The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-17-2008, 01:40 PM   #1
big mike
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: kansas city
Posts: 3
402 HP and spec question

Can anyone tell me why the 1972 BBC 402 has such a low horsepower rating compared to the 1971 402 motor when both have the same casting numbers on blocks and heads. Is it compression ratio, camshaft, or what?

Will a change in the camshaft on a stock 1972 truck 402 improve the horsepower dramatically? Thanks
big mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2008, 02:37 PM   #2
JimKshortstep4x4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Muskegon,MI,USA
Posts: 6,026
Re: 402 HP and spec question

Welcome to the 67-72 truck board from West Michigan!

The horse power rating was changed from "gross" to "net" for the 72 and newer years. The engines are basically the same only the rating system changed.

A cam by itself will probably not help performance because of the low compression the engine has.

Jim
__________________
1971 Shortbox step side 4x4, 350 sbc, 3:07 rear end
1965 Impala SS 400 sbc, Muncie rock crusher
1966 Impala SS 396 bbc, TH 400
1969 El Camino, 350 sbc, TH 350
1971 Snowplow built on a Blazer frame
1972 GMC Short bed, stepside, TH 400, 427 BBC
JimKshortstep4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2008, 02:38 PM   #3
cdowns
Senior Member
 
cdowns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: daytonabeach
Posts: 22,956
Re: 402 HP and spec question

they changed the way they reported horsepower for insurance reasons back in the muclecar era so your 72 probally has just as much horsepower as the 71 i doubt theres any noticeable differance
__________________
71c-10 350/2004r/4:11 lowered3/4 longbed/dead by hurricane

MEANING OF DEATH::::: SOMEBODY ELSE GETS YOUR STUFF

DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU THINK

TAKE MY ADVISE;I DON'T USE IT ANYWAY
cdowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2008, 02:43 PM   #4
big mike
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: kansas city
Posts: 3
Re: 402 HP and spec question

Thanks for the replies. I was about to sell this motor off cheap because I thought it was just a boat anchor. Now I feel better about spending the money for a new valve job, a new cam and lifters and an aftermarket intake manifold.
big mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2008, 07:41 PM   #5
ofnaman
Registered User
 
ofnaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: reno
Posts: 397
Re: 402 HP and spec question

I just (2 weeks ago) rebuilt my '70 402 and did a valve job on it and put a good cam in it. I also put an aluminum intake on it and HEI. Same crappy holley carb. I only honed the cylinders and reused the stock pistons. I cannot believe the power difference. If it was not for the crappy carb this thing would run great. Before the rebuild it ran good, I rebuilt it because the #1 cylinder intake valve lifter broke and I wanted to go through it anyway. I would never trash a usable 396 or 402, they are great running engines, and you could easily make a ton of power out of them.

Quote:
Originally Posted by big mike View Post
Can anyone tell me why the 1972 BBC 402 has such a low horsepower rating compared to the 1971 402 motor when both have the same casting numbers on blocks and heads. Is it compression ratio, camshaft, or what?

Will a change in the camshaft on a stock 1972 truck 402 improve the horsepower dramatically? Thanks
__________________
A sweet 2000 Deville.....
ofnaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 02:44 AM   #6
streetstar
Registered User
 
streetstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Moore, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,396
Re: 402 HP and spec question

Quote:
Originally Posted by big mike View Post
Thanks for the replies. I was about to sell this motor off cheap because I thought it was just a boat anchor. Now I feel better about spending the money for a new valve job, a new cam and lifters and an aftermarket intake manifold.
yep -- its a boat anchor alright. I'll be there tomorrow with $75.00 in my pocket, so have it swingin for me --


just kidding - any big block is worth keeping --
__________________
Are you retired too?

Nonsense! I'm in my prime
streetstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2008, 07:25 AM   #7
big mike
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: kansas city
Posts: 3
Re: 402 HP and spec question

Darn...I misplaced that chain. I guess I'll have to invest some money into it and give it a topside rebuild. Now I need to decide what size cam to put in it without getting crazy.
big mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com