The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-05-2010, 05:32 PM   #1
3r!c84
Badass
 
3r!c84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: lox. fl
Posts: 4,586
death trap

hey in automotive in school today we where all talking about theses years of gm trucks and having problems in side collisions with the gas tank on the outside of the frame rails. that it will catch on fire.and that gm was buying the trucks back(well kinda they where only giving 1000$ or somthing low ball like that)

can any one explane more
__________________
Think outside the box?
-84c10 (1stcar)→My Build
-00 Saturn 5spd

drop a gear and disappear!

1/4:13:90
3r!c84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 05:43 PM   #2
68Timber
I know the pieces fit
 
68Timber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MONTGOMERY, AL
Posts: 5,523
Re: death trap

It was a hoax. Was it NBC? - I don't recall for sure but seems like maybe it was Dateline NBC that did a story and staged a side-impact collision but used model rocket engines to ignite the tanks. It made for good footage until it was exposed. There were some actual fires, though. But it wasn't the what it was hyped to be.
__________________
John

79 2wd Blazer (Bruiser)
85 M1009 Blazer (Sarge) build
74 Honda Z50 build
68Timber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 05:49 PM   #3
68Timber
I know the pieces fit
 
68Timber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MONTGOMERY, AL
Posts: 5,523
Re: death trap

Google this - gm truck fire sue nbc

Here's just one hit: http://www.time.com/time/magazine/ar...977814,00.html
__________________
John

79 2wd Blazer (Bruiser)
85 M1009 Blazer (Sarge) build
74 Honda Z50 build
68Timber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 06:09 PM   #4
chrismoore701
Registered User
 
chrismoore701's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Highland, IN
Posts: 2,326
Re: death trap

I actually received a voucherr for my truck do to the lawsuit on side impacts and fires. I can't remember what it was for, but something along the lines of $100 cash or $500 or $1000 for trade in on a new gm. I used it back in about 2005 for my new Impala. So that portion was true. It was listed as like a class action lawsuit and all owners of this style truck should have received this voucher
chrismoore701 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 06:19 PM   #5
chrismoore701
Registered User
 
chrismoore701's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Highland, IN
Posts: 2,326
Re: death trap

check this out, it goes into the class action lawsuit

http://www.lubbockonline.com/news/122896/judge.htm

Chris
chrismoore701 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 06:40 PM   #6
ToughBowtieTruck
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 111
Re: death trap

Better than the tanks sitting behind the seat in the cab.

I have heard of a guy and his girl getting T-boned in an accident that ruptured the tank. Then NBC staged an accident as said.
__________________
-Josh

"Mr. Simpson, there are thousands of people like you with no discernible talent." Duff World Records Division

"Yeah, they're called Congress!!" -Homer Simpson
ToughBowtieTruck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 07:34 PM   #7
JohnC
Registered User
 
JohnC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,461
Re: death trap

Yeah it was legit, but not as bad as the news story made it out to be. I also received a coupon as part of the class action lawsuit. Of course back then I couldn't afford a new GM product so in the trash it went.
JohnC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 07:46 PM   #8
Keith Seymore
Registered User
 
Keith Seymore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 9,226
Re: death trap

I was working on these truck back then, as was my Dad. He made these tanks up at Chevrolet Flint Manufacturing, and took this whole "staged fire" thing pretty personally...

One of the things they used to do to demonstrate the integrity of the welds on the tank was to fill it with water and then throw it off the roof of the building (lol).

As for me, I was pretty doggone proud of Harry Pearce for sticking up for us and sticking it back to NBC. Our investigators actually found the small rocket engine (ignitors) in the junkyard with the burned up trucks. That's when it hit the fan.

From an engineering perspective, one problem with this whole litigous philosophy is that it leaves no room for "continuous improvement". As was mentioned, the previous generation truck gas tank was in the cab, behind the seat. Moving the tank to the frame rail intuitively would seem to be a big step in the right direction. But - according to the lawyers - any time you make a change you are implying "culpability" (ie, you are implying that there was a problem with the previous design). That's not necessarily the case. There are hundreds of non-safety related reasons for changing something, including availability of packaging space, commonization with other products or model types, cost, timing, material availability, advancement of new technology, elimination of archaic technology, etc.

