The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-26-2005, 05:29 PM   #1
crossy
Oh,you can't buy that new
 
crossy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsville,N.J. 08070, USA
Posts: 2,039
Lower control arms , tubular . anyone make them? Double hump Crossmembers??

It appears that no one(company) is listing tubular control arms for our trucks anymore???? is that right? all I can find is the ones for air bags now. I want standard or lowering type. thanx for ANY help .

Is the guy from the forum still making the double hump cross members or does anyone have one. Did they work out ? DAVE
__________________
"been there, done that, ruined the T-shirt".
2007 LBZ GMC Sierra, ECSB
2006 LM7 RCSB Silverado
98 Vortec project.
94,3500,6.5L 4L80
81 SWB GMC POS finally gone
73 Pinto, stock, w/CragarSS's-eww
LOTS of Cummins trucks.
crossy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 06:00 PM   #2
Captkaos
www.73-87chevytrucks.com
 
Captkaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,935
Dave, DJM makes upper and lower control arms.
http://www.djmsuspension.com/Product...y/C10Parts.htm

I don't think anyone is making the double hump tranny crossmembers, but it is on my list.
__________________
Chris Lucas
1973 Chevy C-10
1978 GMC Jimmy (2WD) - SOLD
1987 R10 twin turbo LS
1991 R3500 SRW CrewCab
1985 K5 diesel swapped project
1989 K5 2WD conversion w/ Vette susp Project
Captkaos Customs
73-87chevytrucks.com
Captkaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 06:25 PM   #3
1FaastC10
Account Suspended
 
1FaastC10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 6,400
i dont think he ever came trough with any double humps. i could be wrong though.
1FaastC10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 06:48 PM   #4
r0lf-
Hotwheels?
 
r0lf-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Pleasant Hill, CA
Posts: 1,145
Ok, dont mind my stupidity. Whats the advantages of Tubular Control arms other than weight? Strength?
__________________
1978 Money Pit - CUSTOM DELUXE!!!!
r0lf- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 08:16 PM   #5
gchemist
BAD BOW-Silverado XST
 
gchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Senior Member from Austin, TX
Posts: 6,431
Tubular arms won't take the beating if you hit something on the road. Then you have to buy two again too.

I have one of the custom made double hump crossmembers. I have yet to install it. Have big plans for the summer though.

gchemist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 08:58 PM   #6
SanitysBane
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 2,121
I will be making a doulbe hump cross memeber this summer.
__________________
'96 Nissan Pathfinder
'02 Firebird Trans Am.
'88 K5 Blazer
SanitysBane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 11:11 PM   #7
1FaastC10
Account Suspended
 
1FaastC10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 6,400
Quote:
Originally Posted by gchemist
Tubular arms won't take the beating if you hit something on the road. Then you have to buy two again too.
on the contrary, a tubular arm will take more of a beating than a stamped arm.
1FaastC10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 11:15 PM   #8
crossy
Oh,you can't buy that new
 
crossy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsville,N.J. 08070, USA
Posts: 2,039
Quote:
Originally Posted by r0lf-
Ok, dont mind my stupidity. Whats the advantages of Tubular Control arms other than weight? Strength?
answered your own question as far as I' m concerned, ans correctly I might add, so whom ever told you that you are stupid- is stupiderrr.

ALSO with a lowered control arm Only the coil spring saddle sits down close to the road. NOT the whole A-arm. my truck currently has drop springs & spindles and is too damn low for me. Since I PLAN to race & drive the truck the weight MAY come into play. I'll have to see what they cost first. I bought a set years ago and we couldn't even get the the poly bushings to fit into them right. I need new lowers and I ran a WTB ad here on the forums but no one answered my call. local boneyard wants $50ea. -screw them! I've scrapped 6-7 good sets before but now that i want some ---- I may just redo a set of stockers. not sure yet. at least I got this friggin thing running anyway.
Don't let the wind out of my sails yet I just got the ship off the sandbar where it has been sitting for a year to me. DAVE
__________________
"been there, done that, ruined the T-shirt".
2007 LBZ GMC Sierra, ECSB
2006 LM7 RCSB Silverado
98 Vortec project.
94,3500,6.5L 4L80
81 SWB GMC POS finally gone
73 Pinto, stock, w/CragarSS's-eww
LOTS of Cummins trucks.
crossy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2005, 11:25 PM   #9
crossy
Oh,you can't buy that new
 
crossy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsville,N.J. 08070, USA
Posts: 2,039
Jeremy , I'm a little up in the air on that statement and don't want to argue either way but I can say that i don't think the tubular arm itself would half of beating the previous owner(Mr.A-hole as I like to call him) of my truck put the lower A arms through. Now thats talking frontal impact. Tubular A arms in general are VERY strong by design because of the triangulation and round tubing.

