The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-03-2005, 08:43 PM   #1
raidermanny
Senior Member
 
raidermanny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fremont, Ca
Posts: 260
Front Coilovers from FatMan

I just finished putting on my IFS kit w/coilovers that I got from FatMan Fabrications. I have to say I love the polished stainless upper and lower tubular arms. Next weekend I'm going to install the rack and pinion steering so more pics to come.


raidermanny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2005, 08:47 PM   #2
FormerMember
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 3,051
That is very sweet. Does the fat man kit have provisions for the rack and pinion?

Got a link to this?
FormerMember is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2005, 09:09 PM   #3
raidermanny
Senior Member
 
raidermanny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fremont, Ca
Posts: 260
Yeah it all came together. Their website is www.fatmanfab.com They always have adds in classis trucks magazine.
raidermanny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2005, 09:30 PM   #4
cornutz
All Praise RANDY!!
 
cornutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Central California
Posts: 391
whats the deal with the crossmember? is it a direct bolt in? or weld in?

Looks sweet though!
cornutz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2005, 09:35 PM   #5
raidermanny
Senior Member
 
raidermanny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fremont, Ca
Posts: 260
It bolted right in. Just had to drill a few more holes in the frame.
raidermanny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-03-2005, 11:51 PM   #6
Redaddiction
LS1 Lover
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 474
That is really cool I thought about using corvette front suspension but I like that bolt on idea alot more
Redaddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2005, 12:39 AM   #7
cornutz
All Praise RANDY!!
 
cornutz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Central California
Posts: 391
what kind of drop in the front are you lookin at getting out of that? What is the $$$$ of that bad boy???
cornutz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2005, 12:40 AM   #8
Redaddiction
LS1 Lover
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 474
Quote:
Originally Posted by raidermanny
It bolted right in. Just had to drill a few more holes in the frame.
Do you use stock motor mounts ?
Redaddiction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2005, 12:49 AM   #9
raidermanny
Senior Member
 
raidermanny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fremont, Ca
Posts: 260
It should be between 4-5 inches but you can go lower if you get dropped spindles. The whole kit with s/h was $2800. A little more than I wanted to spend on my suspension but I really like the look. I just have to save a bit longer for my engine now.
You can use the stock mounts but you have to fab a spacer for them to work cause the new crossmember sits lower. They have tubular mounts available but they are weld in so I'm not sure if I can use them since I don't know how to weld.

Last edited by raidermanny; 10-04-2005 at 12:52 AM.
raidermanny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2005, 01:12 AM   #10
68LSS1
Registered User
 
68LSS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,191
Looks good, raidermanny. I too have the Stage III kit (couple pictures in link in sig). Interested to see how yours sits with the weight on the front end. I think I'm going to need different springs with the LS1 and fiberglass front end.
__________________
'68 Short Step
LS1/T56, Hydratech, Fatman Fabrications Stage III, Baer, Hot Rods to Hell, US Body, S&W, etc
68LSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2005, 02:15 AM   #11
raidermanny
Senior Member
 
raidermanny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fremont, Ca
Posts: 260
68LSS1 I'm glad I found someone else with this kit. I'm gonna be PMing you with some questions if you dont mind. I wanted the same rear kit that you have but thought it was a little to advanced for my skills.
raidermanny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2005, 03:20 AM   #12
68LSS1
Registered User
 
68LSS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,191
Quote:
Originally Posted by raidermanny
68LSS1 I'm glad I found someone else with this kit. I'm gonna be PMing you with some questions if you dont mind. I wanted the same rear kit that you have but thought it was a little to advanced for my skills.
Feel free. My email address is listed also. Is Fatman now welding the brace on the rear of the crossmember? The one that the bolt for the lower a-arm goes through? On mine it didn't come welded but it sounds like yours did.
__________________
'68 Short Step
LS1/T56, Hydratech, Fatman Fabrications Stage III, Baer, Hot Rods to Hell, US Body, S&W, etc
68LSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2005, 02:58 PM   #13
69 Short Fleet
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kelowna B.C. Canada
Posts: 1,086
Looks awesome Raidermanny!
68LSS1. Are you installing buckets on your truck? I want to do the T-56 upgrade but would like to retain my bench seat. The shifter linkage location might change my plans though... I didn't realize it was that far towards the rear of the cab. Doug
69 Short Fleet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2005, 05:28 AM   #14
68LSS1
Registered User
 
