The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-20-2010, 10:50 AM   #1
gkesseru
Registered User
 
gkesseru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: California, Maryland
Posts: 544
Driveline angles changes in a drop

From another thread I was directed to read the importance of minimizing U-Joint angles changes in a driveline system.
see http://www.drivetrain.com/parts_cata..._problems.html

Using this info, it infers that when you drop the rearend you should also raise the transmission mount and the front pivot point of the trailing arm in a coil spring suspension to keep the u-joint angle back at 0 degrees. (for leafs they recommend shims)

In my 68 shortbed, the trannie mount is 38" from the engine mount and the rear axle is 112". The front trailing is 49 1/2 in front of the rear axle centerline. Doing some quick calculations, for every inch of actual drop in the rear I should raise the trannie mount point .34 inches and raise the trailing arm front pivot by .44 inches.

For a 4" drop therefore I should raise the trannie by 1.36 inches and the training arm front by 1.77 inches.
Are there any frustrated engineers out there that agree?
__________________
72 Fleet (died)
78 Step (sold)
55 Step named Fred (sold)
00 F150
68 Step (named El Scorcho by PO)
Build thread for the new El Scorcho http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=392932
gkesseru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2010, 01:07 PM   #2
Rollie396
someday it will be done!
 
Rollie396's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Lloydminster,AB. Canada
Posts: 1,620
Re: Driveline angles changes in a drop

I can't find the link I had but there are shims available for coil spring rearends.Unless I'm missing the point.
__________________
'72 C-10 Proud owner of a million new and used pieces that used to be and will once again be(god willing) a testament to the term "they don't build em like that anymore.
'80 LWB 2wd beater
'67 GMC long fleet (cab donor)
'66 long step (parked till it's turn comes around)
'65 short step (parts truck that will donate it's bed and possibly frame to the '66)
'06 Grand Prix wife's car (she hardly lets me touch it)
my pics
Rollie396 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2010, 01:33 PM   #3
fixit-p
Registered User
 
fixit-p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Yay Area CA
Posts: 2,329
Re: Driveline angles changes in a drop

You never want your u joints to have 0* operating angle, the needle bearings in the caps cant rotate. Always maintain a minimum 1* use speed chart for maximum operating angle, what you want to shoot for 0* is the pinion angle.
Lots of good info here>> http://www2.dana.com/pdf/J3311-1-DSSP.pdf
Attached Images
 
__________________
1965 GMC shortwide big window
1969 Chevy C20 long (for now)
2005 Silverado 2500HD Crew Cab


Quote:
Originally posted by:Abraham Lincoln "The trouble with quotes on the Internet is that it is nearly impossible to discern if they are genuine."

Last edited by fixit-p; 01-20-2010 at 06:17 PM. Reason: link & removed decimal point
fixit-p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2010, 04:01 PM   #4
gkesseru
Registered User
 
gkesseru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: California, Maryland
Posts: 544
Re: Driveline angles changes in a drop

Thanks for the reply. I'll shoot for "almost" 0 degrees. I do doubt that I can measure to within .1 degree accuracy. The main point here is to keep the geometry close to factory specs for a shortbed, you should raise the transmission mount about 1/3 inch and the front trailing arm about .4 inch for each inch of spring shortening. The reason I brought this up is that none of the discussions I have read at this site cover the need to raise the transmission mount point as well as the trailing arm pivot point. Several have mentioned the need to move or replace the trailing arm mounts. If a lowered rear end messes up the rear yoke geometry, then it would also mess up the front yoke geometry.

Here's the plan: Once I'm ready, I'll put the engine and transmission in, remove rear springs and use a jack to raise the rear axle to proper height and do some measurements. I can them shim the transmission and move the trailing arm fronts until everything measures well. Then I'll cut the trailing arm mount rivets, flip them upside down if necessary and remount at the proper height.
__________________
72 Fleet (died)
78 Step (sold)
55 Step named Fred (sold)
00 F150
68 Step (named El Scorcho by PO)
Build thread for the new El Scorcho http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=392932
gkesseru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2010, 04:15 PM   #5
gkesseru
Registered User
 
gkesseru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: California, Maryland
Posts: 544
Re: Driveline angles changes in a drop

Just read the Spicer Dana write-up. Great read. It pretty much explains what needs to be done:
1. Keep angle from transmission to drive shaft between 1 and 3 degrees.
2. Keep angle from driveshaft to differential front yoke between 1 and 3 degrees.
3. Make the previous two angles as close to equal as possible.
__________________
72 Fleet (died)
78 Step (sold)
55 Step named Fred (sold)
00 F150
68 Step (named El Scorcho by PO)
Build thread for the new El Scorcho http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=392932
gkesseru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2010, 04:56 PM   #6
fixit-p
Registered User
 
fixit-p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Yay Area CA
Posts: 2,329
Re: Driveline angles changes in a drop

Quote:
Originally Posted by gkesseru View Post
Just read the Spicer Dana write-up. Great read. It pretty much explains what needs to be done:
1. Keep angle from transmission to drive shaft between 1 and 3 degrees.
2. Keep angle from driveshaft to differential front yoke between 1 and 3 degrees.
3. Make the previous two angles as close to equal as possible.
On a two piece drive line it's a little different, the first drive line should be installed so that the universal joint at the transmission has an operating angle of 1-1.5* and the axle's centerline needs to be parallel with the first drive lines centerline and not the transmission like with the one piece.
Most of the time I see pinion angle corrections the axle is cut from the saddles and rotated up or down then the saddles re-welded or using wedge type shims between saddle and trailing arm. Your idea of shimming the trans and raising trailing arm mounts makes sense especially if one doesn't have the means to cut and re-weld saddles.
__________________
1965 GMC shortwide big window
1969 Chevy C20 long (for now)
2005 Silverado 2500HD Crew Cab


Quote:
Originally posted by:Abraham Lincoln "The trouble with quotes on the Internet is that it is nearly impossible to discern if they are genuine."
fixit-p is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2010, 06:04 PM   #7
gkesseru
Registered User
 
gkesseru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: California, Maryland
Posts: 544
Re: Driveline angles changes in a drop

It's the simplest way I can come up with pointing the transmission to the rear yoke (within 1-3 degrees). Thanks for the feedback. It encourages me to hear the voice of experience.
__________________
72 Fleet (died)
78 Step (sold)
55 Step named Fred (sold)
00 F150
68 Step (named El Scorcho by PO)
Build thread for the new El Scorcho http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=392932
gkesseru is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2010, 06:16 PM   #8
fixit-p
Registered User
 
fixit-p's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Yay Area CA
Posts: 2,329
Re: Driveline angles changes in a drop

Quote:
Originally Posted by fixit-p View Post
You never want your u joints to have 0* operating angle, the needle bearings in the caps cant rotate. Always maintain a minimum .1* use speed chart for maximum operating angle, what you want to shoot for 0* is the pinion angle.
Oops where did that decimal come from I meant 1*
__________________
1965 GMC shortwide big window
1969 Chevy C20 long (for now)
2005 Silverado 2500HD Crew Cab


Quote:
Originally posted by:Abraham Lincoln "The trouble with quotes on the Internet is that it is nearly impossible to discern if they are genuine."

Last edited by fixit-p; 01-20-2010 at 06:19 PM.
fixit-p is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com