Hey Chris I Emailed you with a question but do not know if I have your current email addy so drop me at a line at my good ,old ,slow all4trux@snip.net if you don't get something from me today , thanx , DAVE
__________________
"been there, done that, ruined the T-shirt".
2007 LBZ GMC Sierra, ECSB
2006 LM7 RCSB Silverado
98 Vortec project.
94,3500,6.5L 4L80
81 SWB GMC POS finally gone
73 Pinto, stock, w/CragarSS's-eww
LOTS of Cummins trucks.
crossy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2005, 01:29 AM   #10
1FaastC10
Account Suspended
 
1FaastC10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 6,400
Dave, i can see your point. i completely forgot about the spring bucket being lowered and exposed the way they are. seems kind of stupid to do it that way, just run a shorter spring and be done with it, instead they leave the spring bucket exposed and vulnerable. the last few sets of tubular LCAs i've seen were hand built, and were specifically built for light weight and improved strength, they didnt lower the vehicle at all.
1FaastC10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2005, 01:56 PM   #11
86-C10-V6
Shadetree Mechanic
 
86-C10-V6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Youngsville, NC
Posts: 100
Me Too

I was looking for Tubular A arms because I thought they were supposed to be stronger than the OEM stamped versions.
I have had no luck in finding any that were made for standard height, I don't want to lower or raise my truck, I just want a stronger A arm that doesn't bend so easily when I slide in that logging road ditch.
If anyone has a source please post it, the link listed above has only 3" drop parts.
Thanks
__________________
Dave M. (Hacksaw)
86 C10 Scottsdale LWB, 4.3L, Edelbrock 1904, K&N, 700R4, 3.08 Auburn Performance
89 GMC S-15 Extended Cab 4x4, 4.3L, FI
98 K1500 Xcab, 5.7L, 3.43 Gov-Lok
86-C10-V6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2005, 03:39 PM   #12
Slonaker
Insert Witty Text Here
 
Slonaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,415
Quote:
Originally Posted by 86-C10-V6
I was looking for Tubular A arms because I thought they were supposed to be stronger than the OEM stamped versions.
I have had no luck in finding any that were made for standard height, I don't want to lower or raise my truck, I just want a stronger A arm that doesn't bend so easily when I slide in that logging road ditch.
If anyone has a source please post it, the link listed above has only 3" drop parts.
Thanks
Could you just box and gusset a set of stock control arms to make them stronger?

Slonaker
__________________
'86 Chevy C10 (Sold 04/19/13 )
Stock '01 Silverado
Slonaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2005, 05:41 PM   #13
crossy
Oh,you can't buy that new
 
crossy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Pennsville,N.J. 08070, USA
Posts: 2,039
slonaker ,you beat me to that answer :-( , and any guy nick-named HACKSAW ought to be able to pull that off. I can't imagine anything short of tank parts that would be stronger than the stock ones if they hade a sort of flat skid plate welded across the bottoms , allow room for shocks though :-) .
maybe NOT drinking/driving on logging roads is a quicker answer. juskiddin

DAVE
__________________
"been there, done that, ruined the T-shirt".
2007 LBZ GMC Sierra, ECSB
2006 LM7 RCSB Silverado
98 Vortec project.
94,3500,6.5L 4L80
81 SWB GMC POS finally gone
73 Pinto, stock, w/CragarSS's-eww
LOTS of Cummins trucks.
crossy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2005, 06:45 PM   #14
Captkaos
www.73-87chevytrucks.com
 
Captkaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,935
Quote:
Originally Posted by crossy
Hey Chris I Emailed you with a question but do not know if I have your current email addy so drop me at a line at my good ,old ,slow all4trux@snip.net if you don't get something from me today , thanx , DAVE
I got it last night and sent you a reply. Check your email in a sec...
__________________
Chris Lucas
1973 Chevy C-10
1978 GMC Jimmy (2WD) - SOLD
1987 R10 twin turbo LS
1991 R3500 SRW CrewCab
1985 K5 diesel swapped project
1989 K5 2WD conversion w/ Vette susp Project
Captkaos Customs
73-87chevytrucks.com
Captkaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:27 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com