06-30-2004, 03:29 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 207
|
PCV valve question...
Is it wrong to not have the PCV valve routed to the carb? I just have both valve covers vented with the filter type caps.
I asked this question in the engine forum, in a reply to someone elses question, but it never got answered. |
06-30-2004, 03:58 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Alexandria, VA
Posts: 1,534
|
It's perfectly fine to just vent the crankcase to the atmosphere, that's how it was done before the advent of emission controls. However, you may have to adhere to state and local emissions laws. Depending on what year your vehicle is, it may not have been originally equipped with PCV. As far as engine performance and mileage are concerned, the PCV offers no advantages. JMO
__________________
'72 GMC SWB C1500 Custom, frame-off in progress. 383 SBC, 9:1CR, Comp Cams XE262H, Scat internal balanced crank, Eagle SIR 6" rods, Keith Black dish pistons, Dart Iron Eagle 72/180 heads, Weiand Stealth intake, Stewart stage I water pump, Holley 4bbl vac sec, TH350 with B&M Shift Improver Kit. 12 bolt positraction. |
06-30-2004, 04:00 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 207
|
Thats what I needed. Thanks!
Nick |
06-30-2004, 04:05 PM | #4 |
just can't cover up my redneck
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 11,414
|
You will eventually get an oil film on everything behind it, in the path of the airflow. The PCV valve will allow this vapor to be burned and therefore not run/drip on your engine. There is no performance advantage nor disadvantage and using one will keep you engine bay cleaner.
Not all progress is bad...... |
06-30-2004, 04:28 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 207
|
Thanks Longhair.
I spend more time wiping everything down on this truck than I do acually driving it. So, I don't think that will be an issue |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|