The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-11-2005, 01:25 PM   #1
milehightoyz
AttentionDeficitDisorder
 
milehightoyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: COLORADO
Posts: 600
Crossmember notch or Crossember drop?

Sorry if this has been asked before but I could not find a thread on it. Ive seen a few threads on 1.5" xmember drops and Ive notice some people such as captkaos will section and drop the entire top of the crossmember down an 1.5":



And some such as fastbagged68, and phantom dually, have only notched the area where the framerails will sit recessed.



is there any preference as to which is a better way to go? what are the differences? the only difference I can see offhand is motor placement but that can be addressed fairly simply with diff motor mounts. I know that fastbagged and phantom both are going with custom built LCA's is this coincidental or necessary when doing it that way? Any info would be greatly appreciated.
milehightoyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2005, 05:13 PM   #2
XXL
Seņor Member
 
XXL's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Edge of the world
Posts: 5,367
Quote:
Originally Posted by milehightoyz
Sorry if this has been asked before but I could not find a thread on it. Ive seen a few threads on 1.5" xmember drops and Ive notice some people such as captkaos will section and drop the entire top of the crossmember down an 1.5":



And some such as fastbagged68, and phantom dually, have only notched the area where the framerails will sit recessed.



is there any preference as to which is a better way to go? what are the differences? the only difference I can see offhand is motor placement but that can be addressed fairly simply with diff motor mounts. I know that fastbagged and phantom both are going with custom built LCA's is this coincidental or necessary when doing it that way? Any info would be greatly appreciated.
The first method is a bolt-in swap (except for steering linkage issues in some cases). The second requires modifying the motor mounts and sometimes the oil pan. The work required to do the first method is not significantly more than the second, so I see no advantage to doing it as in the second. (BTW, I'm biased. captkaos did my xmember.)
XXL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2005, 07:01 PM   #3
milehightoyz
AttentionDeficitDisorder
 
milehightoyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: COLORADO
Posts: 600
Hi XXL, thanks for the reply. i understand that in the second method the motor would move up 1.5" with the xmember which may cause firewall clearance issues with the distributer. but it seems that with the first method you would have the problem of the oil pan hanging down 1.5" lower then the xmember after it was sectioned out?? the second method seems like alot less cutting and welding. also why would the second method not be a bolt in swap as well? thanks in advanced for the info.
milehightoyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2005, 07:47 PM   #4
DM310
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 256
Well are you only doing the x member mod or are you going to Z the frame too? I would say the first one is the easiest
__________________
66 C10 (under construction)
1.5" crossmember drop
2" Z'ed frame
8" rear notch
Watts-link
Bagged
DJM 3" spindles
DM310 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2005, 10:40 PM   #5
a squarecan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 232
I am glad some one brought this back up cause I was going to ask cause I know it has been talked about before but I could not find it either. Crossmember number 2 looks easier but you will need to modify the engine and tranny mounts. Which doesn't have to be a big deal, but it is an extra step. But I will be intrested to see how this thread turns out.

Keith
a squarecan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-11-2005, 11:38 PM   #6
fastbagged68
Registered User
 
fastbagged68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Tri Valley California
Posts: 792
If you do it like #1 you can not do custom lower control arms like mine. #1 is easier then what I did. Your motor mounts will work out fine. Only issue is steering column hitting upper control arm. My crossmember is a little over kill for someone that doesn't want to lay body. With my suburban aired out my control arm and my crossmember are off the ground about an inch or maybe a little less.
fastbagged68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 12:03 AM   #7
a squarecan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 232
So I am curious if you plan on using the stock A-arms which is an easier/better fix? I know that both may not fit into same catergory, but I am just trying to figure out the best route to go. I had planned to go the route of number 1, but then number also looked like a good idea.

Keith
a squarecan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 03:17 PM   #8
Captkaos
www.73-87chevytrucks.com
 
Captkaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,935
I am biased, but my setup eliminates all the problems associated with the notch'd version except for the steering which is going to happen however you do it.

The custom lower control arms fastbagged68'd use was setup by the same company that did his crossmember. They aren't applicable for any other setup.

ANY aftermarket control arms either dropped or not will work with my setup. XXL is running Air Rides Strong arms on his. I had stock ones on mine.
__________________
Chris Lucas
1973 Chevy C-10
1978 GMC Jimmy (2WD) - SOLD
1987 R10 twin turbo LS
1991 R3500 SRW CrewCab
1985 K5 diesel swapped project
1989 K5 2WD conversion w/ Vette susp Project
Captkaos Customs
73-87chevytrucks.com
Captkaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 05:11 PM   #9
fastbagged68
Registered User
 
fastbagged68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Tri Valley California
Posts: 792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Captkaos
The custom lower control arms fastbagged68'd use was setup by the same company that did his crossmember. They aren't applicable for any other setup.
The custom control arms are Bill Turner with modifactions done to them. I did the crossmember. It has a 2 inch drop. I can make those arms too!
fastbagged68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 05:15 PM   #10
Captkaos
www.73-87chevytrucks.com
 
Captkaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,935
My bad, I thought I read/remembered that Bill made them for you and you sent the crossmember to him also.
__________________
Chris Lucas
1973 Chevy C-10
1978 GMC Jimmy (2WD) - SOLD
1987 R10 twin turbo LS
1991 R3500 SRW CrewCab
1985 K5 diesel swapped project
1989 K5 2WD conversion w/ Vette susp Project
Captkaos Customs
73-87chevytrucks.com
Captkaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 05:53 PM   #11
a squarecan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 232
Hey Fastbagged,

do you have any pix of your LCA's?

