Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-21-2006, 09:43 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 66
|
Lockup converter or not?
My 84 K10 came with a 700R4 in it, and now that I will be doing a TPI swap, I need to know if it is a lockup converter or not. I really don't have a clue what a lockup does, if I need it, or if I have it. All my project vehicles to date have either beed TH350's or 4 speeds. When I get my custom harness, one of the options is for the lockup converter, and I just don't know what to order. Now my truck has had all the factory computer stuff and emissions removed by the PO, and there are a few wires coming from the trans that were cut. Truck runs and shifts fine though as it is. Any info would be great. Thanks.
Terry
__________________
84 K10, 350 Auto 72 Chevelle, 454 4spd. 78 Trans Am 400 4spd 88 GTA 350 Auto 94 Cherokee |
11-21-2006, 11:32 AM | #2 |
7000 #'s of american IRON
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: north tx
Posts: 883
|
Re: Lockup converter or not?
I'd like to think it's lockup..i'm yet to see a non-lockup 700.
|
11-21-2006, 12:05 PM | #3 |
Insert Witty Text Here
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,415
|
Re: Lockup converter or not?
A regular torque converter has some slippage all the time. This is why you can stop in drive and the engine does not die like it would with a stickshift. A lockup torque converter stops slipping once you get up to speed. That allows your engine to turn fewer rpm, which bumps gas mileage up a little. That is probably oversimplified a little, but it should give you the idea...
AFAIK, 700R4s were all lockup from the factory. I think you can have one custom built without lockup, but any stock one would have it. Hopefully someone with more knowledge will chime in... Slonaker |
11-21-2006, 08:54 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 106
|
Re: Lockup converter or not?
Great explanation of a lock up converter!!!!!
|
11-21-2006, 10:40 PM | #5 |
Sb 400 club
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NH / MA
Posts: 2,746
|
Re: Lockup converter or not?
yeah great job simply explaning a lock up! if it is stock 700r4 then it is deffinatly a lock up.
__________________
1984 chevy c10, built 400sb,.(SOLD) 77 K10 Project / daily driver "The Grinch" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=318363 1956 Willys Wagon (327 chevy) Project (Now Buick 225) 1980 Corvette L-48 4 speed 1992 Mustang GT built 5.0 5 speed 1985 C10 LWB Sold 1982 K10 SWB plow truck Parted out 1986 D30 M1028 fire brush truck Parted out |
11-22-2006, 12:59 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 66
|
Re: Lockup converter or not?
Makes alot more sense now, thanks for the info. I guess I'll ask for the lockup connections as well then.
__________________
84 K10, 350 Auto 72 Chevelle, 454 4spd. 78 Trans Am 400 4spd 88 GTA 350 Auto 94 Cherokee |
11-22-2006, 05:33 PM | #7 |
Parts and more parts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lebo, Kansas (middle of nowhere
Posts: 6,821
|
Re: Lockup converter or not?
A 700 R4 is a lock-up convertor style tranny. They CAN be changed over to a NON lock-up convertor, if that is what you need or desire. My 84 has a 700 R4 with the overdrive operational, but the lockup has been sacrificed for a 2400 stall convertor, so that my cam doesn't choke me down at a stop light. The change over to a TPI motor will probably be easier than you think. Your odds are in your favor that the motor and computer came from an automatic vehicle and that it was an overdrive tranny. If that is the case the wiring harness and computer should be ready for it. If not there are ways to set up a 700R4 for actuation without a computer to drive it. If you open Street and Performance's website, www.hotrodlane.cc they have a picture/info section that has the necessary steps to get a tranny to operate without a computer.
|
11-22-2006, 06:44 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 66
|
Re: Lockup converter or not?
Since I will be using a GM computer, I guess I'll just leave it as lockup. This will just be for haulin and wheelin, so a nice torque cam is all I'm after, so should be able to keep the stock converter. At I finally learned what a lockup is Thanks for the info.
Terry
__________________
84 K10, 350 Auto 72 Chevelle, 454 4spd. 78 Trans Am 400 4spd 88 GTA 350 Auto 94 Cherokee |
11-22-2006, 09:13 PM | #9 |
Parts and more parts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lebo, Kansas (middle of nowhere
Posts: 6,821
|
Re: Lockup converter or not?
What cam are you considering with theTPI unit? I am told that the GM TPIs are not easy to get the right performance out of with a torquey cam. The one that I am putting together for my 91 Silverado, still has the Vette roller cam in it, but I changed the heads to Vortec units with Comp Cams 1.6 roller rocker arms. Along with the upgrade on my injectors and the larger runners, I am hoping for a good solid 350+ HP.
|
11-22-2006, 10:49 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 66
|
Re: Lockup converter or not?
