The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-09-2006, 06:06 PM   #1
WORNBRAKES
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Hughesville, MD
Posts: 1,350
2brl vs 4brl

I am in debate with a friend on which is more efficient. So I will raise the question here.
Is a 2brl more efficient than a 4brl and why?
Thanks in advance.
__________________
Mario and Mandy
Hughesville, MD 20637

69 C10 305/350
71 K5 Basket case
75 K10 Rescue **Parting out**
77 MG Midget **Parting out**
15 6.7L Cummins
WORNBRAKES is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2006, 06:14 PM   #2
jhow66
Registered User
 
jhow66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Knoxville Tenn.
Posts: 3,058
Re: 2brl vs 4brl

No. Why is what you mean by efficent? (mileage or power).
__________________
56 Chevy Bel-Air 2dr. HT (purchased new)
71 Chevy Cheyenne SWB PU (502HO)
65 GMC short bed step--work in progress and my gofer
jhow66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2006, 06:43 PM   #3
shelby987
Registered User
 
shelby987's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Just outside Durham, NC
Posts: 894
Re: 2brl vs 4brl

With gas at over $3/gallon on regular, I am gonna guess you mean fuel economy wise. All I know is that a 4bbl (non double pumper) will have a set of primaries and a set of secondaries, obviously the primaries are smaller than the secondaries, as the primaries main function is to keep your truck running when in situations where partial throttle is required (cruising on the highway for example). The secondaries should only come on at either a throttle position (mechanical) or a given engine load (vaccum actuated secondaries). This is not the case on a 2bbl carb, your two bbl's are at some stage of open all the time, so the amount of fuel being pulled into the engine is only determined by the amount of those two throttle blades opening, and not having a seperate set of throttle blades closed all together.

I would say if you were to compare 2 carbs of equal cfm ratings, like a 2bbl 500 cfm to a 4bbl 500 cfm, you would likely end up with better mpg with the 4bbl. That being said, a 4bbl will let you suck down a lot more fuel if you don't keep your foot out of it, as with all things, driving style will likely play a bigger role in economy than the carb selection.

I haven't had much experience with 2bbl carbs though, its either 1bbl or 4 thus far!
shelby987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2006, 07:20 PM   #4
JameslovesJammie
God Bless Mr. T
 
JameslovesJammie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Minot, ND
Posts: 348
Re: 2brl vs 4brl

My grandfather was shop forman at Chevy garage in the late 60's, early 70's and knows how to tune a carb. He has a 1972 K/10 with a 350/350 combo. He originally had a 4 barrel quadrajet on it, but took it off and put a 2 barrel on it for "increased fuel economy."

I don't know what 2 barrel he put on, but his gas mileage didn't get better. He actually lost about 2 miles per gallon and his truck doesn't tow as well.

A properly tuned Quadrajet is about the next best thing to fuel injection as far as efficiency. The small primaries are great for fuel economy, while the HUGE secondaries are awesome for towing and hard acceleration.
__________________
Like a midget at a urinal...sometimes you must stay on your toes.
JameslovesJammie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2006, 07:37 PM   #5
Robert1970C20rstbukt
Registered User
 
Robert1970C20rstbukt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Beeville, Texas
Posts: 1,943
Re: 2brl vs 4brl

A Quadrajet will get better mileage than a 2bbl, since the Qjet primaries on it are smaller than the 2bbl's main's as long as you don't stand on it a lot.
__________________
RJD

1984 Chevrolet C30 welding truck 454/SM465
1977 GMC C15 pickup 350/TH350
1970 Chevrolet C20 pickup 350/TH400
1970 Chevrolet K20 Suburban 454/TH350
1969 GMC 8500 478M V6/5 spd winch truck
Robert1970C20rstbukt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2006, 11:04 PM   #6
jhow66
Registered User
 
jhow66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Knoxville Tenn.
Posts: 3,058
Re: 2brl vs 4brl

Check, check and check.
__________________
56 Chevy Bel-Air 2dr. HT (purchased new)
71 Chevy Cheyenne SWB PU (502HO)
65 GMC short bed step--work in progress and my gofer
jhow66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 11:23 AM   #7
farside847
Registered User
 
farside847's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 995
Re: 2brl vs 4brl

has anyone ever gone from a 2brl to a 4brl and noticed a real increase?
__________________
1971 Chevy C10 Shortbed Stepside, 307v8 3-on-the-tree
farside847 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 01:50 PM   #8
shelby987
Registered User
 
shelby987's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Just outside Durham, NC
Posts: 894
Re: 2brl vs 4brl

1bbl to 4bbl netted me a 2-3mpg increase, I would be a 1-2mpg increase wouldn't be too much of a stretch.
__________________
1969 SS 350 Camaro Sold 2008
1970 3/4T K20, stock height with 33's, 250 I6, 3 on the tree, and locked front and rear 4.10's
1980 Chevy Malibu 2 dr Sold 2007
1993 Olds. Cutlass Ciera Wagon Traded 2006
2003 Saturn L200 w/5pd. D/D
My list spans 5 decades with One common thread.....GM!
shelby987 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 01:59 PM   #9
Huck
Senior Member
 
Huck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Shelbyville, KY
Posts: 3,261
Re: 2brl vs 4brl

All of the above--my experience is running on the 4brl primaries is more efficient then on a 2brl. Also, running a stock intake is more efficient then any aftermarket intake. In addition, running stock exhaust manifolds has also been more fuel efficient then headers. I have tried several variations and it seems stock is more fuel efficient with the exception of ignition--HEI is better. Not only fuel efficient but my low end torque is best --stock.
Huck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 02:23 PM   #10
bryanw1968
Senior Member
 
bryanw1968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Leander, Texas
Posts: 850
Re: 2brl vs 4brl

My .2 cents.....

