Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-23-2008, 10:46 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Grandview WV
Posts: 41
|
front shock relocators?
I have drop spindles and new drop shocks for the spindles, I am now installing air bags and have made a set of shock relocators that give an extra three incnes, will this work or should it be different? Is there a standard measurement needed for shock travel with bags. Thanks, Greg
|
03-23-2008, 11:30 PM | #2 |
just can't cover up my redneck
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
|
Re: front shock relocators?
You shouldn't need drop shocks because of spindles. Spindles do not effect the position of the control arms, only the mounting point of the wheels in relation to the rest of the truck.
As far as "shock travel", you need to be sure that it does not limit the travel of the control arms. The bump-stops should be limiting up and down travel, the shock should have at least the same travel. |
03-24-2008, 12:16 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Grandview WV
Posts: 41
|
Re: front shock relocators?
What about air bags? They sell shock relocators for the front and rear, trying to save a few bucks by making my own.
|
03-24-2008, 12:36 AM | #4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
|
Re: front shock relocators?
Quote:
Set your truck up @ ride height % measure the distance between the upper & lower shock mount holes. Repeat the process for the fully deflated & extended heights (be sure to write your measurements down). Now take measurements of your shocks: fully extended & compressed (divide these measurements by 2 to get your middle shock-stroke length). Compare the required shock length @ 'ride height' vs the middle shock-stroke measurement. Compare the extended & compressed measurements too. Let us know what your numbers are.....
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
03-24-2008, 01:06 AM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Grandview WV
Posts: 41
|
Re: front shock relocators?
Thanks Scoti, that is what I was thinking, I dont have my front bags on and the back ones are not plumbed yet. Might have been getting ahead of myself but I was thinking about grinding and welding with the bags off. I can do the same with them on, just keep the sparks away. Greg:
|
03-24-2008, 03:00 AM | #6 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
|
Re: front shock relocators?
Quote:
I tried to plan/work ahead when I built mine & it's bit me in the arse twice now. First time was because I used the ART specials (Monroes ) for my measurements assuming the actual shocks I planned to use were the same dimensions (since they were both front replacement shocks for 68 C-10's). Once I got the new shocks on (Bilsteins) I found out they actually had 1.5" more compressed height which altered the distance for middle shock stroke @ ride height. I remade the mounts 1" taller & they were correct . . .... then I swapped to a Dropmember. Now I get to re-make the uppers again
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
03-24-2008, 03:47 AM | #7 |
A guy with a truck
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Germany, for now
Posts: 5,921
|
Re: front shock relocators?
You should have gotten a set w/ your crossmember...
__________________
-Chris Instagram _elgringoloco_ '70 Short-Wide How to: Ruin a perfectly good C10 ‘70 Blazer ConversionHow To: Ruin a Perfectly Good 4wd '72 Highlander How To: Ruin a Perfectly Good K/5 (SOLD) '72 Blazer 2WD How to: Ruin a perfectly good Blazer (SOLD) '05 Yukon Daily Driven (not so stock) Yukon (SOLD) ‘07 Yukon Denali (daily) Members met list: SCOTI, darkhorse970, 67cheby, 67cheby'sGirl, klmore, porterbuilt, n2billet, Fastrucken, classicchev, Col Clank, GSFMECH, HuggerCST, Spray-Bomb, BACKYARD88, 5150, fine69, fatbass, smbrouss70, 65StreetCruiser, GAc10boy |
03-24-2008, 04:12 AM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
|
Re: front shock relocators?
Yes I did, but they're for the 'new' style ART shocks w/the upper stud & I'm using Bilsteins which require a different upper mount.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|