I dont have a number just yet, but the cam should be similar to the ZZ4 hot cam specs, which is about the biggest one you can run using a stock GM computer and not have to burn a new prom. There is also a Summit cam that would work well for me. The stock TPI unit is actually a great torque setup as it is with the stock long runners. I know my GTA has torque like mad, but gives up around 4800 because of the long runners, which is a pretty good setup for wheelin. Now if you want one that's fast with lots of HP, then the stock runners are useless. The motor in my truck now scoots pretty good, but I want the reliability and hopefully mileage from injection. Eventually I may build a 383 with TPI and get a prominator so I can tune it accordingly.
__________________
84 K10, 350 Auto 72 Chevelle, 454 4spd. 78 Trans Am 400 4spd 88 GTA 350 Auto 94 Cherokee |
11-23-2006, 02:05 AM | #11 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Georgia
Posts: 614
|
Re: Lockup converter or not?
Quote:
__________________
2012 Silverado LT 1500, 5.3, 6 speed auto '86 SWB C-10 Silverado |
|
11-23-2006, 03:05 AM | #12 |
7000 #'s of american IRON
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: north tx
Posts: 883
|
Re: Lockup converter or not?
there is indeed a computer. It's location changes, but it's there somewhere, i think the more common place was near the fuse block and behind the radio i think???????
|
11-23-2006, 11:37 AM | #13 |
Parts and more parts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lebo, Kansas (middle of nowhere
Posts: 6,821
|
Re: Lockup converter or not?
Take a look behind the glove box (on top of the heater. The computer is there. The wiring goes through the firewall just above and behind the motor. The lock up portion of a convertor can be bypassed and it be used as a standard tranny, just by unplugging it. That is not the right way to do it, though. My truck (84 GMC) and my son's truck (86 silverado) both came with the 350C trannies (350 with a lockup convertor) and we removed them for the overdrive trannies. The best thing that I ever did. I purchased the trannies from what used to Premier Performance (now known as JET Performance trannies) and they came without the lockup feature. Since that purchase we have had the trannies built up to a stronger combination tha what JET supplies. The smog stuff is unecessary for a lockup to work. I had my smog stuff gone long before I changed out my 350C tranny. You need to look at a power source that is triggered off of a speed or tranny pressure to set the lockup around 45 MPH and keep it applied until you get below that speed. As I stated above, go to Speed and Performance's website and open their page http://www.hotrodlane.cc/ONLINETECH/translockup.html to see that the lockup can be connected up for use anywhere.
The TPI is a good idea, the top end can be moved by getting rid of the heads that comes with the original setup. The Scoggin Dickey Vortec conversion will allow for the power curve to move up another 1000 RPMs and give you another 100 to 125 HP in the boot. There was an article in Chevy High Performance on this install and the review was good. Just don't loose that vacuum signal that the TPI needs for it's operation, the cam is the important part of this. Last edited by piecesparts; 11-23-2006 at 11:37 AM. |
11-23-2006, 01:04 PM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 66
|
Re: Lockup converter or not?
No doubt the Vortec heads are the way to go. The downside is you need the Vortec TPI base which is like $300. I have one of the Accel Superram bases on my GTA which can be used on Vortec or standard L98 heads, and if I could find another one used at a decent price, I would definately use the Vortecs on my truck.
__________________
84 K10, 350 Auto 72 Chevelle, 454 4spd. 78 Trans Am 400 4spd 88 GTA 350 Auto 94 Cherokee |
11-23-2006, 03:41 PM | #15 | |
7000 #'s of american IRON
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: north tx
Posts: 883
|
Re: Lockup converter or not?
Quote:
|
|
11-25-2006, 04:32 AM | #16 | |
Insert Witty Text Here
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 3,415
|
Re: Lockup converter or not?
Quote:
Slonaker |
|
11-25-2006, 04:55 AM | #17 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Kansas
Posts: 865
|
Re: Lockup converter or not?
My Dad has an 85 c10 305 and it DOES have a ecm. (It is useless on his cause it was changed to the old hei) The ECM is on the passenger side right by the heater like Magnethead said. I won't be foolish enough to say all of the 85's have them but I would look and see if yours does.
|
11-25-2006, 05:45 AM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Moore OK 73160
Posts: 974
|
Re: Lockup converter or not?
my 86 has the electronic spark controller. although it's not technically an ecm it does somewhat control the spark advance for ping. i think only the 305 trucks had the esc module. it's behind the glove box just above the heater box. 82-86 700r4's run better if you run the lock up feature. they burn up the 3/4 clutch pack if you don't. if you want to run lock up with out a computer, look at the trucks that had the 350c. you can get all the parts to run a lock up tranny from them. my truck has the 350c. it's not a bad tranny but it's not a 700 which will go in sometime soon.
__________________
04 GMC Sierra RCSS 70 CST LWB 04 HD Sportster 1200 Custom |
11-25-2006, 08:31 AM | #19 |
Parts and more parts
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lebo, Kansas (middle of nowhere
Posts: 6,821
|
Re: Lockup converter or not?
You can call it what you want---The dang thing is behind the glove box and is tied to the stupid distributor and it is absolutely worthless. Get the HEI and throw the computer thingy away. The tranny is tied to the TCC valve on the intake for switching.
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|