03-16-2008, 09:43 PM | #26 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: oregon
Posts: 1,069
|
Re: 350 or 400?
stay away from the 400................they have a design problem with the siamesed cylinders and will not last as long as the 350. The cylinder bores go out of round due to uneven cooling and they turn into oil burners.
You can not just bolt any 400 flywheel on there either. The whole ASSEMBLY will need balanced. stay with your 350
__________________
69 K-20 cloned to a 67 with front clip and some other stuff. 383 .040 over Crane roller cam lifters and rockers ,1.6 intake ratio, Open chamber heads, 9.5-1 compression ratio, 2.02 intake valves , Edelbrock performer Air Gap manifold Carter AFB performer 750cfm, MSD ignition, SM465 NP205 4.10 gears: |
03-17-2008, 03:24 PM | #27 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 411
|
Re: 350 or 400?
come on now if a siamesed block was bad do you think gm would use that design for their bow tie racing blocks? 400 sbc is great jus dont overheat it, cylinder walls are siamesed to be stronger and for bigger bore.
__________________
ASE MASTER TECH
|
03-17-2008, 07:54 PM | #28 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 431
|
Re: 350 or 400?
Have you considered turning the 350 into a 383? Sounds like the perfect compromise to me. Thats what I am doing as we type.
__________________
1972 GMC Sierra Grande 3/4 Ton 4x4 1970 Mercury Cougar XR7 1943 Farmall M |
03-18-2008, 01:01 AM | #29 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: oregon
Posts: 1,069
|
Re: 350 or 400?
Quote:
This is the classic argument 400 vs 350 block The reason they are siamesed is because the bore is too big for a reasonable wll thickness at the water jacket area. they cool unevenly and the cylinders go out of round. The racing blocks you mention aren't even the same animal The 400 was a short lived GM experiment that didn't last for a good reason. Those are the facts!
__________________
69 K-20 cloned to a 67 with front clip and some other stuff. 383 .040 over Crane roller cam lifters and rockers ,1.6 intake ratio, Open chamber heads, 9.5-1 compression ratio, 2.02 intake valves , Edelbrock performer Air Gap manifold Carter AFB performer 750cfm, MSD ignition, SM465 NP205 4.10 gears: |
|
03-18-2008, 03:29 AM | #30 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ky
Posts: 6
|
Re: 350 or 400?
go with the 400 and put a 350 crank in i really liked mine
|
03-18-2008, 06:53 AM | #31 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: oregon
Posts: 1,069
|
Re: 350 or 400?
383!!!
__________________
69 K-20 cloned to a 67 with front clip and some other stuff. 383 .040 over Crane roller cam lifters and rockers ,1.6 intake ratio, Open chamber heads, 9.5-1 compression ratio, 2.02 intake valves , Edelbrock performer Air Gap manifold Carter AFB performer 750cfm, MSD ignition, SM465 NP205 4.10 gears: |
03-18-2008, 06:53 AM | #32 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: oregon
Posts: 1,069
|
Re: 350 or 400?
here we go again!!! 350/383 vs 400!!!!
__________________
69 K-20 cloned to a 67 with front clip and some other stuff. 383 .040 over Crane roller cam lifters and rockers ,1.6 intake ratio, Open chamber heads, 9.5-1 compression ratio, 2.02 intake valves , Edelbrock performer Air Gap manifold Carter AFB performer 750cfm, MSD ignition, SM465 NP205 4.10 gears: |
03-18-2008, 06:59 AM | #33 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 431
|
Re: 350 or 400?
Cock A Dodol DO
__________________
1972 GMC Sierra Grande 3/4 Ton 4x4 1970 Mercury Cougar XR7 1943 Farmall M |
03-18-2008, 07:11 AM | #34 | |
I have a radical idea!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
|
Re: 350 or 400?
Quote:
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435 ‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350 '69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT '69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435 '84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer 67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096 My trucks http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all Member of the 1-Ton Club! Last edited by 67_C-30; 03-18-2008 at 07:12 AM. |
|
03-18-2008, 07:13 AM | #35 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 2,057
|
Re: 350 or 400?
|
03-18-2008, 07:19 AM | #36 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 2,057
|
Re: 350 or 400?
yep... im still sticking to my story, GM wouldnt have made it for 10 years if they had cooling probleoms, im sure they could identify the probleom sooner than that
im not saying they dont overheat, and they dont crack, but ive worked off and on at an automotive machine/ engine shop for 8 years. ive seen everything from original 1955 corvette 265's that have had cracked blocks to 90's caddillacs having porus block causing water leaks. it happens to all of 'em... and i have been around plenty of GREAT running 400 small blocks. TORQUE MONSTERS... |
03-18-2008, 07:44 AM | #37 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: oregon
Posts: 1,069
|
Re: 350 or 400?
