Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-01-2013, 08:54 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Loraine, Illinois
Posts: 12
|
1969 c-10 rear end question
I have a 1969 Chevy C-10 with a 12 bolt rear end with 3.73 gears in it. I am wanting to change the gearing to a 3.08 but I understand that I would need to change the carrier to make the 3.08 gears work. Can anybody tell me what vehicles would have the correct carrier that would fit in my rear end to allow the 3.08 gears to work. Would a mid 70 truck have the correct carrier in the rear end? Does anybody have a carrier they would sell for my needs?
Any help would be appreciated.Thanks |
10-02-2013, 07:45 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Loraine, Illinois
Posts: 12
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
Does anybody have any ideas on which year truck would have the correct carrier I need?
|
10-02-2013, 08:10 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Wichita Ks
Posts: 495
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
Ive been doing a little research and I dont see anywhere that says you cant install 3.08 gears.
Im a little curious as to why you would want to get rid of the 3.73 gears. They seem like the magic number for most builds.
__________________
71 swb 350/4sp manual 5/7 static drop |
10-02-2013, 08:56 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Loraine, Illinois
Posts: 12
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
From what I have been told is that the carrier that's in the rear end now are for 3.73 and up. If I want to go to a 3.08 gearing I need to change the carrier. I believe the carrier in it now is a series 4 and I believe I need a series 3 for the 3.08 gears.
When driving on the interstate the motor is running tight at 65 mph. Like to have it run less RPM at 65 mph and hopefully get better fuel mileage. Last edited by HowellKTM95; 10-02-2013 at 09:11 AM. |
10-02-2013, 08:57 AM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Loraine, Illinois
Posts: 12
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
It has a sb350 in the truck and a automatic 3 speed.
Last edited by HowellKTM95; 10-02-2013 at 09:14 AM. |
10-02-2013, 09:09 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Loraine, Illinois
Posts: 12
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
Would it be better to change the rim size instead?
|
10-02-2013, 09:20 AM | #7 |
The Older Generation
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montezuma, Iowa
Posts: 25,772
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
-
Depending on what brand of rear end you have It might be easier and cheaper to just change the whole rear end. I just did it on my '69 Suburban. Someone will correct me if I'm wrong but if you have the HO52 you can change the carrier as a unit. If you have a Dana you have to replace the ring and pinion gears. New gears are around 200 bucks and another $100 to install them and set them up. Unless you have experience in gear setup it may not be something you can do yourself.... LockDoc
__________________
Leon Locksmith, Specializing In Antique Trucks, Automobiles, & Motorcycles (My Dually Pickup Project Thread) http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=829820 - |
10-02-2013, 09:28 AM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Loraine, Illinois
Posts: 12
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
Any suggestion on what year of truck rear end would fit underneath my with 3.08 gears. I currently have 6 bolt lugs. Would like to stay with a 6 bolt lugs so I don't have to change the rims and tires yet.
Thanks |
10-02-2013, 09:49 AM | #9 | ||
"I ain't nobody, dork."
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,971
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
There are a lot of 67-72 truck 12 bolts out there with 3 series carriers in them... There might even be 3.08 gears that are made to fit a 4 series carrier.
Need to do a little more research. What RPM's are you doing at 60? A stock SBC will handle 2,500 to 3,000 RPM's no problem. You're probably just used to modern engines with OD transmissions running at 1,600 to 1,800 RPM's on the highway. Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars... My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread. The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck Quote:
Quote:
|
||
10-02-2013, 09:59 AM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Loraine, Illinois
Posts: 12
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
I have searched online for a long time trying to find a used series 3 carrier for my rear end with no luck. Summit sells a carrier that will work, but a little high price for my blood at this time.
The RPM's are around 3000 at 60. |
10-02-2013, 10:44 AM | #11 | ||
"I ain't nobody, dork."
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,971
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
3,000 at 60 is pretty normal for a SBC. They are made to handle it.
