The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-14-2006, 12:15 AM   #26
krue
Designated A-hole!
 
krue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Mississippi
Posts: 36,450
Re: GM Goodwrench SB engines are craptastical

Good luck.
__________________
"If it ain't broke, fix it 'til it is!"
Being stupid ain't illegal.

We're Still Debt Free Except for the House!!!
www.daveramsey.com

70 GMC SWB Stepside project "Green Booger" soon to be 6.0l/4l80e
93 S-10 "Poppaw's Truck"
krue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2006, 01:10 PM   #27
Greubin
Registered User
 
Greubin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SJC
Posts: 158
Re: GM Goodwrench SB engines are craptastical

I received good news this morning. All my phone calls and rattling cages payed off. My dealer is going to repair the cylinder heads. I hope everything goes well from here on out.
__________________
___________

Greubin
'71 C20 custom - GM Crate 350CI/290HP, BTO 700R4 level II, Qjet, and HEI

Last edited by Greubin; 09-14-2006 at 03:39 PM.
Greubin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2006, 01:15 PM   #28
gator2511
Registered User
 
gator2511's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: tampa florida
Posts: 776
Re: GM Goodwrench SB engines are craptastical

Thats great news! Its a shame that it took so much effort to get them to honor the engine like they should. Good Luck
gator2511 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2006, 02:44 PM   #29
JMac11
Registered User
 
JMac11's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Tallahassee Fl
Posts: 773
Re: GM Goodwrench SB engines are craptastical

Just an FYI....... Valves and guides within factory specs, oil consumption should not be a problem with no seals. For decades GM only put small o-rings on the valves, to stop oil consumption. Having rebuilt heads myself, I have used the type on the engine, when knurling guidess, but with new guides and new valves, just the small o rings.
JMac11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2006, 04:20 PM   #30
dave666693
Registered User
 
dave666693's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Edgewood, WA
Posts: 900
Re: GM Goodwrench SB engines are craptastical

Does anyone re-build their own motors anymore?
dave666693 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2006, 04:29 PM   #31
1970 CST Short Wide
Senior Moment
 
1970 CST Short Wide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pittsburg Ca
Posts: 4,142
Re: GM Goodwrench SB engines are craptastical

Glad to hear there fixin you up. Weve never had any more troubles with our engine since they fixed the heads, but ours had bad springs too. Hope they do them up right for you.
__________________
1970 CST LS 1 6 speed Ford 9 inch Detroit Tru Track, Dakota Didgital, Vintage Air, QA1 Coil Overs Front & Rear Lots of FUN
2013 GMC PU, Oldest Son
71 GMC LWB. QA1 Suspension, Angry SB. Youngest Son
2019 GMC Diesil Dually. Youngest Son
2017 Toyota SUV Daughters car
2018 Traverse , Wife’s Ride
Pittsburg Ca
94565
1970 CST Short Wide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2006, 04:31 PM   #32
72SWBChevy
Registered User
 
72SWBChevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 753
Re: GM Goodwrench SB engines are craptastical

I am considering buying a ZZ4, but now I dont know which way to go. It seems you cant get a reliable product unless you rebuild it yourself. Good feedback from everyone.
__________________
1977 Camaro 468 BBC - SOLD -
1972 Chevy SWB....in the works!!

2006 Crew Cab Dmax/Allison Summit White-SOLD-
2009 Toyota Tacoma V6 Pre Runner - daily driver -

my build thread -http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...95#post4774595
72SWBChevy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2006, 04:42 PM   #33
MisterMan
Account Suspended
 
MisterMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Visalia, California
Posts: 286
Re: GM Goodwrench SB engines are craptastical

bought my rebuilt 350 4 bolt main, cam, 9;5:1 compression ratio and a few extra lil dingy's . man said all stock items it would pump 300 hp. i now got headers, ele fan, performer intake re built stock carb (4b)... hoping for around 320 hp or so..... paid 1750 for engine. just engine. (private builder in town, called "repower inc")
MisterMan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2006, 07:00 PM   #34
Greubin
Registered User
 
Greubin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SJC
Posts: 158
Re: GM Goodwrench SB engines are craptastical

If one should go with a rebuilt engine, make sure you cough up the extra $$ for magnafluxing the block and heads to check for casting flaws, etc.
__________________
___________

Greubin
'71 C20 custom - GM Crate 350CI/290HP, BTO 700R4 level II, Qjet, and HEI
Greubin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2006, 10:13 PM   #35
68 Stepside
huh?
 