Quote:
67 C-30 is telling you all exactly what i was told by an engine builder that replaced a whole fleet of trucks with the 400 SB with 350s simply because of what we are preaching here. Sure the "concept" of a 4oo sb is exciting. The reality of the whole thing is that they CRACK!!!! I personaly have no problem at all making my mind up...............to each his own................ and the famed argument continues..............as it always will.......................................................400vs350vs400vs350vs400vs350 on and on we go!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
__________________
69 K-20 cloned to a 67 with front clip and some other stuff. 383 .040 over Crane roller cam lifters and rockers ,1.6 intake ratio, Open chamber heads, 9.5-1 compression ratio, 2.02 intake valves , Edelbrock performer Air Gap manifold Carter AFB performer 750cfm, MSD ignition, SM465 NP205 4.10 gears: |
|
03-18-2008, 07:46 AM | #38 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: oregon
Posts: 1,069
|
Re: 350 or 400?
nope I mean 383!!!!
and we all know that starts with a 350 block!!!!
__________________
69 K-20 cloned to a 67 with front clip and some other stuff. 383 .040 over Crane roller cam lifters and rockers ,1.6 intake ratio, Open chamber heads, 9.5-1 compression ratio, 2.02 intake valves , Edelbrock performer Air Gap manifold Carter AFB performer 750cfm, MSD ignition, SM465 NP205 4.10 gears: |
03-18-2008, 07:47 AM | #39 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 2,057
|
Re: 350 or 400?
|
03-18-2008, 07:49 AM | #40 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 2,057
|
Re: 350 or 400?
Quote:
and i'll agree 350's are great. i have about a dozen of them out in the garage aka "my inventory" but, as mant belive there is no replacement for displacement!! |
|
03-18-2008, 07:49 AM | #41 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: oregon
Posts: 1,069
|
Re: 350 or 400?
Okay to be fair to all reading these posts.....................let's look at it like this:
If you had a choice of the odds.......................and the 400 is very highly likely to crack and a 350 is way less likely to crack........................................what is the logical decision?
__________________
69 K-20 cloned to a 67 with front clip and some other stuff. 383 .040 over Crane roller cam lifters and rockers ,1.6 intake ratio, Open chamber heads, 9.5-1 compression ratio, 2.02 intake valves , Edelbrock performer Air Gap manifold Carter AFB performer 750cfm, MSD ignition, SM465 NP205 4.10 gears: |
03-18-2008, 07:54 AM | #42 | |
I have a radical idea!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
|
Re: 350 or 400?
Quote:
Just speaking my personal experience man! Now to be fair, I have seen and have even owned 1 400 myself that had almost no core shift and it was a running son-of-a-gun, but unfortunately they were produced at about the worst time they could have been produced in terms of quality control. The mid 70's - early 80's GM (all domestic manufacturers actually) lack of quality is why they are so many ricers on the road today. I have seen a small handful of 400's that even sonic checked good and were bored .060" over that lived. You don't usually get a second chance if you sling a belt and overheat one though. My point about a 400 is that they are truly a crapshoot. If you get a good one you're lucky, but the chance (probability) of getting a thin one steers me away from them.
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435 ‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350 '69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT '69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435 '84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer 67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096 My trucks http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all Member of the 1-Ton Club! |
|
03-18-2008, 08:02 AM | #43 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 2,057
|
Re: 350 or 400?
Quote:
that makes me steer away from any mid 70's motors, save for 454's ive had pretty good luck with those so far. ive seen and had several sets of 70's lightweight casting 350 heads that i knew would be cracked before i even mag'd 'em |
|
03-18-2008, 08:05 AM | #44 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 2,057
|
Re: 350 or 400?
you could also say racecars and old cars in general clash with what most people would consider a logical decision.
8 mpg, and dump in twice the money you'll ever get out of it, or save it and drive a kia? you only live once might as well make the best of it a go all out |
03-18-2008, 08:10 AM | #45 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Emporium,Pa
Posts: 248
|
Re: 350 or 400?
Heres a dumb idea.....if your pulling the 70 off to put on a '71 frame....why not spend the extra time and money and BUILD an engine? The list is varied 355, 358, 377, 383,406,408 and the list goes on and on. Or for that matter throw in a mild 402, 427 or a 454BB. After all is said and done, its your truck do what you feel works for you. Just my odd ball opinion
BTW stick with the 350!
__________________
"When you were born, you cried and the world rejoiced. Live your life so that when you die, the world cries and you rejoice." [Cherokee saying] 2001 Dodge Ram Sport 1500 4x4. (old ride) 1987 GMC V1500 Sierra Classic ("new" ride) Last edited by ChevyC102007; 03-18-2008 at 08:10 AM. |
03-18-2008, 08:41 AM | #46 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: oregon
Posts: 1,069
|
Re: 350 or 400?
Quote:
A 400 is not a good foundation for an engine build. Sure....get lucky and have a torque monstyer with little to no build work.yes I agree with the "concept".. The facts are that the reality says "stay away from the 400SB."
