Has anyone used the LH8 pan in their swap? - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

Jonboy · 03-07-2012, 01:25 PM

Like teh title says, has anyone used the LH8 (GMPP Muscle Car swap oil pan) in their LS swap yet? I am getting ready to do a 5.3 swap in my '74, and do a sectioned crossmember at the same time. It is already low, so anyting to help with clearance would be great. I think the 2001 truck pan is going to be waaaay too low. Any thoughts?

Indian113 · 03-07-2012, 04:15 PM

I think I will have to when I put my 5.3 in my S10. Have you bought yours yet? I found one for $138.00 + shipping.

Jonboy · 03-07-2012, 05:34 PM

I went ahead and bought it today. I work at a Chevrolet dealer, but we aren't a GMPP stocking dealer. It wasn't too far off of list, but it will be here tomorrow.

mooseknuckles · 03-07-2012, 10:53 PM

I used one on mine, but it's not in the truck yet so I don't know where it will sit.....but its prob 1 1/2" shorter than the truck pan...I think the f-body pans are lower still....

BACKYARD88 · 03-08-2012, 07:23 PM

I have one for mine and it clears the Dropmember fine.

Notch1988 · 03-08-2012, 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BACKYARD88

I have one for mine and it clears the Dropmember fine.

How low does it hang vs the dropmember?

BACKYARD88 · 03-08-2012, 10:43 PM

If I remember correctly it stays above the Dropmember. I can look tomorrow after work to make sure.
Posted via Mobile Device

flamingbig10 · 03-09-2012, 12:13 AM

I have one on mine but the pan hangs lower than the cross member

Jonboy · 03-09-2012, 12:30 AM

How much lower? I was actually going to go with a sectioned crossmember, too.

72gmcshorty · 03-09-2012, 01:53 AM

You do realize the pan will sit at different levels based on the engine mounts used? It might be more helpful if people told you what mount setup they were using.

nibs · 03-09-2012, 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BACKYARD88

I have one for mine and it clears the Dropmember fine.

Hmmm, good to know... Is your dropmember the standard or extreme? I wonder if it would make a difference with the fitment

72gmcshorty · 03-09-2012, 09:40 AM

from the info i found, the lh8 pan is a hummer H2 pan. I saw a picture comparing the 2 and they are almost identical in size. If you are looking for clearance, look up a cadillac CTS-V pan. It is a few inches shorter at the crossmember.

BACKYARD88 · 03-09-2012, 12:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nibs

Hmmm, good to know... Is your dropmember the standard or extreme? I wonder if it would make a difference with the fitment

I'm not really sure, there was only one when I bought mine lol. It is the 3.2.

nibs · 03-09-2012, 12:10 PM

Ok, I will have to ask ol Nate if this will fit with mine

BR3W CITY · 03-09-2012, 12:30 PM

I used the GMPP pan as well, with I6 perches and mount adapters. It hangs right at the crossmember level in my 66. It actually looks like its a bit below, but with the suspension at full compression, the crossmember bottoms out before the pan does on something like a big dip in the road.

Jonboy · 03-09-2012, 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 72gmcshorty

You do realize the pan will sit at different levels based on the engine mounts used? It might be more helpful if people told you what mount setup they were using.

Good call. I am using the Dirty Dingo mounts. I was also concerned with the length of teh sump (the clearance behind the crossmember). The CTS-V pan has a longer (front to back) sump.

BACKYARD88 · 03-15-2012, 12:02 PM

Mine is almost dead even with the bottom of the Dropmember.

gringoloco · 03-19-2012, 02:01 PM

Any more updates on this? Would be good to see pics of people's setups with the LH8 pan installed...
Posted via Mobile Device

mooseknuckles · 03-19-2012, 06:52 PM

mine....

72gmcshorty · 03-19-2012, 07:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mooseknuckles

mine....

Is that a truck oil pan? (What's a mooseknuckle anyways...

)

mooseknuckles · 03-19-2012, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 72gmcshorty

Is that a truck oil pan? (What's a mooseknuckle anyways...

)

lol.....lh8/gm muscle car pan...the truck pan is about a 1 1/2" deeper.....

Jonboy · 03-29-2012, 09:35 AM

I talked to Brent at Dirty Dingo for a while yesterday. He recommends the F-body pan to ensure adequate clearance. Since I am planning on running a sectioned crossmember, I will need all the clearance I can get. The F-body pan looks to be a bit cheaper than the CTS-V pan also.

68Stepbed · 03-29-2012, 12:00 PM

I bought a truck pan for mine, but it hung too low. I ended up going with an F-body pan, and I have much better clearance. Check out my engine swap thread titled "Project: LS1ick68".

I'm using Trans Dapt adapters with POL tubular engine towers.

mooseknuckles · 03-29-2012, 08:41 PM

buy an f-body one, they are the shallowest ones so far....