But I'm assuming that gas mileage is your main concern. 90% of the used carriers you're lookin' for are dang near 40 years old. A new one would be a good investment into the reliablitlity of your rig. Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars... My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread. The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck Quote:
Quote:
|
||
10-02-2013, 10:50 AM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: White Salmon, WA
Posts: 263
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
My '69 and most came with 3.08 as standard equipment. So should be easy to locate a salvage. I'm now on 3.73 with a 29" rear tire and spin at 2800 down the freeway around 65mph.
|
10-02-2013, 10:54 AM | #13 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Victoria, B.C
Posts: 3,794
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
Quote:
My (loose) understanding is that the series 3 carrier was sometimes used with 3:73's as well as the lower 3:08 ratio although I'm not sure how they defined the 3:73 gear set up to work with both carriers. If it has not been checked then I would start at that point rather than speculating. As well perhaps some of the other members who have done this particular change can point you in the right direction on the I.d. My two bits. Coley
__________________
....for some men, there is experience, skill and effort....for the others...there is visa and UPS LOL 1966 Chevy 1/2 ton (Florida- Red/white) 1972 Chevy 1/2 ton (California- Blue/white) 2005 Chevy Silverado HD2500/Duramax 2000 Dodge Ram 1500 |
|
10-02-2013, 12:12 PM | #14 |
67-72 parts collector,…
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,700
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
Call these guys.
They can answer all your questions. No more guessing. http://www.ringpinion.com/Default.aspx
__________________
Keith Convert to disc brakes. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823 |
10-02-2013, 12:27 PM | #15 | |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tucson
Posts: 2,183
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
Quote:
2.73 and numerically lower (Series 2) 2.76 thru 3.42 ratios (Series 3) 3.73 & numerically higher (Series 4) Since ring gear inner dimension and bolt circle are different, the series 2, 3 & 4 gear sets are not interchangeable. Your carrier is a series 4. You will need a series 3 to fit a 3.08 gearset. |
|
10-02-2013, 05:28 PM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Prescott Valley AZ
Posts: 345
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
Is your truck a coil spring truck or leaf? Changing the complete rear would most likely be the easiest and cheapest if you find a rear reasonably priced. They are not hard to find around here but maybe where you are they are. I generally scrap them, maybe I should rethink that.
|
10-02-2013, 05:38 PM | #17 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: billings, mt
Posts: 703
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
Quote:
__________________
1969 Chevy C10 2wd stepside longbox |
|
10-03-2013, 01:32 PM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Loraine, Illinois
Posts: 12
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
My truck has coil springs on it. What year truck would have a 3.08 gears and 6 lug that would fit?
|
10-03-2013, 01:33 PM | #19 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Loraine, Illinois
Posts: 12
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
I have been watching E-Bay for awhile now with no luck. Will continue to watch though.
|
10-03-2013, 01:38 PM | #20 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Loraine, Illinois
Posts: 12
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
If anybody has a series three carrier for a chevy 12 bolt they want to sell please contact me. Thanks
|
10-03-2013, 02:27 PM | #21 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Prescott Valley AZ
Posts: 345
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
Coil springs would be pre 72. Six lug would be 70 and earlier exceopt 4x4 but thats leaf springs anyway. I may accidently have a 3:07 carrier, i'll do some checking. I assume you want a ring and pinion too.
|
10-03-2013, 07:29 PM | #22 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Prescott Valley AZ
Posts: 345
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
It looks like I have one with 3:07 gears. I'll need to pull it and see what kind of shape its really in.
|
10-03-2013, 07:45 PM | #23 | |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Tucson
Posts: 2,183
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
Quote:
Codes stamped on the axle tube for 3.07 are: 3.07=HB, LL, RA, TR, TT (series 3) 3.73=HA, HJ, HQ, MF, TQ (series 4) |
|
10-03-2013, 07:50 PM | #24 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Prescott Valley AZ
Posts: 345
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
My 70 K-10 had a 3:07 posi. Its on the SPID and my folks bought the truck new so I can verify. 4 low brake stands without the hubs locked broke it in half. So much for youth. lol.
|
10-03-2013, 10:05 PM | #25 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cedar Park, Texas
Posts: 7,500
|
Re: 1969 c-10 rear end question
I swapped the 3.73 open that was originally in my 71 GMC 6 cyl 3 ott for a 3.07 posi. A lot of the big block trucks had 3.07 posi rears.
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|