__________________
69 K-20 cloned to a 67 with front clip and some other stuff. 383 .040 over Crane roller cam lifters and rockers ,1.6 intake ratio, Open chamber heads, 9.5-1 compression ratio, 2.02 intake valves , Edelbrock performer Air Gap manifold Carter AFB performer 750cfm, MSD ignition, SM465 NP205 4.10 gears: |
|
03-18-2008, 10:21 AM | #47 |
1972 Chevrolet SWB
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: FT Smith AR
Posts: 512
|
Re: 350 or 400?
The 400 I took .040 was a 2 bolt 1970 model and ran real strong and checked out great. The reason for the .040 over bore and not smaller is that one cylinder wall was scored and t cleaned up at .035 so all the others were bored and then all honed to match. My 2 engines now are a 1976 350 that will stay standard bore with a polished crank,and another 400 1970 model thats been rebuilt once so condition is really un known right now but was running when I pulled it.
Yes these debates will run forever and will always do so. To tell that every 400 is bad and will not be as good as a 350 is not true,but opinion. There are way too many 406,427 and 434 engines built that prove otherwise. It is to my understanding the reason so many 400 blocks were trashed was because the shorter connecting rods placed wear on the sides of the bore (pistons trying to push outward on the side of the block)which tapered the bores wearing the blocks out before the rest of the engine was ready to be trashed. Thats one reason 383 became a popular build as there were way too many 3.75 cranks sitting around with bad blocks and they were cleverly mated to 350 blocks for stroker engines that ran strong. Personally,I will always entertain building a 400 if the choice is there and the building block is a solid one,but will always fully check for cracks and bore taper/wear to determine if its clean enough to work. I will also never pass up a good buildable 350 as those tend to outwear the 400 and are easily picked up for great prices. I am for building any stout reliable engine for its purpose,and if that 400 fits the bill,Im sold,and if that 350 also fits the bill I will run it. At the time of my first 400 build I was building a 327 also for my race/drag car 68 Nova and the 408 was for my street 67 Impala. I built the 327 on a budget with most money in the heads,great shape used forged .100 dome pistons and such with the 400 getting all new parts for the street car. IF I were to do it all over again I would have put the 400 in that Nova because my street car would have stomped my drag car. I say to each his own and fully weigh your options for your build.
__________________
My New thread with pics (not my build thread yet.) http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...46#post2573646 1972 Chevrolet 1/2 ton short wide bed,68 frt clip Project. 1980 Camaro Inherited when father passed,68K Miles 2003 Ford Mach1 FUN as Hell!! 2002 Dodge Ram 5-8 slam Rolling BillBoard (Gone not forgot) 2004 Dodge Ram HEMI 10" lifted on 37's and 2wd. Last edited by slammed1; 03-18-2008 at 10:22 AM. |
03-18-2008, 10:38 PM | #48 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Maryville, MO
Posts: 49
|
Re: 350 or 400?
Wow guys, I was looking for opinions and boy am I getting them. I didn't realize there was such a debate between these two - glad I asked.
So unfortunately I am still torn - though I am getting increasingly leery of the 400 with all the comments on their longevity and reliability issues. At this point I am not in a position to rebuild either one due to the all so common lack of finances at this time. Thus my question as to whether to drop the original 58K mile 350 back in or the 60+K mile "tuned-up" 400 this guy never had any problems with. I get the idea the 350 Chevy was around so long due to its inherant ability to hold up just about anything. I had a '78 shortbox with the original 350 that was at 215K miles without a rebuild when I sold it and it was still running strong (wish I would have kept that one btw!). Just another reason to stick with the 350 in my mind. With the long weekend coming up I am planning on putting in one or the other. Sure wish I could just buy the 400, try it out for a while then decide which to part with. Again don't have the cash laying around for that option. You guys keep throughing your opinions out there and just maybe I will make up my mind on this end! Thanks again for all the input!
__________________
1970 C20 350 4-Speed no options but only 56K original miles.....Now a K20 mutt with a SB400! 2002 Impala LS (wife's car) |
03-18-2008, 10:50 PM | #49 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Buffalo MN
Posts: 606
|
Re: 350 or 400?
if it were me i would stick with the 350, i have a 400 sbc in my old plow truck and its a good strong motor but no matter what i do to the thing it just eats oil it dont eat alot but enough to frustrate me althought ive never had any problems with my 350 and i have beat the snot out of both engines and the 350 perfored just as good if not better so it really depends on how reliable u want ur engine to be the parts or different for 400s and there built a little different so not as many parts can be changed from bore to bore when running a 400 were as a 350 is alot more versitile parts and cost wise, not to mention u can still go to any junk or scrap yard and pull a 350 for a couple hundred bucks good luck with ur truck
__________________
Trial and Error, its expensive but its a mistake i most likely wont make again 1971 chevy k10 custom deluxe http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=341257 1968 chevy k/10 fleet http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=334731 1948 desoto custom coupe fluid drive(family heirloom) |
03-18-2008, 11:13 PM | #50 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: CA
Posts: 2,057
|
Re: 350 or 400?
Quote:
excellent point! |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|