BACKYARD88 · 03-31-2012, 11:45 PM

I tried to take the pics from a couple different angles. I dont have drop spindles yet so the front isn't laying completely out. The LH8 pan is about 2 1/2 inches deeper than the F-body pan. At the most a tiny sliver of the pan and a small part of the oil plug boss hangs below the Dropmember.

03-07-2012, 01:25 PM	#1
Jonboy Slots go on anything! Join Date: May 2003 Location: Richardson, TX Posts: 5,957	Has anyone used the LH8 pan in their swap? Like teh title says, has anyone used the LH8 (GMPP Muscle Car swap oil pan) in their LS swap yet? I am getting ready to do a 5.3 swap in my '74, and do a sectioned crossmember at the same time. It is already low, so anyting to help with clearance would be great. I think the 2001 truck pan is going to be waaaay too low. Any thoughts? __________________ 1974 Jimmy- 5.3/4L80e/NP241

03-07-2012, 04:15 PM	#2
Indian113 Registered User Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Monroe,Iowa Posts: 4,370	Re: Has anyone used the LH8 pan in their swap? I think I will have to when I put my 5.3 in my S10. Have you bought yours yet? I found one for $138.00 + shipping.

03-07-2012, 05:34 PM	#3
Jonboy Slots go on anything! Join Date: May 2003 Location: Richardson, TX Posts: 5,957	Re: Has anyone used the LH8 pan in their swap? I went ahead and bought it today. I work at a Chevrolet dealer, but we aren't a GMPP stocking dealer. It wasn't too far off of list, but it will be here tomorrow. __________________ 1974 Jimmy- 5.3/4L80e/NP241

03-07-2012, 10:53 PM	#4
mooseknuckles Registered User Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: ottawa,canada Posts: 4,550	Re: Has anyone used the LH8 pan in their swap? I used one on mine, but it's not in the truck yet so I don't know where it will sit.....but its prob 1 1/2" shorter than the truck pan...I think the f-body pans are lower still.... Attached Images __________________ my build threads '86 C10 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=415628 '67 C10 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=635078 '63 GMC http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=674682

03-08-2012, 07:23 PM	#5
BACKYARD88 On the fast track to nowhere.. Join Date: May 2006 Location: Splendora, Texas Posts: 5,316	Re: Has anyone used the LH8 pan in their swap? I have one for mine and it clears the Dropmember fine. __________________ -Mike Owen- Support the board here! 71 Chevy short fleet build thread Double D Norwood, Houston, Cecilia, Jackson, Monroe and counting

03-08-2012, 10:43 PM	#7
BACKYARD88 On the fast track to nowhere.. Join Date: May 2006 Location: Splendora, Texas Posts: 5,316	Re: Has anyone used the LH8 pan in their swap? If I remember correctly it stays above the Dropmember. I can look tomorrow after work to make sure. Posted via Mobile Device __________________ -Mike Owen- Support the board here! 71 Chevy short fleet build thread Double D Norwood, Houston, Cecilia, Jackson, Monroe and counting Last edited by BACKYARD88; 03-08-2012 at 10:44 PM. Reason: iPhone

03-09-2012, 12:13 AM	#8
flamingbig10 6.0 powered square Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Mesquite texas Posts: 3,459	Re: Has anyone used the LH8 pan in their swap? I have one on mine but the pan hangs lower than the cross member __________________ Aaron 1980 c-10 short bed lowered, cammed 6.0, 4l80e 3600 stall, smp tune, wilwoods, and flames best time so far best et 7.86 @87 on motor 7.57 90 on a 75 shot Build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=283326

03-09-2012, 12:30 AM	#9
Jonboy Slots go on anything! Join Date: May 2003 Location: Richardson, TX Posts: 5,957	Re: Has anyone used the LH8 pan in their swap? How much lower? I was actually going to go with a sectioned crossmember, too. __________________ 1974 Jimmy- 5.3/4L80e/NP241

03-09-2012, 01:53 AM	#10
72gmcshorty Registered User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: North Delta, British Columbia Posts: 1,344	Re: Has anyone used the LH8 pan in their swap? You do realize the pan will sit at different levels based on the engine mounts used? It might be more helpful if people told you what mount setup they were using. __________________ 1992 Gmc 2wd 1972 Chevy Blazer 2wd

03-09-2012, 09:40 AM	#12
72gmcshorty Registered User Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: North Delta, British Columbia Posts: 1,344	Re: Has anyone used the LH8 pan in their swap? from the info i found, the lh8 pan is a hummer H2 pan. I saw a picture comparing the 2 and they are almost identical in size. If you are looking for clearance, look up a cadillac CTS-V pan. It is a few inches shorter at the crossmember. __________________ 1992 Gmc 2wd 1972 Chevy Blazer 2wd

03-09-2012, 12:10 PM	#14
nibs JRods Garage Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: East Highland, CA Posts: 1,098	Re: Has anyone used the LH8 pan in their swap? Ok, I will have to ask ol Nate if this will fit with mine __________________ Orange Julius-My dropmember'd, LS'd, SWB street machine...

