The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-11-2002, 01:14 PM   #1
Mudder
Registered User
 
Mudder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: East Central, MO
Posts: 11,336
cast iron heads or aluminum?????

Looking at Dart heads or the Edlbrock aluminum heads for a driver. Wanting performance and no problems (dependable). Anyone have thoughts? Comments?
Mudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 01:44 PM   #2
68 with 350 TPI
Registered User
 
68 with 350 TPI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Wingate NC
Posts: 456
Nothing wrong with aluminum heads on a street car/truck.

The edelbrock heads have pretty thick decks and they should not warp.

Just think how many cars come with aluminum heads now.
__________________
Life is good with a 6-71 supercharged 355 in a 72 camaro
68 with 350 TPI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 01:48 PM   #3
Big69C20 Toy
Livin' it up.
 
Big69C20 Toy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Richland, MI
Posts: 2,212
Depends a lot on your price range, the aluminum is a bit more costly. I'd say go for the aluminum if you've got the money as you can kick your compression up some (if you're thinking that way). Get some good head studs and aluminum heads and you'd be great on that daily driver i'd think.
__________________
-Greg;
Sold the 69 C20. It's off to a better home with more love!
Now onto the 86 CUCV M1009; K5 blazer with 6.2L diesel, corp 10 bolt axles, Detroit locker in the rear, trutrac front, 3.73 gears, 35" tires.
Big69C20 Toy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 01:55 PM   #4
Randy70C-10
Account Suspended
 
Randy70C-10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Virginia Beach, Va. U.S.A.
Posts: 15,320
They weight alot less too!
For a daily driver, I'd use cast iron simply because of the price. Vortec heads seem to be the hot item lately and won't break the bank.

Last edited by Randy70C-10; 10-11-2002 at 02:02 PM.
Randy70C-10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 02:16 PM   #5
diggin69
Southern but in Ohio!!!!
 
diggin69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Eaton,Oh. 45320
Posts: 467
is it for a big or small block if you go with aluminum, have the block zero decked to gain compresion, also on aluminum make sure the push rods are .100 longer than stock, if you go with edelbrock- use the bolt kit #8550 & for others that have small-small blocks like the 262,265,283,305,307.... the aluminum heads cant be used do to not having a 4" bore unless you go with a cam smaller than .450 lift but there is nothing like the flow you can port & polish & gasket match steel & get to flow as good but who want to do the task, when you can buy them & drop some weight at the same time. are you building for bottom end, mid to low, or just a stump puller let me know I've been known to build some healthy mouses he,he I could help more if I knew what you were going for.
__________________
1969 C/10 3/4 ton 4x4 longbed custom, frame made from a 79
1972 custom-10 half/ton longbed
1980 1/2 ton 4x4 all original 350/350/205 with air
Eaton,Oh
rebelryder@hotmail.com
diggin69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 02:37 PM   #6
Mudder
Registered User
 
Mudder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: East Central, MO
Posts: 11,336
Vortecs

Just got off the phone with a guy from Scogggin Dickey. He's jsut about convinced me to go with the vortecs. Its a small block diggin in a 4x4.
Mudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 04:10 PM   #7
da-burb
"Ochre Ogre"
 
da-burb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Springfield, MN
Posts: 3,558
My next engine is going to have the iron Vortec's. I was considering the Edelbrock Performers or the E-tecs. But cost won out.
__________________

Bowtie Truck Stop Inc.
Mid-West GM Truck Restoration Parts Supplier
Your Key Parts, Auto Metal Direct, Dynacorn,
and Goodmark dealer.
like us @ www.facebook.com/BowtieTruckStop

1971 C-10 Suburban (Ochre)
1971 K-10 Suburban (Ochre)
1972 C-10 Suburban (Ochre)
1972 K-20 Suburban (Yellow- that just aint right!)