68LSS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,191
Yes I'm using buckets, benches don't work well with 5 point harnesses. Note that I have moved the engine as far back as I can and also it is possible to get a T56 with the shifter mounted on one of the forward pads (they actually have three different spots where it can be). Unfortunately as of now there are no kits to move the shifter, so you must buy the tranny with the shifter in the location you desire from someone like 5speedtransmissions.com (they sell 6 speeds also).
__________________
'68 Short Step
LS1/T56, Hydratech, Fatman Fabrications Stage III, Baer, Hot Rods to Hell, US Body, S&W, etc
68LSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2005, 03:25 AM   #15
69 Short Fleet
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Kelowna B.C. Canada
Posts: 1,086
^ Very cool! I noticed in the pic there was a square block off plate on top of the tranny (roughly in the center), that must be for the shifter if you decide to have it more forward. Thanks! That makes this upgrade a little easier. Doug
69 Short Fleet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2005, 11:08 AM   #16
FirstGen
Just Don't Stop!
 
FirstGen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,239
Any idea how much weight you are saving with that front end?
__________________
1968 C10 build in process
TT LSA/6L90e/9"
FirstGen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2005, 05:04 AM   #17
68LSS1
Registered User
 
68LSS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,191
No, we had a thread around the time when I first joined this forum with me weighing the Fatman stuff and others weighing the stock stuff but I never saved it.
__________________
'68 Short Step
LS1/T56, Hydratech, Fatman Fabrications Stage III, Baer, Hot Rods to Hell, US Body, S&W, etc
68LSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2005, 10:59 AM   #18
FRENCHBLUE72
PROJECT 7DEUCE
 
FRENCHBLUE72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: GRANTS PASS OR
Posts: 21,608
Very nice set-up ...
__________________
GO BIG GREEN GO DUCKS



MEMBER #6377

72 k-5 daily driver 6'' lift 35'' 350-350-205 slowly getting rust free.

Project "7DEUCE"

check out my build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=267665



Tim Powell..R.I.P EastSideLowlife..... R.I.P..
FRENCHBLUE72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2005, 01:34 AM   #19
raidermanny
Senior Member
 
raidermanny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fremont, Ca
Posts: 260
I would guess it saves about 175 lbs
raidermanny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2005, 10:16 AM   #20
FirstGen
Just Don't Stop!
 
FirstGen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,239
sure seems like alot. I guess it's possible though.
__________________
1968 C10 build in process
TT LSA/6L90e/9"
FirstGen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2005, 10:21 AM   #21
Joe67
67 is sold
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Troy, Michigan
Posts: 6,738
That looks great!!!
__________________
Joe - Formerly 67c10step
-------------------------------
1967 Chevy Stepside - ECE 4/6, fuelcell, 5lug - SOLD

gr8lakes - My ebay auctions

Click here to order forum apparel :: Click here to become a subscribing member
Joe67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2005, 02:32 PM   #22
68LSS1
Registered User
 
68LSS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Tampa
Posts: 1,191
Quote:
Originally Posted by FirstGen
sure seems like alot. I guess it's possible though.

I would of guessed about the same. I can pick up the crossmember with the a-arms and brakes on. Plus you loose the gear box or actually I guess it would be more correct to say that the rack and tie rods weigh less than the gearbox, tie rods and idler/pitman arm. Plus you should get about 5" of drop without dropped spindles.
__________________
'68 Short Step
LS1/T56, Hydratech, Fatman Fabrications Stage III, Baer, Hot Rods to Hell, US Body, S&W, etc
68LSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005, 07:28 PM   #23
raidermanny
Senior Member
 
raidermanny's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Fremont, Ca
Posts: 260
Here it is with the rack and pinion and sway bar on.

raidermanny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005, 08:16 PM   #24
Portmod7
Registered User
 
Portmod7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Aztec, NM
Posts: 388
Any idea what the rack is from? Mustang II or something else? Looks good. How bout the spindles and brakes? Thanks


Also, what size bolt is that going through the lower a-arm bushing? I wouldnt think a single-shear setup would work right there, wouldn't figure it would be strong enough. Must be though, or they would be breaking and Fatman would be in some trouble.

Last edited by Portmod7; 10-12-2005 at 08:22 PM.
Portmod7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2005, 08:31 PM   #25
tattoo
"Bondo, just say no!"
 
tattoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Barrie Ontario Canada
Posts: 75
man that setup looks sweet, worth every cent. so clean easy to work on. are they adjustable coil-overs?
__________________
"WORK NOW, SLEEP WHEN I'M DEAD, SPEND EVERY PENNY I MAKE"

69 C-10 SWB Stepside (ground up resto in progress)
86 Yugo
69 Honda pc50 moped
see my work @ http://www.myspace.com/inkorperated
free site for pics

Last edited by tattoo; 10-12-2005 at 08:56 PM.
tattoo is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com