03-09-2012, 12:30 PM	#15
BR3W CITY meowMEOWmeowMEOW Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: MKE WI Posts: 7,128	Re: Has anyone used the LH8 pan in their swap? I used the GMPP pan as well, with I6 perches and mount adapters. It hangs right at the crossmember level in my 66. It actually looks like its a bit below, but with the suspension at full compression, the crossmember bottoms out before the pan does on something like a big dip in the road. __________________ *'66 Short Step / SD Tuned / Big Cam LQ4 / Backhalfed /Built 4l80e / #REBUILDEVERYTHING* MY BUILD THE H8RDCPTR //\\ MY YOUTUBE CHANNEL REV J HD

03-15-2012, 12:02 PM	#17
BACKYARD88 On the fast track to nowhere.. Join Date: May 2006 Location: Splendora, Texas Posts: 5,316	Re: Has anyone used the LH8 pan in their swap? Mine is almost dead even with the bottom of the Dropmember. __________________ -Mike Owen- Support the board here! 71 Chevy short fleet build thread Double D Norwood, Houston, Cecilia, Jackson, Monroe and counting

03-19-2012, 02:01 PM	#18
gringoloco A guy with a truck Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Germany, for now Posts: 5,921	Re: Has anyone used the LH8 pan in their swap? Any more updates on this? Would be good to see pics of people's setups with the LH8 pan installed... Posted via Mobile Device __________________ -Chris Instagram _elgringoloco_ '70 Short-Wide How to: Ruin a perfectly good C10 ‘70 Blazer ConversionHow To: Ruin a Perfectly Good 4wd '72 Highlander How To: Ruin a Perfectly Good K/5 (SOLD) '72 Blazer 2WD How to: Ruin a perfectly good Blazer (SOLD) '05 Yukon Daily Driven (not so stock) Yukon (SOLD) ‘07 Yukon Denali (daily) Members met list: SCOTI, darkhorse970, 67cheby, 67cheby'sGirl, klmore, porterbuilt, n2billet, Fastrucken, classicchev, Col Clank, GSFMECH, HuggerCST, Spray-Bomb, BACKYARD88, 5150, fine69, fatbass, smbrouss70, 65StreetCruiser, GAc10boy

03-19-2012, 06:52 PM	#19
mooseknuckles Registered User Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: ottawa,canada Posts: 4,550	Re: Has anyone used the LH8 pan in their swap? mine.... Attached Images __________________ my build threads '86 C10 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=415628 '67 C10 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=635078 '63 GMC http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=674682



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

03-29-2012, 09:35 AM	#22
Jonboy Slots go on anything! Join Date: May 2003 Location: Richardson, TX Posts: 5,957	Re: Has anyone used the LH8 pan in their swap? I talked to Brent at Dirty Dingo for a while yesterday. He recommends the F-body pan to ensure adequate clearance. Since I am planning on running a sectioned crossmember, I will need all the clearance I can get. The F-body pan looks to be a bit cheaper than the CTS-V pan also. __________________ 1974 Jimmy- 5.3/4L80e/NP241

03-29-2012, 12:00 PM	#23
68Stepbed Registered User Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: 10-Uh-See Posts: 5,609	Re: Has anyone used the LH8 pan in their swap? I bought a truck pan for mine, but it hung too low. I ended up going with an F-body pan, and I have much better clearance. Check out my engine swap thread titled "Project: LS1ick68". I'm using Trans Dapt adapters with POL tubular engine towers. __________________ Matt 68 C10 stepside, LS1/700R4, TCI Engineering suspension system

03-29-2012, 08:41 PM	#24
mooseknuckles Registered User Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: ottawa,canada Posts: 4,550	Re: Has anyone used the LH8 pan in their swap? buy an f-body one, they are the shallowest ones so far.... __________________ my build threads '86 C10 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=415628 '67 C10 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=635078 '63 GMC http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=674682

03-31-2012, 11:45 PM	#25
BACKYARD88 On the fast track to nowhere.. Join Date: May 2006 Location: Splendora, Texas Posts: 5,316	Re: Has anyone used the LH8 pan in their swap? I tried to take the pics from a couple different angles. I dont have drop spindles yet so the front isn't laying completely out. The LH8 pan is about 2 1/2 inches deeper than the F-body pan. At the most a tiny sliver of the pan and a small part of the oil plug boss hangs below the Dropmember. __________________ -Mike Owen- Support the board here! 71 Chevy short fleet build thread Double D Norwood, Houston, Cecilia, Jackson, Monroe and counting Last edited by BACKYARD88; 04-02-2012 at 11:17 AM. Reason: Correct info.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.