The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-26-2005, 06:08 PM   #1
RicksTrucks
Senior Member
 
RicksTrucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Claremore, OK 74017
Posts: 2,640
283 motor

Any value in a 283 that hasn't been run in 2 years but turns freely. I think I can get it for under $100 and didn't know if that would be worth it or not.
__________________
68 Short Stepside C-10
69 SWB C-10
70 Flatbed C-20
70 LWB C-20 BB402
70 LWB C-10 CST
70 LWB C-10 CST
71 Short Stepside Cheyenne C-10
72 LWB C-10
72 Blazer 4x4 4spd
95 Jeep Cherokee 4x4
RicksTrucks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2005, 06:13 PM   #2
Long Roof
Old School, New Style
 
Long Roof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Monroeville, Ohio
Posts: 790
My pops had a 283 in a malibu. The engine screemed and you could not blow it up, believe me I tried (damn kids), It would float the valves. Not much HP or TQ but it ran great.

Aaron
__________________
The Good:
- 72 GMC Jimmy 4x4 - 307 cid / 350 th
- 70 Chevy Suburban 1/2T 2wd - 454 cid /400 th
- 96 Chevy Impala SS - mainly stock
- 98 Chevy Tahoe LT 4x4 - all stock
The Bad:
- 86 Chevy Suburban 1/2T 4x4 - winter beater
The Ugly:
- 72 Chevy Suburban 1/2T 2wd - parts truck
Long Roof is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2005, 06:22 PM   #3
CHEVYE
my gas saver
 
CHEVYE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Clarksville, TN
Posts: 2,046
my first 67-72 was a 67 short stepper with a 283 and 3spd on the floor "converted" i could tach it up to 8 grand all of the time and it wouldn't blow. i would float the valves so bad sometimes that it would stutter for a minute and stall. i'd give it a minute and it would fire right up and go on about it's business. 283 and 327's are one of the best engines i've ever owned. i don't know if i'd sink alot of $$$ into building the 283. if it runs it is well worth it.
__________________
85' SWB, 4.3/TH350, getting ready for paint
84`SWB, 462ci./TH400, cowl hood, 15" billet spec., flows, blazer buckets/console, flat black
71`SWB, project
ebay feedback
CHEVYE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2005, 06:26 PM   #4
Randy70C-10
Account Suspended
 
Randy70C-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia Beach, Va. U.S.A.
Posts: 15,320
Yes, it's well worth the money. They are getting harder to come by, I had four of them at one time and wish that I had kept at least two of them. Like said, they will run forever!!
Randy70C-10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2005, 06:44 PM   #5
tomatocity
Registered User
 
tomatocity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Sacramento CA
Posts: 1,255
A 283, a small carb, light in weight vehicle, and you have a $3.00 a gallon DD.
__________________
Got bored, sold everthing. Got bored, looking for a 1960-66 C-10. Want to build my last truck.
tomatocity is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-26-2005, 07:08 PM   #6
Ironhorse
Senior Member
 
Ironhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Wellington, Ks
Posts: 10,285
I have a '64 Chevelle 283 block in my '57 2dr sedan. Running stock '57 dual four set up (Carter WCFB carbs) and a Muncie M-21 4 speed. Hyd. cam and 3:55 rear gears. VERY quick and respectable on the street. Have to agree with the statement of the 283 and 327 engines being some of the best ones ever built. That short stroke on the 283 gives RPM's really quick. Considered "old school" by today's standards but then, so am I !
__________________
1971 Chevy 1/2T 4x4 LWB 350 V-8
Was sm465-now 350TH/np205
Tilt, Tach, Towhooks
Original Truck AM/FM
Wellington, Ks
Ironhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2005, 11:10 AM   #7
tkeduk8r
Senior Member
 
tkeduk8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Alexandria, MN
Posts: 1,462
i just put a 305 and 2004r in my 74 C10 DD and since i didnt build the engine i have toyed with the idea of a mild 283 bottom end, and 305 heads in front of an 200 or 700 4r, for a nice dd truck that should get around 20 mpg highway if tuned right... id scoop on it for 100 bucks... keep in mind that that most of the early heads dont have accessory bolt holes so you may have to score later heads...
--Mike
__________________
63 C20 2WD, 230/SM420/4.11 73K
68 C30 dump truck, 327,SM425,4.56 66K original
68 C10 2WD SWB Stepper, 250/3-tree/3.73 66K.... Wifes
68 Buick Skylark Custom Conv., 350/TH400/2.56 In our family since '79
69 GMC 1500 SWB 2WD, 350/TH350/3.73 posi...
70 K10 SWB 4X4 4-sp,ps, pb, tilt, buckets, console, sliding back window (Need AC parts) WIP
72 Chevy K20 4x4 350/350/205/4.56 donor
72 Vette 350/M21/3.70 posi, triple black and super fast
84 Olds Cutlass Brougham 350/2004r/4.11 was Dad's
tkeduk8r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2005, 11:49 AM   #8
Rollie396
someday it will be done!
 
Rollie396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lloydminster,AB. Canada
Posts: 1,620
I can't say enough good things about the 283,I had the same engine in both of my first two vehicles (68 imp,66 1/2 ton with granny gears) and it survived all I could throw at it.
__________________
'72 C-10 Proud owner of a million new and used pieces that used to be and will once again be(god willing) a testament to the term "they don't build em like that anymore.
'80 LWB 2wd beater
'67 GMC long fleet (cab donor)
'66 long step (parked till it's turn comes around)
'65 short step (parts truck that will donate it's bed and possibly frame to the '66)
'06 Grand Prix wife's car (she hardly lets me touch it)
my pics
Rollie396 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2005, 11:50 AM   #9
cadiac
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wichita, Kansas 67212
Posts: 257
Rick -if you want another, when your up here, I know where one is out of a 61 Impala that can be had for probably that much and it runs. I drove one 5 years in a 66 pickup. Great little engine. I have one in a 61 Belair, but it will be leaving if I ever finish that car.
cadiac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2005, 05:41 PM   #10
stllookn
Saving 1 truck at a time!
 
stllookn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 6,465
Got one in my '67 stepside...just keeps on running and it still has 145 psi compression.
__________________
'68 C20 Longhorn 50th Anniversary 400/TH400
'68 C20 Longhorn 50th Anniversary 468/TH400w/buckets
'72 C20 Halfhorn (Longhorn w/o cab and front clip)
'69 Flxible Cruiser (look up ugly in the dictionary)
stllookn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2005, 09:11 PM   #11
FormerMember
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,051
This is good to hear. I just picked up a 68 K20 with a good running 283. I bought the truck for the front clip. Compression is a pretty steady 153psi.

All of my current ventures will be BBC.
FormerMember is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-27-2005, 09:47 PM   #12
69 longhorn
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: rock island,il,usa
Posts: 5,382
I still have a "virgin" '64 block, & 2 standard/standard steel cranks, & 1 extra set of 327sj rods packed in grease......just caint afford the blower to go on top, so i can cut a hole in the hood, & stuff it in my longhorn. 283's were born to rev, i could not kill the last 1, even after 100,000 mi of abuse......good stuff Maynerd L
__________________
http://community.webshots.com/user/hotrodhorn
69 longhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com