The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-12-2004, 12:33 AM   #1
SixthFloorFreak
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Morgantown, KY
Posts: 103
T-56 In my 84

my dad has offered to buy/build a motor and transmission for me. we initially had talked about putting a Muncie in my truck, but i offered up the idea of the T-56 since we've had trouble finding a good Muncie, and i sure would like them two extra gears. i haven't done much looking around yet, but what kind of price can i expect on a used T-56 out of an F-Body ( i assume that's where most people get em)?

are there any tips ya'll can provide when shopping for one of these trannies?
SixthFloorFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 01:35 AM   #2
1972C10
Account Suspended
 
1972C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,686
anywhere from 500-1000 friend of mine has one in a 95 gmc maria conversion truck 4th gear is 1-1 like a th350 so the two extra gears will help alot.

your gonna have to put a hydralic clutch out of a 86 or 87 model and do some kinda custom line cause they use a plastic line i think

I know they have the internal slave cylinder ive got an article in a hot rod magzine where they drill out some line restriction for better clutch activation ill dig it up if you wanna hear about it.
1972C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 01:38 AM   #3
SixthFloorFreak
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Morgantown, KY
Posts: 103
Quote:
Originally posted by 1972C10
anywhere from 500-1000 friend of mine has one in a 95 gmc maria conversion truck 4th gear is 1-1 like a th350 so the two extra gears will help alot.

your gonna have to put a hydralic clutch out of a 86 or 87 model and do some kinda custom line cause they use a plastic line i think

I know they have the internal slave cylinder ive got an article in a hot rod magzine where they drill out some line restriction for better clutch activation ill dig it up if you wanna hear about it.
i'd deeply appreciate any info you can dig up
SixthFloorFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 09:09 AM   #4
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
Unless your running a very mild cam, 6th gear might be useless w/o the right differential gearing. Keep the engine torque as high as possible @ cruise rpm. Also, make sure your d.shaft is well balanced.

Keisler Automotive makes a retro-fit t-56 that uses the old style push clutch/throw-out bearing set-up (a stock early bellhousing works) so you don't have to go hydraulic. This trans is also based on a Viper trans re-fitted w/GM shafts.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 04:49 PM   #5
Tom
driving is in my blood
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 5,748
5th and 6th are overdrives, with 6th being a .50 [thats massive] so a 3.73 rear gear would be minimum with this trans and any motor with a bigger then stock cam.
__________________
-78 c10 short/step: 388cid, M20, 5/5 drop, lots more. Playtoy and first vehicle.
-98 c1500 x-cab: 5.7L, 17" rims, 5/6 drop, flowmaster, helper bags,NBS rear disk brakes.
-02 Suburban 4x4: leveled front
-CBR600F4i, CBR600RR, CBR1000RR, and standup skis
DISCLAIMER: I cant spell for the life of me.
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 05:11 PM   #6
PHOENIX
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 4,703
http://www.standardtransmission.com/BW_T-56.html
__________________
* AVOID: LOPER'S PERMORANCE / LOPERSPEED.COM OF PHOENIX, AZ & COTTMAN TRANSMISSION *
PHOENIX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 10:52 PM   #7
SixthFloorFreak
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Morgantown, KY
Posts: 103
Quote:
Originally posted by Tom
5th and 6th are overdrives, with 6th being a .50 [thats massive] so a 3.73 rear gear would be minimum with this trans and any motor with a bigger then stock cam.
i don't quite understand what you're saying

3.73 is as high a gear as i would want to run, is that what you're saying?
SixthFloorFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 11:06 PM   #8
apstguy
LED King
 
apstguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 2,087
I think that is so. I have 3.08 on my truck with a 305 & a TH700 (overdrive is .75 on 700's) I am at 2100 RPM at 90 mph. With that low of gears on a 6 speed, you could never get up to top speed. It would keep you from running at peak perfomance.
__________________
Tyler

1985 C10 305 w/ Bowtie OD TH700R4 3.42 LSD 202,000 miles
2006 Ford Focus ZX3 5-speed Stick
2016 Chevy Spark EV
Gone: 2002.5 VW GTI 24v VR6
Gone: 2008 VW R32
apstguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2004, 11:30 PM   #9
Tom
driving is in my blood
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 5,748
Im running a 3.07 rear also with a 2004r [.67 overdrive] and 255/60/15 tires. This means Im at 80mph doing about 2000rpm. I have a stock cammed vortec 350 in front of it, and its making over 300ft/lbs at 2000rpm. Even so its still loaded pretty good. Now imagine putting the engine down to about 1500rpm at the same 80mph. Your not going anywhere when you push the go pedal, and a larger then stock cammed motor is going to be bogging at this RPM even cruising. So 3.73's would be the minimum, with 4.10's are larger being the only direction away from 3.73's Id go.
__________________
-78 c10 short/step: 388cid, M20, 5/5 drop, lots more. Playtoy and first vehicle.
-98 c1500 x-cab: 5.7L, 17" rims, 5/6 drop, flowmaster, helper bags,NBS rear disk brakes.
-02 Suburban 4x4: leveled front
-CBR600F4i, CBR600RR, CBR1000RR, and standup skis
DISCLAIMER: I cant spell for the life of me.
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2004, 12:41 AM   #10
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
Also, too add to Toms info.... his mildly cammed combo is 'starting to load' @ 2000rpm, if you run a taller tire you will definitely want to run even deeper gears (min 3.73's, even better 4.10's).

A regular O.D. (.68 or .70) is what the trucks use because of the large frontal area that must be pushed through the air. You could utilize 6th for all out banzai blasts & just use 5th for typical hwy cruise speed.

Alot of LS1 f-body guys are swapping to 4.11's or 4.56's w/t56's & still getting decent hwy rpm's & serious eyeball flattening acceleration.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2004, 12:45 AM   #11
SixthFloorFreak
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Morgantown, KY
Posts: 103
i'm going to end up running a 295/40 20 rear tire, so what ration should i run in the rear?

also, i drove a 94 Z28 with a T56 and 4.10's, and lets just say ! would take off in 3rd if you wanted, and that thing would rip your nuts off
SixthFloorFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2004, 01:20 AM   #12
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,064
See, a 295/40/20 is almost 30" tall vs. that 25.75" tall tire on that 94 Z28. I would say 4.11's w/a mild cam (under 220 duration), 4.56's w/any cam bigger.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2004, 03:35 AM   #13
SixthFloorFreak
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Morgantown, KY
Posts: 103
Quote:
Originally posted by SCOTI
See, a 295/40/20 is almost 30" tall vs. that 25.75" tall tire on that 94 Z28. I would say 4.11's w/a mild cam (under 220 duration), 4.56's w/any cam bigger.
thanks for the tips bro

SixthFloorFreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com