I have done a LOT of carb tuning and installation on SBC's.
I agree with what most of the others said. A 4bbl will be a better choice.
Now, that being said, the biggest mistake that people make is over carburetoring. Chevy's escpecially don't like it. Consider the weight of the vehicle and how quick you need to move air through the motor. The heavier the vehicle, the faster you want to move the air to create torque. I'd either recommend a 650 Edelbrock or a Quadrajet at the same CFM or smaller coupled with a dual plane intake manifold. Some of the intakes are cut with a spread bore and some with a square bore. Go with the square bore if you don't have a high performance application.

Click here to see an example of the intake.

http://public.fotki.com/bryanw1968/73_spread_bore_corv/
bryanw1968 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2006, 04:04 PM   #11
davidh
Senior Member
 
davidh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ponca city now kingfisher Oklahoma
Posts: 1,220
Re: 2brl vs 4brl

I thought of doing this with a 283, 305 heads from 80's. mild cam rv or smaller then I have a 80's 305HO factory aluminum intake, topped off with a fresh quadrajet and keeping a manual tranny. I was going to run ram horns and maybe single exhaust through a 3" pipe too to keep some back pressure.
davidh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2006, 06:59 AM   #12
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
Re: 2brl vs 4brl

I built a 307 and put a Holley 450 CFM economaster on a stock 4bbl manifold and got a big increase in economy AND when I put the pedal down,more power.The spread-bore 4bbl is a very fuel efficient design for "best of both worlds" performance.The motor also had 1.94" heads and an RV-type cam.It outran stock 350s but got better mileage.(headers and HEI,too)
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2006, 08:04 AM   #13
68C15
blood type; Retumbo
 
68C15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: next to my reloading bench
Posts: 10,269
Re: 2brl vs 4brl

Quote:
Originally Posted by farside847
has anyone ever gone from a 2brl to a 4brl and noticed a real increase?
not likely. the driver usually ends up using all 4 barrels.
68C15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2006, 06:02 PM   #14
farside847
Registered User
 
farside847's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 995
Re: 2brl vs 4brl

Quote:
Originally Posted by special-K
I built a 307 and put a Holley 450 CFM economaster on a stock 4bbl manifold and got a big increase in economy AND when I put the pedal down,more power.The spread-bore 4bbl is a very fuel efficient design for "best of both worlds" performance.The motor also had 1.94" heads and an RV-type cam.It outran stock 350s but got better mileage.(headers and HEI,too)
Cool, that sounds similar to my set up. Do you remember what MPG you got?
__________________
1971 Chevy C10 Shortbed Stepside, 307v8 3-on-the-tree
farside847 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2006, 07:04 PM   #15
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,690
Re: 2brl vs 4brl

Quote:
Originally Posted by davidh
I thought of doing this with a 283, 305 heads from 80's. mild cam rv or smaller then I have a 80's 305HO factory aluminum intake, topped off with a fresh quadrajet and keeping a manual tranny. I was going to run ram horns and maybe single exhaust through a 3" pipe too to keep some back pressure.
Dave, if the budget allows, go with daul pipes. you could go with a 2 or 2 1/4, since you aren't looking for real performance here.
There is no reason to WANT pack pressure onless you have a turbo.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2006, 10:21 PM   #16
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
Re: 2brl vs 4brl

Quote:
Originally Posted by farside847
Cool, that sounds similar to my set up. Do you remember what MPG you got?
Ok,here`s the scoop...It was a K/20 with 4.57 rears,14.50/37 tires,and a 4spd manual and I got 12-15 mpg on the hiway.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2006, 01:22 PM   #17
davidh
Senior Member
 
davidh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Ponca city now kingfisher Oklahoma
Posts: 1,220
Re: 2brl vs 4brl

Quote:
Originally Posted by special-K
I built a 307 and put a Holley 450 CFM economaster on a stock 4bbl manifold and got a big increase in economy AND when I put the pedal down,more power.The spread-bore 4bbl is a very fuel efficient design for "best of both worlds" performance.The motor also had 1.94" heads and an RV-type cam.It outran stock 350s but got better mileage.(headers and HEI,too)

Isn't that 450 carb discontinued? I was looking at summit and jegs and didn't see it. Maybe it's just not listed. I did see a 390 4bbl holley that would probably be good on a 283, 305, 307 if it was a mild motor they had a chokeless 450 cfm but I don't know how I'd like that on cold Oklahoma morning or day.
A few years ago I had 83 C10, rebuilt 350, Oreily rebuilt Quadrajet. RV engle cam, duals, Older nonantispark HEI, mild curve kit, 3.08 gears, Going 60-65mph with an unloaded car trailer got 15mpg by checking the mileage by mile marker, not spedo. It was in FLAT Kansas too.
davidh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-12-2006, 02:49 PM   #18
WORNBRAKES
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Hughesville, MD
Posts: 1,350
Re: 2brl vs 4brl

Thanks. I won the debate and you all are having fun with the thread.
__________________
Mario and Mandy
Hughesville, MD 20637

69 C10 305/350
71 K5 Basket case
75 K10 Rescue **Parting out**
77 MG Midget **Parting out**
15 6.7L Cummins
WORNBRAKES is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com