New SSR, truck? or truck shaped car? - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

hgs_notes · 02-02-2004, 01:29 PM

Seems more like a vintage styled el camino or a cameo. I guess I need to see one up close and personal to decide if I like it or not.

HG

lukecp · 02-02-2004, 01:34 PM

I really don't like them. Kinda fugly to me....but i don't consider it a truck. Defenitly a truck-shaped car.

If only they had the 405hp LS6

mocwon · 02-02-2004, 01:44 PM

I think it is a really cool, retro-looking, vehicle whatever it is. I view it as a truck and I bet 90% or more of the folks that buy them won't put anything more than a bag of groceries or golf clubs in the back.

PanelDeland · 02-02-2004, 01:44 PM

Since it's about the size of an S-10 and has a cover over the bed, it seems more like a roadster than either.Of course that's just my opinion.

jamis · 02-02-2004, 01:50 PM

I think its cool, but not for the price.

**nightmare** · 02-02-2004, 02:07 PM

i think that it is going to be the new el-camino

VTKidder · 02-02-2004, 02:17 PM

Whatever people think it is.....just be glad chevy had the balls to make a retro roadster machine that has some power behind it. Remember the PT Cruiser?

djracer · 02-02-2004, 02:21 PM

Well said VtKidder! But the proto type did have the six liter! It took them long enough to get it out. I will be glad when they build a lighning killer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Alvin · 02-02-2004, 02:53 PM

I love how everyone is complaining that this thing doesn't have at least 500hp. It's a retractable hard-top roadster pick up, that's why it's expensive! Not to mention, not too long ago, 290 hp was a lot

I think it is a great vehicle. It is a good exercise in design, and I think it will be the same for Chevrolet as the Prowler was for Plymouth/Chrysler. It's a decent powered, extreme styled vehicle for the few who can afford it. And just like the Prowler, bolt a supercharger or nitrous onto it, and you've got your performance too.

**CPNE** · 02-02-2004, 03:09 PM

I like it but I wouldn't buy it if I were in the market for a "truck". That statement should give you some insight as to how I voted.

70ChevyLongbed · 02-02-2004, 03:45 PM

I just saw one on the road Saturday, I think it's kinda cool, but way too small for me... and I wouldn't buy one. It looks like it would fit in the bed of my truck

I'm glad Chevy is showing what they can make, like Alvin said, but I don't like the price. JMHO

**smitty62** · 02-02-2004, 06:42 PM

I think GM as well as other US manufacturers--(is there such a thing left?) are missing the boat big time. If you look at automobile history, the vehicles that made it to big sales and lasted more than 2-3 years are the simple designs. Ie; VW, pre-WW2 Chevys, Model T and A's, early Mustangs, Camaros and Novas, etc.
No silly gadgetry or wierd design that costs too much to build. No elaborate sound systems that you didn't want but have to pay for, no cup holders, weird paint jobs etc,. etc.
If the customer wants this stuff---and some of it, I confess, I do too, then the rodders and aftermarket will take care of that--the manufacturer should build a good, solid, basic machine that performs, handles, stops and has an esthetic shape. As it is, the mfgrs. are building in all this stuff so they can get the cup holder money instead of the aftermarket vendors. I don't NEED or want these people deciding what I should have in a car!
Bring back the 1st gen. SBC Camaro with the necessary updates like airbags, etc. but with improved seats and suspension and they will sell--forget the SSRs!!! AMEN! Thank you, thank you, thank you..........

hgs_notes · 02-02-2004, 11:16 PM

Quote:

the manufacturer should build a good, solid, basic machine that performs, handles, stops and has an esthetic shape

Smitty62, I think the mfg's are doing just that. Think Taurus, camry, lumina, intrepid, etc...

But even during all the years of the so called basic cars, Ford had the early T-bird, GM had the corvette. They always had some flash or they would be pidgeonholed into the bland moniker. How many people are searching high and wide for a late 50's dodge.

Think Pontiac excitement, not rambler.

