The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-26-2011, 08:04 PM   #1
slugish
Slugish
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Earlysville, Va.
Posts: 1,024
Opinions needed on head choice.

dOES ANYONE KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT SUMMITT ALUM. HEADS aNYBODY RUN NING THEM ? Iwrote summitt & told them what I had ( 400 sbc , flat top pistons ,airgap, full headers, 750 Holley)xe 268 cam now ,stock reworked heads. Will upgrade to a xe 274 cam . they suggested Summitt brand -200 cc intake runners, 64 combustion chamber . Isaid Iwanted the biggest bang for the buck . Previously they recommended trick flow . Since they own trick flow ,Istill wonder if they are the same as summitt . Summitt 1050.00 pair , trickflow about 1250.00, AFR ABOUT 1450.00 .
slugish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2011, 08:06 PM   #2
baclay9
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 1,344
Re: Opinions needed on head choice.

When you order the summit brand I would bet you get Trick flow in the box probably.
baclay9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2011, 08:26 PM   #3
3r!c84
Badass
 
3r!c84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: lox. fl
Posts: 4,586
Re: Opinions needed on head choice.

With flat tops what kind of compression will you be running with 64cc heads?
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
Think outside the box?
-84c10 (1stcar)→My Build
-00 Saturn 5spd

drop a gear and disappear!

1/4:13:90
3r!c84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2011, 08:43 PM   #4
slugish
Slugish
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Earlysville, Va.
Posts: 1,024
Re: Opinions needed on head choice.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3r!c84 View Post
with flat tops what kind of compression will you be running with 64cc heads?
posted via mobile device
not sure . Was told by someone whose opinion i respect that 64 cc would not hurt my compression ratio which i think it should be around 9.5-10.1.
slugish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2011, 09:17 PM   #5
russgt
Registered User
 
russgt's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Waukesha, WI
Posts: 904
Re: Opinions needed on head choice.

Your stock reworked heads, are they 400 heads or? I think you might be going from a 76 cc chamber to a 64 cc chamber. While Summit owns Trick Flow, the Summit heads do not use the Twisted Wedge design of the Trick Flows.
__________________
70 stepside
76 blazer
86 Silverado
20 Max Trailering 6.2 Crew
71 Nova SS

My Blazer build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=363634
russgt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2011, 09:38 PM   #6
b454rat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 3,469
Re: Opinions needed on head choice.

Me personally wouldn't run anything that has Summit's name on it. Valve covers, air cleaner stuff like that is fine, but nothing motor wise.

Do you have stock rods or 5.7"?? I built a 406 with 350 rods and with 64cc heads and I believe 22cc dish pistons I was at 9.8-1 compression. I think your gonna be well over 10-1. I had the same cam, used stock TBI heads/intake, motor had gobs of torque....

I wanted to build another 406, building the short block the same, but using mild Vortec heads, with that cam, 750 carb, headers, blah blah, been told many that it would have been 425-ish horse. Was gonna go in a 2wd S-10 Blazer....
__________________
2000 GMC CCSB 454/4L80 6” lift SAS
1999 Chevy CCSB 454/NV4500 4” SAS
1999 GMC Yukon 350/4L60 6" SAS
b454rat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 09:30 PM   #7
slugish
Slugish
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Earlysville, Va.
Posts: 1,024
Re: Opinions needed on head choice.

Quote:
Originally Posted by b454rat View Post
Me personally wouldn't run anything that has Summit's name on it. Valve covers, air cleaner stuff like that is fine, but nothing motor wise.

Do you have stock rods or 5.7"?? I built a 406 with 350 rods and with 64cc heads and I believe 22cc dish pistons I was at 9.8-1 compression. I think your gonna be well over 10-1. I had the same cam, used stock TBI heads/intake, motor had gobs of torque....

I wanted to build another 406, building the short block the same, but using mild Vortec heads, with that cam, 750 carb, headers, blah blah, been told many that it would have been 425-ish horse. Was gonna go in a 2wd S-10 Blazer....
did not build the engine > probably stock rods.