68 Stepside's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Washington, Illinois
Posts: 5,692
Re: GM Goodwrench SB engines are craptastical

I had a ZZ3 in my 85 Z28. I put 16,000 hard miles on it in 9 months, puking a transmission in the works, and had 0 problems with the engine. But I've also heard horror stories about the same engine, and other GM crates, well...crate engines in general. I've heard more bad stuff about Jasper than I can even think of.......I'll build the next one....
__________________
Someday when I'm lonely,
Wishing you weren't so far away,
Then I will remember
Things we said today.

RIP El Jay
68 Stepside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2006, 11:15 PM   #36
Billla
Account Suspended
 
Billla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,815
Re: GM Goodwrench SB engines are craptastical

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Christian View Post
I have a ZZ-4 and IMO it is GREAT and would buy it again!
Yes, but the GMPP engines are completely different than the "Targetmaster" crate replacement engines.
Billla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2006, 11:18 PM   #37
Billla
Account Suspended
 
Billla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Monroe, WA
Posts: 3,815
Re: GM Goodwrench SB engines are craptastical

Quote:
Originally Posted by dave666693 View Post
Does anyone re-build their own motors anymore?
Yes - me :-D The biggest challenge is that the dollars are almost a wash anymore...I'm working on a 1995 LT1 O/H right now, but I could have bought the same engine in a crate from Golen Engine Service for only about $800-$1000 more than what it's costing me :/
Billla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2006, 11:37 PM   #38
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,023
Re: GM Goodwrench SB engines are craptastical

Quote:
Originally Posted by dave666693 View Post
Does anyone re-build their own motors anymore?
Not unless they just want the experience. My bro-in-law who has built motors for years told me "buy a GM crate motor, you can not beat the price". I took his advice and bought a Ramjet 350. I love it so far...
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2006, 01:44 AM   #39
Gray Ghost
Senior Member
 
Gray Ghost's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Terrell, TX
Posts: 1,967
Re: GM Goodwrench SB engines are craptastical

I bought a crate motor on the recommendation of a few people. I will NEVER buy another one. I like the new word you made up for them, fits perfectly.

GM Crates suck. The 'made in' stamp on the block says it all.
__________________
Kelly
'05 GMC Sierra SLE Z71
Bone stock except for new bed rail caps.
Gray Ghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2006, 11:48 AM   #40
Green Machine
Senior Member
 
Green Machine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Estherville, Iowa
Posts: 3,371
Re: GM Goodwrench SB engines are craptastical

I agree and run an older engine like that myself, however if you notice, his heads use the newer style valves that only have one groove, no place for an o ring, they rely entirely on the seals under the springs, with no o ring there is a fair amount of oil going down the stem that can only be stopped by the seals, so they have to be good.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JMac11 View Post
Just an FYI....... Valves and guides within factory specs, oil consumption should not be a problem with no seals. For decades GM only put small o-rings on the valves, to stop oil consumption. Having rebuilt heads myself, I have used the type on the engine, when knurling guidess, but with new guides and new valves, just the small o rings.
__________________
1968 C10 307 3spd Long Fleet ------ http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=201103
1970 C10 305 Super T10 Long Fleet --- http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=202285
1971 C20 383 TH350 Dana Posi ----- http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=206894
2001 GMC Sierra 1500 C3 6.0
Green Machine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2006, 03:37 PM   #41
bwright
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Dickson, TN
Posts: 141
Re: GM Goodwrench SB engines are craptastical

That's why I build my own engines. Cost wise it's a wash (not including my labor), but at least I know what I've got when I'm done. Only downside is that I don't have a warranty.
__________________
1977 Chevrolet C10 - 305/TH350, SWB, Stepside, 3/5 drop...work in progress.
bwright is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2006, 06:39 PM   #42
Greubin
Registered User
 
Greubin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: SJC
Posts: 158
Re: GM Goodwrench SB engines are craptastical

It's done - I picked up my truck this morning from the local Chevy Dealer. No smoke or knocking. I hope this is the end..thanks for all the replies and tips.

It's a good feeling to have the old girl back
__________________
___________

Greubin
'71 C20 custom - GM Crate 350CI/290HP, BTO 700R4 level II, Qjet, and HEI
Greubin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com