HG

Gordo · 02-02-2004, 11:36 PM

I like it! I just wish it was in my price range. If it was 10K cheaper I would consider buying one and keep my S10 for the dirty work.

krue · 02-03-2004, 12:36 AM

Looks like fun, but I'll never own one!

bumpster · 02-03-2004, 01:05 AM

As a die hard chevy fan, I really hate to say this, but it does kind of look like a PT pickup. Of course I'm the one that said the new body style of the 1967 chevy I first saw in a founders day parade was ugly and would never catch on, now I have 3 and wish I had 30. Shows what little I knew huh?

weasel29gm · 02-03-2004, 01:12 AM

I like em' and if had the $$$$ I'd own one!!!!!!!

FRENCHBLUE72 · 02-03-2004, 01:23 AM

I think they are gonna be another lincoln blackwood...Just my 2 cent's worth.. But I do think they are trick looking..

**smitty62** · 02-03-2004, 01:54 AM

HGS
You think Taurus, Camry, Lumina, etc are the kind of cars I was talking about? You think that they are a good, basic, well handling, beautiful car? I don't think so!! Either I didn't express myself well or you need to read my comments again! You think those cars are comparable to a '69 Z-28? Or a 442?
Never in your lifetime will those plastic tu*ds you mentioned ever approach their value either economically or sentimentally.

*dtlilly* · 02-03-2004, 03:58 AM

I love the look, but not the size. They will be a fad vehicle for the select few to be able to afford the $10K over list they will demand.

minitruck_freq · 02-03-2004, 04:05 AM

GM should have put the 572 in them.

gmcnorton · 02-03-2004, 08:52 AM

i'm pretty sure there will be one in my garage within a year.......having a tough time not running out right now to buy one. want to wait to see if any short term problems with them first. gotta get one ............. I WONDER IF THEY WILL PUT A GMC EMBLEM ON ANY OF THEY?????????

superchevy · 02-03-2004, 11:14 AM

Fuuuuuugly!
Please don't call them the "new El Camino"...my Sprint's are crying at the thought.
SC

spencra · 02-03-2004, 03:48 PM

I really like them. I remember seeing an article on it a few years ago when it was just a concept car. I remember thinking that if Chevy ever does make it that I would be the first in line to buy one. That was of course before I read the estimated going price for them. That is just plain nuts what they are asking for them but I think I remember seeing that this thing has an engine on steroids in it or something.
I think that I like them alot because I am a huge fan of th 47-53 chevy models which I believe the concept came from.

**NGN** · 02-03-2004, 08:34 PM

I think it looks somewhat like an el-camino from the forty's - fifty's. I do like them but, for that price I'd get the SS Silverado. I agree with Smitty62 98%, but instead of airbags......improved kick@$$ a/c with no loss of hp.

View Poll Results: SSR, is it a truck?
Truck	21	27.27%
Truck shaped car	40	51.95%
El Camino	16	20.78%
Voters: 77. You may not vote on this poll

02-02-2004, 01:29 PM	#1
hgs_notes GEARHEAD Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: MN Posts: 6,126	New SSR, truck? or truck shaped car? Seems more like a vintage styled el camino or a cameo. I guess I need to see one up close and personal to decide if I like it or not. HG __________________ If no one knows what you're doing, they can't tell you you're doing it wrong HG's Dream Car Build - Shelby Cobra Kit Build your own adjustable track bar 71 Long Fleet C/10 72 Jimmy 4x4 (Junkyard Jimmy) HG's Plow Truck '78 K35 Dually Bigass Farm Truck HG's thread of miscellaneous stuff

02-02-2004, 01:34 PM	#2
lukecp Formerly yellow72custom Join Date: May 2001 Location: Austin, TX Posts: 7,531	I really don't like them. Kinda fugly to me....but i don't consider it a truck. Defenitly a truck-shaped car. If only they had the 405hp LS6 __________________ '72 Chevy C10 Mild 350/TH350/3.07. Ochre/White. Old high school ride. '70 GMC C2500 '62 327 4bbl/SM465/4.56-geared Dana 60. White/White. Project or parts truck. '97 Saturn SL DD. 1.9/5-speed. 40+ highway mpg

02-02-2004, 01:44 PM	#3
mocwon Keep On Truckin' Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: Buda, Texas Posts: 1,354	I think it is a really cool, retro-looking, vehicle whatever it is. I view it as a truck and I bet 90% or more of the folks that buy them won't put anything more than a bag of groceries or golf clubs in the back. __________________ Just Passin' Thru Some projects are like herding cats; others are like putting out fires; this one was like herding cats on fire.....