Also found out today Summitt heads are Brodix,not trickflow.
slugish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 10:37 PM   #8
bluex
Registered User
 
bluex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Spartanburg, SC
Posts: 1,963
Re: Opinions needed on head choice.

You can't go wrong with the afr's if you've got the extra bucks for them. That 400 is going to want a lot of air flow.

I helped a friend as he built a 400 for his camaro and he went through a lot of studying before he settled on afr's. I thought he could have saved some money using a different head but the dyno told the truth. His put out 503 HP and 538 tq. Super Chevy built a very similar engine using the dart top end package and it was down 40 or so HP compared to his....
Posted via Mobile Device
bluex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-27-2011, 11:01 PM   #9
slugish
Slugish
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Earlysville, Va.
Posts: 1,024
Re: Opinions needed on head choice.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bluex View Post
You can't go wrong with the afr's if you've got the extra bucks for them. That 400 is going to want a lot of air flow.

I helped a friend as he built a 400 for his camaro and he went through a lot of studying before he settled on afr's. I thought he could have saved some money using a different head but the dyno told the truth. His put out 503 HP and 538 tq. Super Chevy built a very similar engine using the dart top end package and it was down 40 or so HP compared to his....
Posted via Mobile Device
thx for this info. Iguess it must be head design .Ithought that 200 cc intake runners should run the same no matter what brand you bought. Are not AFR CNC MACHINE PORTED & many of the other brands are not ? .Ive been told by more than one who supposed to know what they are talking about, that I probably would not see any big difference in performance if I used summitt, dart, afr trick flow etc etc. based upon what Ihave. What you are telling me seems like the "truth in the pudding" or they are wrong
slugish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-19-2011, 09:16 PM   #10
The Reca
Registered User
 
The Reca's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Manassas, VA
Posts: 56
Re: Opinions needed on head choice.

Did you decide which your going with?
__________________
Any1 from NoVa area?
The Reca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-20-2011, 10:21 PM   #11
slugish
Slugish
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Earlysville, Va.
Posts: 1,024
Re: Opinions needed on head choice.

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Reca View Post
Did you decide which your going with?
Thinking Iwill go with the summitt (Brodix ) heads . Feel they will flow all the cfm's I need . If Ihad a more serious engine (ie big roller cam with a lot more lift than what I will have ) AFR'S would be the ticket , I guess. Ithink it is a fact that how much air you can push thru your engine is determinded by how much valve lift you have.

Please anybody chime in on this ,Im hardly an expert on this subject .
slugish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2011, 01:07 AM   #12
dammitmitchell
the pollock
 
dammitmitchell's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: abilene, texas
Posts: 4,423
Re: Opinions needed on head choice.

call patriot heads they know their crap.
https://www.patriot-performance.com/

all i can say is keep with straight plug heads, the angle plugs offer no advantage anymore and the headers cost alot more.
__________________
Jack of ALL trades, Master of none.. (but one... procrastination)
Army vet 02-08
RIP El Jay! Miss you brother!


http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=343538
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=386042
dammitmitchell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2011, 01:55 AM   #13
KQQL IT
At the body shop.
 
KQQL IT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Land of fruits and nuts.
Posts: 5,254
Re: Opinions needed on head choice.

I got dart iron eagle 200 angle plugs on my 406.
Coming from worked camel humps@ 61 cc to 65cc darts
runs way better less detonation happy and at 300$ a side bare.
BTW even if you buy assembled heads have someone check them out.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
" That didnt make it any newer "
" Dont antique the equipment "
KQQL IT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-21-2011, 07:55 AM   #14
BigBlocksRule
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,047
Re: Opinions needed on head choice.

Flat top pistons with 64cc chambers is about 12:1 !!!! 72cc's gets it down closer to 11:1, still mixing gas or adding octane boost. SRP makes a reverse dome piston that'll get you to around 9.8:1 - they're the ones I'll be using on my 404 build, probably the same ones b454rat used. Other than that, all I could find was Keith Black.
I have some 225cc runner Bowtie Vortecs for mine, just picked up a raised runner intake, should be a great engine with a 238/246 hydraulic roller...
BigBlocksRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com