01-08-2017, 02:30 PM | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
Posts: 83
|
bumperets
my question i have is which bumperets did they use on a 70 gmc use are they tall or the short ones?
|
01-08-2017, 02:31 PM | #2 |
Roadtrip!
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Grand Rapids MN
Posts: 13,764
|
Re: bumperets
I think 67-70 were short.
__________________
67 gmc custom lwb dakota truck. Sold...And bought back 69 swb 4x4 project (in progress) 70 c-10 lwb texas truck 70 4x4/BB/bkts/posi/tach(retired) 70 swb (wifes) 70 jimmy camper 71 K-5 factory 2wd 71 cheyenne 4x4/tach/posi/ plow rig 71 Cheyenne20 BB, buckets, tach, tilt, 4 speed 72 jimmy CST wyoming rig 72 jimmy Colorado rig 72 lifted texas 4x4 3/4 ton burb 65 fury conv. 383/auto 65 chrysler 300 "L" 413 auto |
01-08-2017, 04:48 PM | #3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
Posts: 83
|
Re: bumperets
i thought that was the one used 1970 trucks trying to stay factory . thankyou
|
01-08-2017, 05:19 PM | #4 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,852
|
Re: bumperets
Too Much is right. instructions that came with them had them placed wide, outside the frame rails requiring new holes. These weren't factory, they were GM accessories and people put them where they wanted and since the next year the tall style came out, many owners bought those. Figure a '70 was only a year old and many would put them on after that first year and might have wanted the newer look. I like the older ones on the newer trucks, personally.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ Last edited by special-K; 01-08-2017 at 11:14 PM. |
01-08-2017, 07:55 PM | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Regina, Saskatchewan
Posts: 83
|
Re: bumperets
i agree special k i like the short ones also cleaner look
|
01-08-2017, 11:17 PM | #6 |
Special Order
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,852
|
Re: bumperets
Yeah, low profile and all chrome. The line is drawn between old style and modern style between the two. The 67-70s are linked to the guards used on cars since way back. The 71/72s (and up) with rubber are what came next and years beyond
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
01-09-2017, 02:23 AM | #7 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Posts: 7,423
|
Re: bumperets
Quote:
For the benefit of the new kids: We would push a car or truck with a low batt or KO'd starter up to 15-20 MPH, the front driver would wave his hand when he thought he had enough momentum, you'd hit the brakes and he'd drop the clutch and step on the gas, turning the engine over in 2nd, switches on. Usually it worked. If it didn't, they had worse problems that a dead battery or shot starter. Now, of course, there's Uber, I guess.
__________________
Every 25 years I like to rebuild that 292, whether it needs it or not. Last edited by '68OrangeSunshine; 01-09-2017 at 02:29 AM. |
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|