The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Engine & Drivetrain

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-31-2015, 02:35 PM   #1
russellrox
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: saskatchewan
Posts: 172
Carbed 5.3 instead of fuel injection

Has anyone used this Accel unit to convert your 5.3 to a carbed unit with a holley intake and carb, looks pretty simple, or would you of rather done all the wiring and make it full fuel injection.
russellrox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2015, 04:20 PM   #2
Indian113
Registered User
 
Indian113's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Monroe,Iowa
Posts: 4,370
Re: Carbed 5.3 instead of fuel injection

When I put the 5.3 in my S10 I checked into going that route. I decided against it because I could buy a full reworked Harness for around the same as all that stuff was going to cost. The way my truck runs, starts and mpg's have made me very happy I stayed FE
Indian113 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2015, 05:28 PM   #3
66LSx
Registered User
 
66LSx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 435
Re: Carbed 5.3 instead of fuel injection

If your doing a carbed 5.3L.....

Save your money and just put a normal 350 in it.


my Fuel Injected 5.3L was the reason I did it....

More HP (vs carb)
Simply the easiest starting possible (vs carb)
Any auto store has in-stock any part needed (vs carb)
Easy to diagnose (read: my truck stops running.check engine light and I bring it to autozone and plug it OBDII in to find out exactly what is wrong... a carbed truck stops running and you go.... uhhhhh ? where do i start trouble shooting

Not even comparable MPG


Keep it FI... you'll regret it if you don't.

Oh.... and did I mention throttle response?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xLK1NFG2rkU


__________________
1966 C10 SWB Fleet
5.3L LM7 Vortec / 4L60e Swap
1966 C10 w/ 5.3L/4L60e Build Thread
2012 GMC Sierra 5.3L 4x4 CCSB

Last edited by 66LSx; 01-31-2015 at 05:40 PM.
66LSx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2015, 05:50 PM   #4
joedoh
Senior Member
 
joedoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Doodah Kansas
Posts: 7,774
Re: Carbed 5.3 instead of fuel injection

so the carb gets rid of the EFI portion, but what will you do about spark? no where to stab a distributor in.. you will still need the ECM and associated wiring and ECM flash to run the coil packs.

so I agree with above, if you are going to run a carb, get a carb 350. the GM EFI is about as simple as something gets, plenty of tutorials out there on modifying your own harness and you can disable the security in the ECM cheaply if you dont add a tune (thats where the money is)
__________________
the mass of men live lives of quiet desperation


if there is a problem, I can have it.

new project WAYNE http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=844393
joedoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2015, 05:53 PM   #5
russellrox
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: saskatchewan
Posts: 172
Re: Carbed 5.3 instead of fuel injection

the accel unit controls the coil packs, using the crank sensor so no need for a distributor, where are you guys buying your harnesses to work with the 5.3, or are you just modifying the one out of the truck it came from. I guess I will be staying with fuel injection then, just wanted to see what the general opinions were. Thanks for all the great info.
russellrox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2015, 06:22 PM   #6
joedoh
Senior Member
 
joedoh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Doodah Kansas
Posts: 7,774
Re: Carbed 5.3 instead of fuel injection

you only need to change the harness if the ECM doesnt fit in the rough location it was in the donor. otherwise all the plugs you need are already there and you can find the BATT and IGN input wires. some people use the simplified harnesses to clean up, some use them to run aftermarket gauges. you WILL need an ECM flash, to get rid of the key security and allow the engine to start.

those ignition controllers are $300+ bucks!
__________________
the mass of men live lives of quiet desperation


if there is a problem, I can have it.

new project WAYNE http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=844393
joedoh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2015, 06:50 PM   #7
66LSx
Registered User
 
66LSx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 435
Re: Carbed 5.3 instead of fuel injection

Quote:
Originally Posted by joedoh View Post
those ignition controllers are $300+ bucks!
FYI The ignition controller and carb/LS intake and carb itself are more then a brand new PSI conversions harness (which allowed me to put my ECM under the dash in-cab) and a retune by LT1swaps. (to remove emissions and security)

Note: You get some pretty cool features using the ECM.... I for example left my tow-haul feature enabled on my computer.... a simple momentary push button on my 66 dash and viola... tow haul mode... errr should i saw haul a$$ mode....

Technology is great once you embrace it (and thier really not too hard to wire... just patience)
__________________
1966 C10 SWB Fleet
5.3L LM7 Vortec / 4L60e Swap
1966 C10 w/ 5.3L/4L60e Build Thread
2012 GMC Sierra 5.3L 4x4 CCSB
66LSx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2015, 07:30 PM   #8
cableguy0
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Delta,Pa
Posts: 14,950
Re: Carbed 5.3 instead of fuel injection

Either way keeping the injection is cheaper. if your not terrified to open the harness yourself its definitely cheaper. I did a harness and mailed the computer to be tuned. Total cost to keep injection was about 100 bucks. It was a complete engine in the first place but I eliminated the trans control and emissions stuff.
__________________
Owner of North Point Car Care in Dundalk Md. We specialize in custom exhaust on both modern and classic vehicles. We are a full service auto shop from classics to modern vehicles. Feel free to contact me with questions. I will give a 10% discount to any board member.
cableguy0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 02:13 AM   #9
truckster
Senior Member
 
truckster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 7,954
Re: Carbed 5.3 instead of fuel injection

Quote:
Originally Posted by 66LSx View Post
Easy to diagnose (read: my truck stops running.check engine light and I bring it to autozone and plug it OBDII in to find out exactly what is wrong... a carbed truck stops running and you go.... uhhhhh ? where do i start trouble shooting
I won't argue with the benefits of fuel injection, but diagnosing a carbed engine is about as easy as it gets. There are only three elements: Fuel, air, and spark at the proper time. No sensors or computers.
truckster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 10:11 AM   #10
b454rat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 3,464
Re: Carbed 5.3 instead of fuel injection

I don't see the point in going to an LS if your gonna stay with a carb. Buddy did this, but he is experimenting with it, see where any weak spots are. He is running a hair dryer, weakest stock link was the intake, can't handle more than 20 pounds or something....
__________________
2000 GMC CCSB 454/4L80 6” lift SAS
1999 Chevy CCSB 454/NV4500 4” SAS
1999 GMC Yukon 350/4L60 6" SAS
b454rat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2015, 06:28 PM   #11
crazy longhorn
Fabricate till you "puke"
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,402
Re: Carbed 5.3 instead of fuel injection

I have heard it said, that it is like a religion, or political discussion? It can be a big bag of mess! For my app, I went carbed....used engine, I had already rebuilt the top end, & gaskets /seals. The truck intake was warped, dirty injectors, & in need of a wiring upgrade on the old truck. The dedicated fuel system, would have cost me as well (to run the fuelie)? My Brother handed me a 600 Edelbrock...not a hand out, a hand UP For me it was cheaper, to get that old truck rolling, & she don't run bad at all. Yes, you loose some of the "magic', that the fuelie had, such as the mileage? also the cold start drivability. I still have all the parts from the LS truck, but would go aftermarket, on an LS-1 setup, if I were to go fuel injected Longhorn
__________________
69 longhorn,4" chop,3/5 drop, 1/2 ton suspension/disc brakes,1 1/2" body drop,steel tilt clip, 5.3/Edelbrock rpm intake/600 carb, Hooker streetrod shorties,2 1/2" exhaust/ H pipe/50's Flows , 6 spd Richmond trans,12 bolt/ 3.40 gears....
crazy longhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com