02-02-2004, 01:44 PM	#4
PanelDeland I am a Referee of life. Join Date: Jun 2000 Location: Greensboro N.C. Posts: 13,992	Since it's about the size of an S-10 and has a cover over the bed, it seems more like a roadster than either.Of course that's just my opinion. __________________ The 47-present Chevrolet and GMC Truck Message Board Network,it's owners,moderators,members,and associates of any type should not be held responsible for my opinion. You can't fix stupid,not even with duct tape. "My appearance is due to the fact that "GOD" does punish you for having too much fun!" Barrett-Jackson has perfected alchemy,they make rust into gold! "You can lead a horse to water but you can't saddle a duck" "Cleverly disguised as a 'Responsible Adult' "Sometimes your Knight in shining armor is just a retard in tinfoil"

02-02-2004, 01:50 PM	#5
jamis F.A.S.T. president Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Florida Posts: 1,883	I think its cool, but not for the price.

02-02-2004, 02:17 PM	#7
VTKidder Registered User Join Date: May 2003 Location: Vermont Posts: 996	Whatever people think it is.....just be glad chevy had the balls to make a retro roadster machine that has some power behind it. Remember the PT Cruiser?

02-02-2004, 02:21 PM	#8
djracer Registered User Join Date: Feb 2001 Location: Wetumpka, Al, U.S. Posts: 8,892	Well said VtKidder! But the proto type did have the six liter! It took them long enough to get it out. I will be glad when they build a lighning killer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! __________________ Kevin Special Thanks to All who have helped on the TRUCK! My Pass Time Show http://s129.photobucket.com/albums/p...Chapter1-0.mp4 So Far my best Times are: Motor only: 6.44 1/8 @ 104.13 10.39 1/4 @ 125.83 Nitrous Times: 5.785 1/8 @ 118.65 with a 1.336 60ft 9.168 1/4 @ 142.58 with a 250 shot dead out of the hole!

02-02-2004, 02:53 PM	#9
Alvin Never Done? Join Date: May 2000 Location: Ohio Posts: 1,435	I love how everyone is complaining that this thing doesn't have at least 500hp. It's a retractable hard-top roadster pick up, that's why it's expensive! Not to mention, not too long ago, 290 hp was a lot I think it is a great vehicle. It is a good exercise in design, and I think it will be the same for Chevrolet as the Prowler was for Plymouth/Chrysler. It's a decent powered, extreme styled vehicle for the few who can afford it. And just like the Prowler, bolt a supercharger or nitrous onto it, and you've got your performance too. __________________ Ethel - The Legend Continues... Ethel has been sold.

02-02-2004, 03:09 PM	#10
CPNE Resident Curmudgeon Join Date: Dec 1999 Location: NH Posts: 6,662	I like it but I wouldn't buy it if I were in the market for a "truck". That statement should give you some insight as to how I voted. __________________ Currently on or near the homestead: 67 Chevy SWB 2WD stepside 350/3 on tree (Pat's) 67 GMC SWB 2WD Fleet 402/auto (Brian's under construction) 67 Chevy 3/4 ton 2WD 402/auto (Business Hauler) 67 Chevy 1 ton dually 2WD 396/4 speed (Former business hauler, Needs TLC) 68 Chevy 1/2 ton Suburban 2WD 250 six/3 on tree (Brian's Needs TLC) 70 Chevy 3/4 ton 4WD 350/4 speed (Pat's - Disguised as a 68 GMC) 71 Chevy SWB stepside (Crushed by tree - parts donor) 72 Chevy 3/4 ton 4WD (Parts donor) 72 Chevy 3/4 ton 4WD Suburban (Parts Donor) 72 GMC 3/4 ton 4WD 292 six/4 speed (Mine - Disguised as a 67 GMC) 81 GMC 4WD Dually Dump Body 350/4 speed (Business Hauler) 82 Camaro Z/28 355/Super T-10 (Pat's toy) 93 Caprice 9C1 (Brian's Cop Car) 02 Toyota Camry (Reliable but a souless steel and plastic hulk) 2011 2SS RS Camaro M6 Factory Hurst Shifter Maybe I need to sell some of this crap Yet another Bozo with a sawz-all