Springfield, Minnesota 56087
da-burb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 05:20 PM   #8
mikep
Used to have a truck
 
mikep's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: port orchard WA
Posts: 1,552
I'm not a big fan of aluminum . Ran the edelbrocks in a BB ford once and had to repair several stripped threads after the engine was torn down to change cams. Cast iron heads do everything aluminum heads do for less money and they dont warp or strip threads as easily plus you dont HAVE to up the compression to get the same power level .
__________________
No truck :-(
mikep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 05:21 PM   #9
MikeB
Senior Member
 
MikeB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: North Texas
Posts: 3,597
The Vortecs flow great, but they need a special intake manifold, late model valve covers and self-aligning rocker arms. The springs are limited to .450" lift (or .480", depending on who you listen to). Scoggin Dickey can help you with all this stuff. My 383 has 180cc Dart Iron Eagles but I can't recommend them over the Vortecs. On my next project I'll probably use the AFR 195s.
__________________
Mike
1969 C10 LWB -- owned for 35 years. 350/TH350, 3.08 posi, 1st Gen Vintage Air, recent AAW wiring harness, 5-lug conversion, 1985 spindles and brakes.
1982 C10 SWB -- sold
1981 C10 Silverado LWB -- sold, but wish I still had it!
1969 C10 (not the current one) that I bought in the early 1980s. Paid $1200; sold for $1500 a few years later. Just a hint at the appreciation that was coming.
Retired as a factory automation products salesman.
Worked part-time over the years for an engine builder and a classic car repair shop.
Member here for 24 years! This is the very first car/truck Internet forum I joined. I still used a dial-up modem back then!
MikeB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 05:50 PM   #10
crazy longhorn
Fabricate till you "puke"
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ill
Posts: 9,402
Im running Edelbrock rpm's on the longhorn, squeezin close to 10 to 1 on the ratio. I have no complaints, & I think a couple plusses......they will fit any off shelf sb intake, & cam selection is no problem, the springs are good to about .570 lift! The exhuast holes,& the rocker studs are helicoiled right out of the box......the intake bolt holes are not. Good luck.....crazy longhorn
crazy longhorn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 08:16 PM   #11
67shortie
Green club
 
67shortie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Central CA
Posts: 1,059
Quote:
Originally posted by mikep
plus you dont HAVE to up the compression to get the same power level .
Exactly, the only reason people should up the compression on aluminum headed engines is to regain combustion thermal efficiency. The aluminum has better heat transfer resulting in lower chamber temps equalling in less overall power. Remember heat equalls energy.
So for you guys opting for the aluminunum heads on your rides, ALL THINGS BEING EQUAL, prepare for less power after install because of this unless you up the compression ratio a point or two. Iorn will win out everytime on this subject.
Now, if the head you intall has better ports, better chamber design, etc. the power will go up in most cases but not because of higher cylinder temps but because of better flow and chamber design.
On a side note, there are coatings available one can put in the combustion chamber to keep the heat in so to speak. It is not in a rattle can, but there are a few companies that offer this service, they will also do pistons, bearings and valves. Kinda cool stuff
__________________
71 short/fleet ECE 4/6 drop, LQ4/700r4/3.42 gears
70 SS396 Chevelle 427/200-4R/3.73posi
61 Lincoln Continental, black on black

Son you are going to drive me to drinkin if you don't stop drivin that hot rod lincoln
67shortie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 08:52 PM   #12
RaTTrap 68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: N Utah
Posts: 12
Question

Not to detract from Mudders post.but i was also wondering the same:
Alum vs iron

How does this the choice differ if building a BBC vs. SBC?

As I will be building a 454 this winter along with a friends 454 of 75-77 vintage.we have come to an impass on of we should go alum or iron/we are wanting a good driver but able to hold its own at the track the 2-3 times we plan on going a month?

Thanks for any advice,and sorry if this is posting over mudders.Thought maybe this would help differ between BBC and SBC -alum vs iron choices?