Also - the number of Federally mandated tests and requirements that we must meet is staggering. We have whole staffs of people that crash things, burn things, and generally run them into the ground to insure that we comply with Federal safety and emission requirements. We can't (...not "won't" - but CAN'T...) sell a vehicle until we've passed all those tests. We can design a legally safe vehicle, and a safe vehicle from a practical standpoint, but we can't protect against rocket ignitors in the gas tank or people plowing at a high rate of speed into the back of a vehicle stopped at a toll booth.

I which you all could see how much time and money we spend (..."waste?") discussing the fact that this radius is .2mm and it is legally required to be .25mm, or that this "head impact number" is some increment above a legal requirement. It is hours and hours everyday. To suggest that we blithely design product and numbly pass them off to customers with known defects (...as some have suggested in the past...) shows a total lack of understanding and regard of the auto industry as a whole.

This single item (Federally required testing) is probably the biggest reason why it takes so long to design and release a new product into the market today.

My $.03 -

K
__________________
Chevrolet Flint Assembly
1979-1986
GM Full Size Truck Engineering
1986 - 2019
Intro from an Old Assembly Guy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926
My Pontiac story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524
Chevelle intro: http://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/

Last edited by Keith Seymore; 01-05-2010 at 08:00 PM.
Keith Seymore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 07:52 PM   #9
Chevy-Art
Registered User
 
Chevy-Art's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: San Antonio, Tx
Posts: 99
Re: death trap

Hoax/staged like everyone else said. Anything to get the ratings up.
__________________
1990 Chevrolet RCSB●LS1/4L60E
Scrimpin Ain't Easy
Chevy-Art is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 08:03 PM   #10
68Timber
I know the pieces fit
 
68Timber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MONTGOMERY, AL
Posts: 5,523
Re: death trap

The part of the story that was barely reported at the time was that Ford and Dodge trucks had tanks outside the frame-rails on their fullsize trucks during the 73-87 era, but not necessarily the whole time as 73-87 defines GM's run of that platform.

But I do recall the coverage at the time, NBC was dragged over the coals. The video they staged clearly showed the puff of the model rocket engines when the car that was to t-bone the truck was still a foot or two away.

Of course NBC wasn't playing those precious few staged seconds in frame by frame slow motion, but the other networks were happy to.

I do recall that one fireman on the scene to control the burn saw what they were doing with the model rocket engines and was heard to comment, "Well, there goes that theory."
__________________
John

79 2wd Blazer (Bruiser)
85 M1009 Blazer (Sarge) build
74 Honda Z50 build
68Timber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 08:25 PM   #11
tommys69/454
1969 short box
 
tommys69/454's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: waterloo,newyork
Posts: 146
Re: death trap

thats why i keep my gas tank in the cab !!!!!!! where i know it's safe. lol
__________________
tommy morehouse
tommys69/454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 08:47 PM   #12
68Timber
I know the pieces fit
 
68Timber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: MONTGOMERY, AL
Posts: 5,523
Re: death trap

Quote:
Originally Posted by tommys69/454 View Post
thats why i keep my gas tank in the cab !!!!!!! where i know it's safe. lol
I was a little dude when my grandpa had a red 67-72 long-bed, I don't know the year. Straight six and a column-shifted three-speed. I knew I heard sloshing behind the seat but was too young to know or care what it might be - just that it was all good to be hanging with Pa.
__________________
John

79 2wd Blazer (Bruiser)
85 M1009 Blazer (Sarge) build
74 Honda Z50 build
68Timber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2010, 09:46 PM   #13
old Rusty C10
Robert Olson Transport
 
old Rusty C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: recent transplant to NC USA
Posts: 20,310
Re: death trap

I was hit on the side in one of the tanks on my 86 and the only thing that it did was bend the tank and mounts... the tank never leaked, and it never worked right with the float after that but it was no problem
__________________
Bob



1951 International running on a squarebody chassis


"If a man's worth is judged by the people he associates himself with, then i am the richest man in the world knowing some of the fine people of this board"
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/a...t.php?f=25&a=9 (you can review the site rules here!)