02-02-2004, 03:45 PM	#11
70ChevyLongbed Howzit?!? Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Maryville, TN Posts: 1,265	I just saw one on the road Saturday, I think it's kinda cool, but way too small for me... and I wouldn't buy one. It looks like it would fit in the bed of my truck I'm glad Chevy is showing what they can make, like Alvin said, but I don't like the price. JMHO __________________ Jason Hawaiian-J 70 Longbed, 307, Edelbrock Carb 1404, Edelbrock Intake 2101, Dual Roller Timing chain and gears, 214/214 cam, Comp Roller Rockers, dual Flowmasters. 1999 Chevy Tahoe 2004 Mini Cooper S 71 BMW 2002 - Sold

02-02-2004, 06:42 PM	#12
smitty62 Registered User Join Date: May 2002 Location: North Carolina Posts: 1,234	I think GM as well as other US manufacturers--(is there such a thing left?) are missing the boat big time. If you look at automobile history, the vehicles that made it to big sales and lasted more than 2-3 years are the simple designs. Ie; VW, pre-WW2 Chevys, Model T and A's, early Mustangs, Camaros and Novas, etc. No silly gadgetry or wierd design that costs too much to build. No elaborate sound systems that you didn't want but have to pay for, no cup holders, weird paint jobs etc,. etc. If the customer wants this stuff---and some of it, I confess, I do too, then the rodders and aftermarket will take care of that--the manufacturer should build a good, solid, basic machine that performs, handles, stops and has an esthetic shape. As it is, the mfgrs. are building in all this stuff so they can get the cup holder money instead of the aftermarket vendors. I don't NEED or want these people deciding what I should have in a car! Bring back the 1st gen. SBC Camaro with the necessary updates like airbags, etc. but with improved seats and suspension and they will sell--forget the SSRs!!! AMEN! Thank you, thank you, thank you.......... Attached Images __________________ Stepsides look like real trucks! Smitty Last edited by smitty62; 02-02-2004 at 06:45 PM.

02-02-2004, 11:36 PM	#14
Gordo Registered User Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: Killingworth, CT. USA Posts: 3,378	I like it! I just wish it was in my price range. If it was 10K cheaper I would consider buying one and keep my S10 for the dirty work. __________________ 1971 C10 swb stepside 350/700R4/3.73posi (retired as of 4/22/03) 1998 S10 short bed 2002 S10 Blazer 1942 Oldsmobile 1958 Massey Harris Pony 1951 Wife Killingworth, Connecticut May those who love us, love us, any of those who do not love us, may God turn their hearts. And if God is unable to turn their hearts, may he turn their ankles so we may know them by their limping. A man who works with his hands is a laborer; a man who works with his hands and his brain is a craftsman; but a man who works with his hands and his brain and his heart is an artist.

02-03-2004, 12:36 AM	#15
krue Designated A-hole! Join Date: Mar 2003 Location: South Mississippi Posts: 36,448	Looks like fun, but I'll never own one! __________________ "If it ain't broke, fix it 'til it is!" Being stupid ain't illegal. We're Still Debt Free Except for the House!!! www.daveramsey.com 70 GMC SWB Stepside project "Green Booger" soon to be 6.0l/4l80e 93 S-10 "Poppaw's Truck"

02-03-2004, 01:05 AM	#16
bumpster Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Stillwater, Oklahoma Posts: 63	As a die hard chevy fan, I really hate to say this, but it does kind of look like a PT pickup. Of course I'm the one that said the new body style of the 1967 chevy I first saw in a founders day parade was ugly and would never catch on, now I have 3 and wish I had 30. Shows what little I knew huh? __________________ 72 C10 10 yr.daily driver 68 C10 18 yr.money pit 72 Nova all original 99 H.D. Heritage[sanity check] 71 VW topless bug[summer fun] "When I have the money, I don't have the time ; when I have the time, I don't have the money.



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

02-03-2004, 01:12 AM	#17
weasel29gm SLOW BUT SURE,BUT CLOSER Join Date: Feb 2002 Location: eleanor wv usa Posts: 3,096	I like em' and if had the $$$$ I'd own one!!!!!!! __________________ 69 C-10, OWNED 38YRS... 350 over 30, 350 Turbo, 3:73 Posi P/S, P/B Black with red and black int. ''LOVE THESE OLD ''TRUCKS.......