RaTTrap 68
RaTTrap 68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 09:15 PM   #13
mikep
Used to have a truck
 
mikep's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: port orchard WA
Posts: 1,552
This might just be a matter of economics. Personally I'd have to say if your'e only running on the street then go with a decent set of early open chamber cast iron oval port big block heads. Since youu are talking about going to the track several times a month that is a different story. You probably want to go fast. I'd say go with aftermarket rectangular port heads. I only say that because by the time you buy chevy rectangular port heads, clean them up and have them rebuilt and ported you are into them as much as a decent set of Merlin cast irons or edelbrock aluminum heads. Again I have a preference for cast iron on a daily driver but since you are looking to go fast the aluminum might be more to your liking. For a daily driver I would never reccomend the rectangular port heads. Ive driven big port chevy heads and big port cleveland heads and for daily drivers they make life miserable.
__________________
No truck :-(
mikep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 11:29 PM   #14
67shortie
Green club
 
67shortie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Central CA
Posts: 1,059
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally posted by RaTTrap 68
Not to detract from Mudders post.but i was also wondering the same:
Alum vs iron

How does this the choice differ if building a BBC vs. SBC?

As I will be building a 454 this winter along with a friends 454 of 75-77 vintage.we have come to an impass on of we should go alum or iron/we are wanting a good driver but able to hold its own at the track the 2-3 times we plan on going a month?

Thanks for any advice,and sorry if this is posting over mudders.Thought maybe this would help differ between BBC and SBC -alum vs iron choices?

RaTTrap 68
Sorry mudder, we are hacking up your post in a major way
I do agree with Mike that rectangular heads are not the way to go with a driver big block. BUT.. I do have to disagree in a friendly way Mike on your suggestion of using the rectangular aluminum heads for the track. If you are after ET's =quicker 60 foot times and less rpm's on the engine, and less compression, look no further than a set of factory oval port heads. Velosity will be up at lower engine speeds, resulting in torque down low that our heavy trucks need to get moving quickly. Rectangular heads have a very large intake runner that requires lots of air to start working. This means that you would have to run alot of cam, higher stall converter, and stiffer gearing to make work as well as the ovals. And porting them makes it worse on the requirements.
My suggestion, find a set of 781, 049, 290 open chamber oval port IORN heads, have the 2.19/1.88 valves installed, port match the intake to the gasket, and have the short turn radius cleaned up and that's it. Cost will reflect on who you chose to do the work, mind you. But I would not give this work to just anybody, locate an experienced head guy for the port work. I have $700 in my 781's and my Chevelle loves em. But my tires do not, lots of usable power on the street
If you are looing for a good set of aftermarket iorn ovals, check out the "grumpy" line that world products offer. Very close to the large modified ovals that I currently run, nice product.
My two cents
__________________
71 short/fleet ECE 4/6 drop, LQ4/700r4/3.42 gears
70 SS396 Chevelle 427/200-4R/3.73posi
61 Lincoln Continental, black on black

Son you are going to drive me to drinkin if you don't stop drivin that hot rod lincoln
67shortie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 11:34 PM   #15
mikep
Used to have a truck
 
mikep's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: port orchard WA
Posts: 1,552
I'm just a RPM loving fool :-)

Chevrolet was CRAZY to install those things on production cars.
__________________
No truck :-(
mikep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2002, 11:48 PM   #16
67shortie
Green club
 
67shortie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Central CA
Posts: 1,059
Hehe, Mike man I am just trying to get to 100 posts so I can get my avitar
I do have to admit, I run my 427 up there sometimes 6000 gets loud and hairy on the big mama
__________________
71 short/fleet ECE 4/6 drop, LQ4/700r4/3.42 gears
70 SS396 Chevelle 427/200-4R/3.73posi
61 Lincoln Continental, black on black

Son you are going to drive me to drinkin if you don't stop drivin that hot rod lincoln
67shortie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-12-2002, 01:14 AM   #17
Mudder
Registered User
 
Mudder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: East Central, MO
Posts: 11,336
You guys just go for it!

Ive learned more in the last couple of days about heads than I thought I would ever need to know. I have made up my mind what Im going to do. Gonna spend about 1500 but it wont be for just heads.
Mudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com