Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Stouffville, Ontario Posts: 2,291	lmao.... I forgot that the late model beds were fiberglass.... guess that screws things up pretty good.... I'll have to think on that one....lol __________________ Clarkson 96 Chevy RCLB 4.3 2WD

03-19-2004, 07:36 PM	#13
stepside71 Project Money Pit Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Pensacola Florida Posts: 90	IMO the bed SHOULD match the rest of the truck ! __________________ For sale: GMC rad support $50, L/F 69-72 fender $50, (1) 69-72 & 67-68 Chevy hood $50 ea.,1 disc brake spindles w/ calipers and rotors $ 25 WTB: (1) R/F inner fender. OR will trade

03-20-2004, 08:39 AM	#14
boozel67 FORSALE Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: central pa Posts: 95	i have one on my '67 # 1 reason it s there FREEBEE. i am saving for a us body bed. then the problem is trying to matsh paint stupid me tossed out every thing about the paint. Attached Images __________________ 1967 chevy 1/2 ton short step

03-20-2004, 10:13 AM	#15
Blue Beard Registered User Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Washington State Posts: 8,834	How about someone doing a photoshop of this idea...? __________________ 1970 Chev CST 2003 Harley Fatboy 1975 Chevrolet Step Van 1956 Chev Bel Air 1977 Blazer 2WD For Sale $3000.00 1978 Blazer 2WD For Sale $7000.00 1978 Silverado 2005 Monte Carlo



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.