PM Me for your vehicle/parts hauling needs in the North East US or see my Facebook page Robert Olson Transport

Live each day to the fullest.. you never know when fate is going to pull the rug out from under you...
I hate cancer!!
old Rusty C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 12:16 AM   #14
78 Chevyrado
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Unnapreciative, Trollville
Posts: 2,079
Re: death trap

GM just gave $1000 coupons towards new trucks. Basically at this point in time if your ride is older than say 2008, you're riding in a death trap...
78 Chevyrado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 12:20 AM   #15
87cdime
Registered User
 
87cdime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Norman, ok
Posts: 64
Re: death trap

Well then I guess that makes us all screwed lol!!!!
87cdime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 12:23 AM   #16
78 Chevyrado
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Unnapreciative, Trollville
Posts: 2,079
Re: death trap

Quote:
Originally Posted by 87cdime View Post
Well then I guess that makes us all screwed lol!!!!
We're screwed by a factor of 20 at least...
78 Chevyrado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 12:26 AM   #17
87cdime
Registered User
 
87cdime's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Norman, ok
Posts: 64
Re: death trap

I'll roll my death trap till the day I die!!! Lol so I say
87cdime is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 12:40 AM   #18
78 Chevyrado
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Unnapreciative, Trollville
Posts: 2,079
Re: death trap

Somehow mine kept me alive, with no damage other than scratches from the broken glass everywhere... So I'm happy with my old death trap. Though this one is heavier so the roof would be squased in farther...dang oh well I stand by my earlier comment!


78 Chevyrado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 04:03 AM   #19
gchemist
BAD BOW-Silverado XST
 
gchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Senior Member from Austin, TX
Posts: 6,431
Re: death trap

Yea, death trap to anyone you hit with a square body!! A square body will crumple cars and new trucks like a beer can.
__________________
Gerardo a.k.a. Mad Chemist
Silverado XST videos
gchemist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 04:31 AM   #20
andrewmp6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Louisville,Ky
Posts: 5,811
Re: death trap

Some people say a early mustang will fireball if its rear ended.But i have only seen one crash of a early mustang that had a fire from a busted gas tank.I rather have a big truck or a big car in a wreck.Look at a smart car they have a 5 star crash test rating but id never own one.
andrewmp6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 10:53 AM   #21
JohnC
Registered User
 
JohnC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 7,461
Re: death trap

To hit a vehicle hard enough to make an explosion really takes so many variables. Sure sometimes those variables come together, and it does happen. However, out of how many vehicles produced does it actually occur.

Keith - Thank you for your input from a GM engineers viewpoint. That is one of many great things about having you, and other GM employees as members here is that we can get insight from the other side of the table as well. Thanks again man!
JohnC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2010, 11:02 AM   #22
Keith Seymore
Registered User
 
Keith Seymore's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Motor City
Posts: 9,226
Re: death trap

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnC View Post
To hit a vehicle hard enough to make an explosion really takes so many variables. Sure sometimes those variables come together, and it does happen. However, out of how many vehicles produced does it actually occur.
Good point -

Keep in mind there were (I'm guessing) maybe 15 million of these trucks produced; to hear about a handful of fires is statistically incredibly small.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnC View Post
Keith - Thank you for your input from a GM engineers viewpoint. That is one of many great things about having you, and other GM employees as members here is that we can get insight from the other side of the table as well. Thanks again man!
Thank you -

I appreciate the input because I never really know what's going to be a "hit" or a "miss". So - I just keep swingin' away

K
__________________
Chevrolet Flint Assembly
1979-1986
GM Full Size Truck Engineering
1986 - 2019
Intro from an Old Assembly Guy: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342926
My Pontiac story: http://forums.maxperformanceinc.com/...d.php?t=560524
Chevelle intro: http://www.superchevy.com/features/s...hevy-chevelle/
Keith Seymore is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com