Also how did you manage to get 2 inches out of your cross member drop? I have heard if you go over 1.5 inches you run into more serious issues then just steering.

Thanks
Keith
a squarecan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 06:02 PM   #12
Captkaos
www.73-87chevytrucks.com
 
Captkaos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Birmingham, AL
Posts: 6,935
He went 2" and used a rack & pinion setup, which will solve those issues.
__________________
Chris Lucas
1973 Chevy C-10
1978 GMC Jimmy (2WD) - SOLD
1987 R10 twin turbo LS
1991 R3500 SRW CrewCab
1985 K5 diesel swapped project
1989 K5 2WD conversion w/ Vette susp Project
Captkaos Customs
73-87chevytrucks.com
Captkaos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 07:47 PM   #13
a squarecan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 232
OOOOH,

That answers that question, sounds like your way is best Chris unless I would be going with rack and pinion.

Thanks I am going to start measuring things out and take it out to the plasma this weekend hopefully lol.

Keith
a squarecan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2005, 10:40 PM   #14
milehightoyz
AttentionDeficitDisorder
 
milehightoyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: COLORADO
Posts: 600
i dont know why but i decided on 3.5" z, i was originally gonna do a 3" and save the 1-1.5" xmember drop in case i still wasnt happy with the height. then as i was setting it up i said "ahh what the hell, another .5" aint gonna hurt." seems like a 3.5" z maybe somewhat of a happy medium as ive seen alot of info that confirms that 3.5" total will do the trick (2"z and 1.5"xmemberdrop) at any rate. i will keep anyone posted on updates as it comes together. also, im doing a 78 2wd blazer frame i dont know if there are any differences then truck frames. there seemed to be a slight curve inwards to the frame rails where i cut and z'd on the area i had to fish plate that noone else mentioned. maybe i cut too far forward? i didnt have the body on the frame yet so eyeballed it kinda going buy the pics on loweredd.com's website.

Last edited by milehightoyz; 09-12-2005 at 10:42 PM.
milehightoyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 01:50 AM   #15
Jaredm82
Active Member
 
Jaredm82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ca
Posts: 211
I did mine 2.5" and raised my steering the same. Works perfectly
Jaredm82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 06:42 PM   #16
milehightoyz
AttentionDeficitDisorder
 
milehightoyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: COLORADO
Posts: 600
any info or pics on what you did to raise your steering? thank john
milehightoyz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 07:22 PM   #17
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,977
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jaredm82
I did mine 2.5" and raised my steering the same. Works perfectly
Could you elaborate?
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 09:07 PM   #18
Jaredm82
Active Member
 
Jaredm82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ca
Posts: 211
well, you drill new holes 2.5" higher than the origninal ones, then notch the frame were the idler arm and steering arm need clearance to move.
Jaredm82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2005, 09:59 PM   #19
a squarecan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 232
Hey Jared any problems you ran into with it? Has it been road tested? And Also is 2.5 inches enough to tuck the LCA's up enough to lay frame?

Thanks
Keith
a squarecan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2005, 05:20 PM   #20
Jaredm82
Active Member
 
Jaredm82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ca
Posts: 211
no problems what so ever. Ya I drove it for over a year after I got it done. I just recently tore it apart and lowered the body mounts down.
Jaredm82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2005, 05:36 PM   #21
Jaredm82
Active Member
 
Jaredm82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ca
Posts: 211
http://www.fullsizechevy.com/forums/...d.php?t=165800 thats the best i can do for pics right now
Jaredm82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2005, 08:01 PM   #22
a squarecan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 232
Thanks for the info and pix Jared!

I just wanted to make sure it held up well because I plan on making my truck a daily driver. Good to hear you haven't had any problems! My 3" drop spindles are suppose to be arriving some time this evening so I will mock everything up with the drop spindles and find out exactly how much of that cross member I need to cut away.

It looks like you just made the frame rail taller where the box is, do you think if I "z" the frame where the box is would it be strong enough?

Thanks
Keith
a squarecan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2005, 08:15 PM   #23
Jaredm82
Active Member
 
Jaredm82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ca
Posts: 211
Actually, thats basically what I did. It's hard to explain, but I sliced the side of the frame and kept the bottom part, rasied the side section up, welded it back together and then welded the 2 inch peice on top to make it look like a factory bend. Make sense? Ill try and get some pics of the inside of the frame and it will explain everything! Also, yes, my a arms do sit up above the frame line by about 1/4 to 1/2" or so? I cant remember, but now my body is lower than my frame line so I can tell you for sure. I feel like I never make sense on these forums... Sorry
Jaredm82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2005, 08:17 PM   #24
Jaredm82
Active Member
 
Jaredm82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ca
Posts: 211
Also, I have 3" djm spindles as well, and my tire size is 245/35/20. It barely lays on a 265/30/22 too...
Jaredm82 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2005, 08:56 PM   #25
a squarecan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 232
Thanks again Jared,

Makes sense! My DJM spindles just came through the door. Now I have to wait for the rest of the brake stuff to get here. I plan to run a 245/35/20 when I can afford it but for now I will probably just roll on 15's

PIx would be awesome if you get a chance.

Keith
a squarecan is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com