92 S10 -> 65 c10 - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

Crazy Rusty · 01-30-2016, 03:00 AM

CL ad just popped on a great deal on a 92 s10 without engine or tranny. I know you can grab suspension/brakes off of a 73-87 but can't seem to find what is different about the early 90s stuff. Anyone know if the stuff from the 92 would be usable on my 65?

**PGSigns** · 01-30-2016, 10:12 AM

Well none of the S10 stuff ever fit. The 73 to 87 C10 stuff will bolt in. So the S10 is not a source for parts.
Jimmy

T.W.Dustin · 01-30-2016, 10:34 AM

I have to agree w/ PGSigns. S10 pickups are a much smaller geometry with shorter wheel base (and narrower). They are also much lighter duty. While there are a number of folks using S10 complete chassis as a base for street rods, I can't imagine using anything from one in a full sized half ton truck, with the exception of the Borg Warner T5 transmission (if it has one).

Crazy Rusty · 01-30-2016, 10:54 AM

Ok, thanks. I saw mentions of S10 swaps on a few forums but they all were cab swaps for racing and whatnot, that must be about all people do.

01-30-2016, 03:00 AM	#1
Crazy Rusty Registered User Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Tacoma, WA Posts: 176	92 S10 -> 65 c10 CL ad just popped on a great deal on a 92 s10 without engine or tranny. I know you can grab suspension/brakes off of a 73-87 but can't seem to find what is different about the early 90s stuff. Anyone know if the stuff from the 92 would be usable on my 65? __________________ 1965 C10 Longbed Stepside 1969 Chevelle Malibu 1962 C20 Fleetside - Build Thread (Sold before I could finish)

01-30-2016, 10:12 AM	#2
PGSigns Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Location: Hayes Va Posts: 4,569	Re: 92 S10 -> 65 c10 Well none of the S10 stuff ever fit. The 73 to 87 C10 stuff will bolt in. So the S10 is not a source for parts. Jimmy __________________ 60 to 66 Chevy and GMC window decals http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=661131 Good friends, good food and a hotrod what else do you need? 1966 BBW long fleet Daily driver 1965 BBW short fleet Sold and going to a good home 1965 Suburban 2003 3500 Duramax 2005 Ultra Classic

01-30-2016, 10:34 AM	#3
T.W.Dustin Registered User Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Overgaard, AZ Posts: 198	Re: 92 S10 -> 65 c10 I have to agree w/ PGSigns. S10 pickups are a much smaller geometry with shorter wheel base (and narrower). They are also much lighter duty. While there are a number of folks using S10 complete chassis as a base for street rods, I can't imagine using anything from one in a full sized half ton truck, with the exception of the Borg Warner T5 transmission (if it has one). __________________ Please Watch for Motorcycles

01-30-2016, 10:54 AM	#4
Crazy Rusty Registered User Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Tacoma, WA Posts: 176	Re: 92 S10 -> 65 c10 Ok, thanks. I saw mentions of S10 swaps on a few forums but they all were cab swaps for racing and whatnot, that must be about all people do. __________________ 1965 C10 Longbed Stepside 1969 Chevelle Malibu 1962 C20 Fleetside - Build Thread (Sold before I could finish)

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.