The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-30-2011, 08:31 PM   #1
bigd65
Registered User
 
bigd65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Clute, TX.
Posts: 1,935
Hydro assist brakes

Just trying to gets halls outlook on them. I have been contemplating getting rid of the hydro assist brake for the conventional vacuum booster brakes. What do y'all think
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
2004 Silverado Crewcab
1972 Chevy Monte Carlo
2017 Chevy Tahoe
bigd65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2011, 09:41 PM   #2
my4by2
Registered User
 
my4by2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Hot Springs, AR.
Posts: 1,215
Re: Hydro assist brakes

Why would you though? Hydra-boost systems are far more powerful & efficient that vacuum set-ups are... Plus, if you plan to run a large cam with low vacuum or anything, the brakes won't get affected. Just my 2 cents worth on it.
__________________
1977 Chevrolet K30 LWB Crew Cab
497HP Mast Motorsports 6.0L LY6 HO engine
GM NV4500 5-speed, Centerforce clutch + NP205
D60 + 14-bolt FF w/ Eaton posi + disc brakes
Skyjacker 2.5" full spring lift w/ Nitro shocks
Custom paint + interior
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=435722
my4by2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2011, 10:21 PM   #3
kwin
Registered User
 
kwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Grande Prairie, Alberta
Posts: 368
Re: Hydro assist brakes

Agreed! Takes up less space, works better, you would be stepping backward to get rid of it. There is a reason that hydro boost is a popular swap on other vehicles.

KEEP IT!
kwin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2011, 10:24 PM   #4
Altec
Getcha Pull
 
Altec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 691
Re: Hydro assist brakes

Quote:
Originally Posted by my4by2 View Post
Why would you though? Hydra-boost systems are far more powerful & efficient that vacuum set-ups are... Plus, if you plan to run a large cam with low vacuum or anything, the brakes won't get affected. Just my 2 cents worth on it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwin View Post
Agreed! Takes up less space, works better, you would be stepping backward to get rid of it. There is a reason that hydro boost is a popular swap on other vehicles.

KEEP IT!
Nothing I can add...
__________________
'81 K10 454/SM465
'86 S10 Blazer
'95 H-D Softail
'96 Integra
Altec is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2011, 10:25 PM   #5
71swb4x4
Senior Member
 
71swb4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brookings, SD
Posts: 10,497
Re: Hydro assist brakes

I did the opposite, got rid of the vacuum and installed the hydro-boost. Couldn't be happier. Never in my wildest dreams would I consider investing time or money to get rid of them.
__________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't good for anything, but you can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs.
71swb4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2011, 11:37 PM   #6
Cherub
Registered User
 
Cherub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 970
Re: Hydro assist brakes

Im one that was wondering the opposite. From everyones comments i hear that going to hydroboost would be a great option.
Cherub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-30-2011, 11:48 PM   #7
H8PVMNT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Highwood, MT
Posts: 24
Re: Hydro assist brakes

We just bought an '88 with hydroboost and it stops better than my '08. Good system, why change it?
H8PVMNT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 12:40 AM   #8
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,025
Re: Hydro assist brakes

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigd65 View Post
Just trying to gets halls outlook on them. I have been contemplating getting rid of the hydro assist brake for the conventional vacuum booster brakes. What do y'all think
It really depends on why you're contemplating getting rid of them. The non-debated 'pro' as others have stated is greater pedal pressure w/less effort vs. vacuum boost applications.

The debatable or subjective stuff:

Unaffected in low vacuum applications? Big cam applications typically have a somewhat choppy, inconsistent idle. I've owned or ridden in more than one car w/a 'big' cam & the power steering was less than stellar @ low speed. That same power steering pump would be what's pressurizing your brakes. Of course this was years ago when I was younger so it was possibly the set-ups not being ideal. My point is I've seen more than one cam grind w/the disclaimer "not recommended for power accessory applications".

Takes up less space? Visually (looking @ the firewall), maybe. Realistically though, where the base bracket of each booster contacts the firewall, they utilize the exact same holes & thus have the same 'foot-print'. You would have several hydraulic hoses running from the firewall down to the front of the motor w/the HB set-up that the vacuum set-up doesn't have. You usually also have a larger capacity fluid reservior that a vacuum set-up doesn't have. Visually to me, those exta items are just as bad as the vacuum 'can' & thus a wash (as well as more places for fluid leaks).

Popular, common swap, in 'other' vehicles? Installing brakes that offer increased clamping force over vacuum in big trucks (or trucks w/large x huge diameter wheels) makes sense. High perf cars w/less than adequate braking systems? Sure. Smaller 1/2 ton swb trucks though? My old 74 could lock the brakes up easily w/ just vacuum assist. Swapping to even more clamping force would have yielded a brake set-up that was too 'touchy' in my application. Locking up sooner does not equate to better braking performance; controlled application of the braking force is better braking.

The HB system is definitely an improvement for many applications; but I don't think it's an 'absolute' better swap.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 08:18 PM   #9
bigd65
Registered User
 
bigd65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Clute, TX.
Posts: 1,935
Re: Hydro assist brakes

Thanks I think it'll stay
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
2004 Silverado Crewcab
1972 Chevy Monte Carlo
2017 Chevy Tahoe
bigd65 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 09:34 PM   #10
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,025
Re: Hydro assist brakes

Quote:
Originally Posted by bigd65 View Post
Thanks I think it'll stay
I wouldn't get rid of them if the system functioned correctly unless the asthetics really bothered you.

The reasons I did the swap on mine were all of the crimped hoses were leaking as well an eyesore IMO, the steering pump was leaking, & the accumulator did not work. I priced a LAPS rebuilt HB unit, steering pump, & new custom hoses for better asthetic routing. It was significantly more (4x more) than the <$100 for a rebuilt vacuum booster. I already had a rebuilt vac boost unit w/very limited use from one of my other trucks so the swap so far has been free (free is good when evaluating something).

I'll give the vacuum a try & see how it fares. If I feel the braking pressure is not adequate for my application, I'll spend the money to freshen the HB w/some custom lines to improve the under hood visual appeal.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-31-2011, 10:27 PM   #11
cableguy0
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Delta,Pa
Posts: 14,950
Re: Hydro assist brakes

Hydroboost is a blessing with my very rowdy small block. Duration is 246/252@ .050. Vacuum is all but non existent. Brakes work awesome all the time. No more running out of vacuum and having a rock hard brake pedal. I can lock the wheels up at will.
__________________
Owner of North Point Car Care in Dundalk Md. We specialize in custom exhaust on both modern and classic vehicles. We are a full service auto shop from classics to modern vehicles. Feel free to contact me with questions. I will give a 10% discount to any board member.
cableguy0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2011, 12:40 PM   #12
jimbonice
Registered User
 
jimbonice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: White City, SK
Posts: 411
Re: Hydro assist brakes

All things being equal, such as the age and repair of the respective systems, hydroboost brakes are better for stopping large loads in large trucks. Greater pedal pressure and clamping pressures, work in low vacuum environments such as just off idle pulling heavy loads, or big cams or diesels. But I've owned a lot of 3/4 ton and 1 tons that just had vacuum assist and they worked fine when pulling heavy loads.

Aesthetics and beauty are in the eye of the beholder so do whatever floats your boat and it will work a-ok.
jimbonice is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com