08-30-2011, 08:31 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Clute, TX.
Posts: 1,935
|
Hydro assist brakes
Just trying to gets halls outlook on them. I have been contemplating getting rid of the hydro assist brake for the conventional vacuum booster brakes. What do y'all think
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
2004 Silverado Crewcab 1972 Chevy Monte Carlo 2017 Chevy Tahoe |
08-30-2011, 09:41 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Hot Springs, AR.
Posts: 1,215
|
Re: Hydro assist brakes
Why would you though? Hydra-boost systems are far more powerful & efficient that vacuum set-ups are... Plus, if you plan to run a large cam with low vacuum or anything, the brakes won't get affected. Just my 2 cents worth on it.
__________________
1977 Chevrolet K30 LWB Crew Cab 497HP Mast Motorsports 6.0L LY6 HO engine GM NV4500 5-speed, Centerforce clutch + NP205 D60 + 14-bolt FF w/ Eaton posi + disc brakes Skyjacker 2.5" full spring lift w/ Nitro shocks Custom paint + interior http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=435722 |
08-30-2011, 10:21 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Grande Prairie, Alberta
Posts: 368
|
Re: Hydro assist brakes
Agreed! Takes up less space, works better, you would be stepping backward to get rid of it. There is a reason that hydro boost is a popular swap on other vehicles.
KEEP IT! |
08-30-2011, 10:24 PM | #4 | |
Getcha Pull
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 691
|
Re: Hydro assist brakes
Quote:
__________________
'81 K10 454/SM465 '86 S10 Blazer '95 H-D Softail '96 Integra |
|
08-30-2011, 10:25 PM | #5 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brookings, SD
Posts: 10,497
|
Re: Hydro assist brakes
I did the opposite, got rid of the vacuum and installed the hydro-boost. Couldn't be happier. Never in my wildest dreams would I consider investing time or money to get rid of them.
__________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't good for anything, but you can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs. |
08-30-2011, 11:37 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 970
|
Re: Hydro assist brakes
Im one that was wondering the opposite. From everyones comments i hear that going to hydroboost would be a great option.
__________________
2014 LTZ Z71 Silverado 82 C15 LQ4/4L80E Conversion 78 Suburban build (SOLD) 83 4x4 Suburban(SOLD) 82 C15 (my first truck) |
08-30-2011, 11:48 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Highwood, MT
Posts: 24
|
Re: Hydro assist brakes
We just bought an '88 with hydroboost and it stops better than my '08. Good system, why change it?
|
08-31-2011, 12:40 AM | #8 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,025
|
Re: Hydro assist brakes
Quote:
The debatable or subjective stuff: Unaffected in low vacuum applications? Big cam applications typically have a somewhat choppy, inconsistent idle. I've owned or ridden in more than one car w/a 'big' cam & the power steering was less than stellar @ low speed. That same power steering pump would be what's pressurizing your brakes. Of course this was years ago when I was younger so it was possibly the set-ups not being ideal. My point is I've seen more than one cam grind w/the disclaimer "not recommended for power accessory applications". Takes up less space? Visually (looking @ the firewall), maybe. Realistically though, where the base bracket of each booster contacts the firewall, they utilize the exact same holes & thus have the same 'foot-print'. You would have several hydraulic hoses running from the firewall down to the front of the motor w/the HB set-up that the vacuum set-up doesn't have. You usually also have a larger capacity fluid reservior that a vacuum set-up doesn't have. Visually to me, those exta items are just as bad as the vacuum 'can' & thus a wash (as well as more places for fluid leaks). Popular, common swap, in 'other' vehicles? Installing brakes that offer increased clamping force over vacuum in big trucks (or trucks w/large x huge diameter wheels) makes sense. High perf cars w/less than adequate braking systems? Sure. Smaller 1/2 ton swb trucks though? My old 74 could lock the brakes up easily w/ just vacuum assist. Swapping to even more clamping force would have yielded a brake set-up that was too 'touchy' in my application. Locking up sooner does not equate to better braking performance; controlled application of the braking force is better braking. The HB system is definitely an improvement for many applications; but I don't think it's an 'absolute' better swap.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
08-31-2011, 08:18 PM | #9 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Clute, TX.
Posts: 1,935
|
Re: Hydro assist brakes
Thanks I think it'll stay
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
2004 Silverado Crewcab 1972 Chevy Monte Carlo 2017 Chevy Tahoe |
08-31-2011, 09:34 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,025
|
Re: Hydro assist brakes
I wouldn't get rid of them if the system functioned correctly unless the asthetics really bothered you.
The reasons I did the swap on mine were all of the crimped hoses were leaking as well an eyesore IMO, the steering pump was leaking, & the accumulator did not work. I priced a LAPS rebuilt HB unit, steering pump, & new custom hoses for better asthetic routing. It was significantly more (4x more) than the <$100 for a rebuilt vacuum booster. I already had a rebuilt vac boost unit w/very limited use from one of my other trucks so the swap so far has been free (free is good when evaluating something). I'll give the vacuum a try & see how it fares. If I feel the braking pressure is not adequate for my application, I'll spend the money to freshen the HB w/some custom lines to improve the under hood visual appeal.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
08-31-2011, 10:27 PM | #11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Delta,Pa
Posts: 14,950
|
Re: Hydro assist brakes
Hydroboost is a blessing with my very rowdy small block. Duration is 246/252@ .050. Vacuum is all but non existent. Brakes work awesome all the time. No more running out of vacuum and having a rock hard brake pedal. I can lock the wheels up at will.
__________________
Owner of North Point Car Care in Dundalk Md. We specialize in custom exhaust on both modern and classic vehicles. We are a full service auto shop from classics to modern vehicles. Feel free to contact me with questions. I will give a 10% discount to any board member. |
09-01-2011, 12:40 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: White City, SK
Posts: 411
|
Re: Hydro assist brakes
All things being equal, such as the age and repair of the respective systems, hydroboost brakes are better for stopping large loads in large trucks. Greater pedal pressure and clamping pressures, work in low vacuum environments such as just off idle pulling heavy loads, or big cams or diesels. But I've owned a lot of 3/4 ton and 1 tons that just had vacuum assist and they worked fine when pulling heavy loads.
Aesthetics and beauty are in the eye of the beholder so do whatever floats your boat and it will work a-ok. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|