02-03-2004, 01:23 AM	#18
FRENCHBLUE72 PROJECT 7DEUCE Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: GRANTS PASS OR Posts: 21,606	I think they are gonna be another lincoln blackwood...Just my 2 cent's worth.. But I do think they are trick looking.. __________________ GO BIG GREEN GO DUCKS MEMBER #6377 72 k-5 daily driver 6'' lift 35'' 350-350-205 slowly getting rust free. Project "7DEUCE" check out my build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=267665 Tim Powell..R.I.P EastSideLowlife..... R.I.P..

02-03-2004, 01:54 AM	#19
smitty62 Registered User Join Date: May 2002 Location: North Carolina Posts: 1,234	HGS You think Taurus, Camry, Lumina, etc are the kind of cars I was talking about? You think that they are a good, basic, well handling, beautiful car? I don't think so!! Either I didn't express myself well or you need to read my comments again! You think those cars are comparable to a '69 Z-28? Or a 442? Never in your lifetime will those plastic tu*ds you mentioned ever approach their value either economically or sentimentally. __________________ Stepsides look like real trucks! Smitty

02-03-2004, 03:58 AM	#20
dtlilly Account Suspended Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Shadow of Lambeau Field Posts: 5,597	I love the look, but not the size. They will be a fad vehicle for the select few to be able to afford the $10K over list they will demand.

02-03-2004, 04:05 AM	#21
minitruck_freq Registered User Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Ottumwa, IA Posts: 48	GM should have put the 572 in them. __________________ minitrucker with a fullsize. stock sucks!!! 95 Chevy 1/2 ton 2wd under construction 92 Chevy 1/2 ton 4x4 (my beater) 00 Chevy 1/2 ton 4x4 (wife's truck)

02-03-2004, 08:52 AM	#22
gmcnorton Registered User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Middleport, Pa. 17953 Posts: 737	very cool i'm pretty sure there will be one in my garage within a year.......having a tough time not running out right now to buy one. want to wait to see if any short term problems with them first. gotta get one ............. I WONDER IF THEY WILL PUT A GMC EMBLEM ON ANY OF THEY????????? __________________ 70 GMC SHORT STEP , 71 BLAZER ,72 JIMMY,72 BLAZER, JUST NEED THAT SUBURBAN NOW......WANTING MORE

02-03-2004, 11:14 AM	#23
superchevy Got big-block? Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: Austin, Texas Posts: 2,453	Fuuuuuugly! Please don't call them the "new El Camino"...my Sprint's are crying at the thought. SC __________________ '68 CST SWB factory 396/T400 buddy buckets, a/c, ps, pb '72 Corvette convertible 454/4spd/ac, ps, pb '73 GMC Sierra Grande short wide 454/T400 ps, pb, ac '77 K5 Blazer black on red, 350/T350/NP205 ps, pb, ac all original '78 GMC Sierra Classic short wide 454/T400 ps, pb, ac '72 GMC Sprint SP454. 1 of 38 built. '73 GMC Sprint SP454. 1 of 71 built. '75 GMC Sprint SP454. 1 of 25 built. SOLD! '72 GMC K25 4x4 468/4L80e/NP205 build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...23#post4324423 SOLD!'55 Chevy gasser 496/4spd build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...96#post4324396

02-03-2004, 03:48 PM	#24
spencra This, is my BOOMSTICK! Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Berlin, CT Posts: 1,310	I really like them. I remember seeing an article on it a few years ago when it was just a concept car. I remember thinking that if Chevy ever does make it that I would be the first in line to buy one. That was of course before I read the estimated going price for them. That is just plain nuts what they are asking for them but I think I remember seeing that this thing has an engine on steroids in it or something. I think that I like them alot because I am a huge fan of th 47-53 chevy models which I believe the concept came from. __________________ Larry Got rid of my projects for now. 1980 Jeep CJ7 1998 Nissan Sentra (my car) 2001 Toyota Sienna (wife's, of course)

02-03-2004, 08:34 PM	#25
NGN Registered User Join Date: Nov 2001 Location: Old Bridge,NJ Posts: 838	I think it looks somewhat like an el-camino from the forty's - fifty's. I do like them but, for that price I'd get the SS Silverado. I agree with Smitty62 98%, but instead of airbags......improved kick@$$ a/c with no loss of hp.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.